Is it ethical to hire sherpas when climbing Mount Everest?

By Emily Largent

In “Is it ethical to hire sherpas when climbing Mount Everest?,” a short piece out today in the British Medical Journal, I suggest that the question of whether it is ethical to pay sherpas to assume risks for the benefit of relatively affluent Western climbers is a variant of cases–common in medical ethics–where compensation and assumption of risk coincide.  Consider offers of payment to research subjects, organ sales, and paid surrogacy.  As a result, medical ethics can offer helpful frameworks for evaluating the acceptability of payment and, perhaps, suggest protections for sherpas as we look forward to the next climbing season on Everest.

I owe particular thanks to Nir Eyal, Harvard Medical School Center for Bioethics and Harvard School of Public Health Department of Global Health and Population; Richard Salisbury, University of Michigan (retired); and Paul Firth, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Take a look and let me know what you think.

Be Sociable, Share!
This entry was posted in Emily Largent, Empirical, International, Nir Eyal by elargent. Bookmark the permalink.

About elargent

Emily graduated magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Georgetown University in 2004 with a BS in Science, Technology, and International Affairs. Emily continued her education at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Nursing, graduating summa cum laude in 2006 with a BS in Nursing, after which she worked as a cardiothoracic intensive care unit nurse. From 2008 to 2010, Emily was a fellow in the Department of Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health. Emily was a Petrie-Flom Center Student Fellow during the 2014-2015 academic year.

One thought on “Is it ethical to hire sherpas when climbing Mount Everest?

  1. Nice article, EL. Other instances of this same general phenomenon:
    Is it ethical to hire construction workers to work at the top of tall scaffolding, or alongside speeding traffic?
    Is it ethical to pay football players to smash heads for our entertainment?
    Is it ethical to pay healthcare workers to expose themselves to needle pricks or pandemic influenza?
    I think that counterfactual reasoning is key to understand the consequences of the hire/don’t decision (i.e., are they better off without the job). Then, I think that the most important questions are about how we can make their jobs reasonably safe. Rarely is the best option — for the worker or the society — to eliminate the job.

Comments are closed.