A recent spate of arrests in New York emphasizes the potentially dangerous connection between technology and sex crimes. In a landmark police bust, authorities tracked down and arrested more than seventy people in the New York City area who were trading child pornography. Among those arrested were a rabbi, police chief, nurse, architect, and nanny. Police infiltrated chat rooms where traffickers made available images of children engaged in sex acts with each other and adults.
What is the role of technology in the arrests and distribution of these images? While technology helped officers track down child pornography traffickers, the internet also facilitated the trading of those harmful, illegal images of children. On line chat rooms and other social network spaces provide for the broad-spread, easy distribution of child pornography.
Importantly, the children whose images are trafficked are re-victimized each time their images are shared, bought, and sold. The frequency at which this can occur is intensified over electronic media, opening a horrific floodgate as demonstrated in the New York arrests where thousands of obscene, pornographic images of children were collected from dozens of confiscated laptops. Clearly, solutions to this problem must necessarily emphasize examining technology’s unwelcome dark side.
Penn State’s former president, Graham Spanier, is the latest person to be charged in the fallout involving Jerry Sandusky’s sexual abuse of boys on the Penn State campus. A year ago, I blogged about Spanier’s curiously timed defense of his former staff members following the horrific allegations involving the former, popular football coach.
Jerry Sandusky’s crimes are deplorable. He was convicted of molesting boys from a charity he helped to found (Second Mile) and will serve 30-60 years in prison; he will likely die there. Yet no less problematic were Spanier’s statements immediately following the release of the grand jury’s presentment. Last year, the statement released by Spanier could only be described as cavalier and irresponsible. Spanier claimed that the perjury charges against his former athletic director, Timothy Curley, and Gary Schultz, his senior vice president for finance and business, were “groundless,” and that he has “complete confidence in how they… handled the allegations” against Sandusky. Stunning.
Remember the grand jury report? Schultz said that the allegations were “not that serious” and that he and his colleague “had no indication that a crime had occurred.” What we know now from the Freeh Report is that there were emails between Spanier, Curley, and Schultz about allegations of Sandusky’s showers with boys in the Penn State football locker room. Spanier claims that there may have been emails that he received, but he can’t remember them. He told Jeffrey Toobin in a New Yorker article: “I was apparently copied on two emails…I didn’t reply to them.” A few years later, Michael McQuery (a former graduate student) reported witnessing Sandusky sexually abusing a child in the shower; he also testified before the grand jury.