Back in college, a friend of mine who used to sketch “I, Argus Aardvark” for the Harvard Crimson
figured out why Dilbert’s Sunday strips suck harder than they do the
rest of the week: they’re basically a 4-panel strip with 4 filler
panels to get them into standard Sunday format.
Try this sometime: Cut out every other panel from a Sunday Dilbert.
Same strip — better, in fact — for half the price. (In the case of today’s, snip panels 1, 3, 6, and 7). Why can’t Adams
take only what he needs, one row, the way Get Fuzzy does? I guess Breathed wasn’t completely right about the future of the comics: more page share = better marketing for the merchandising = more profits for the syndicate.
Watterson was absolutely right in bucking the constraints of the
Sunday pages. Today a handful (but sadly, only a handful) of strips
like Zits and Non Sequitur
have benefited from his rebellion. Too bad, on the flip side, we can’t
shove Dilbert back into the smaller amount of space he actually
deserves.
Coincidence of the day: Garfield and Mother Goose & Grimm have very different takes on the pet-owner question, “Do you love me?” Not to belabor my Garfield-bashing,
but Jim Davis, or whoever/whatever’s responsible for that waste of
color ink, can’t even keep his characters in-character. (Perhaps not a coincidence? A commentator here identifies the inker for Garfield as the same as MG&G.)