An outside view on inside waste

Stephen Lewis has an excellent blog post on the declining U.S. dollar. Says Steve, It is an odd state of affairs when the US dollar is closer in value to the currency of a small and corrupt Balkan republic than it is to the common currency of its major economic rival, the European Union. He goes on to examine important points in the histories of the U.S. and Bulgarian economies, with vectors heading in crossing directions. One sample:

A decade ago, an American ambassador to Bulgaria confided in me that US government was quite pleased with Bulgaria’s new gangster capitalists, adding, quite approvingly no less, that “… they are really no different from our own robber barons.” I would disagree. Many of America’s 19th century robber baron industrialists left behind not only the scars of their depredations but also the full infrastructure on which late-19th and early-20th century economies were based on — railroads, steel mills, oil refineries, etc.

He asks,

As the dollar sinks closer to the Bulgarian Lev, the US might consider learning from Bulgaria’s recent experiences. One could almost think the unthinkable: Might the US benefit from having the IMF set up a board to oversee its currency? Might the US benefit from membership candidacy in the EU and the consequent eligibility for proper inspection and maintenance of its physical infrastructure and for bringing its social welfare, income distribution, medical care, and quality of life up to European standards, standards that owe much to America’s Marshall Plan?

It’s a serious question. Ever since the first Nixon administration the U.S. has been in the grip of an economic belief system that dismisses the need for infrastructure investment, and ignores the vast “because effects” of that investment. Even the Republican party’s fondness for thrift has held no sway in recent years.

What would the benefits have been, for example, if the U.S. had invested in infrastructure what Steve calls the near-incomprehensible waste and corruption of the four-year-long debt-financed war in Iraq? The mind boggles.

We need to re-frame the public conversation about infrastructure. However we do that, we need to give full respect to its benefits. Or face driving off some failed bridge on our highway to hell.



3 responses to “An outside view on inside waste”

  1. The problem with this sort of theory – especially one using the I-35 bridge as a jumping off point – is that the bridge in question was under repair at the time it collapsed. You can find reasons for its collapse, but a failure to spend on infrastructure wouldn’t be one of them.

    In fact, spending on road infrastructure isn’t much of a problem in the US at all – billions and billions get spent there every year. To see that, all you need to do is pick a random interstate in the summer and start driving.

    As to the EU’s social welfare and medical system, it’s no panacea: see the unemployment figures (and the follow on social problems they bring) in Germany and France. They have made different choices than us, with different costs. I’m not sure I’d place their set of tradeoffs ahead of ours though.

    As to the costs of the war, in an economy the size of ours, the money we are spending on it is trivial. The better argument is that we are pinching pennies on the war rather than trying to win quickly.

    As to the infrastructure left behind by the robber barons, you might want to read “Empire Express”. The Central Pacific, in order to beat the Union Pacific to milestones, started laying track without grading. Both lines built on the steepest grades possible to avoid blasting costs, and left behind a trans-pacific line that was barely adequate. Before Mr. Lewis pulls an example from history, he might want to actually learn some.

  2. Infrastructure money is too tempting for some people to keep their sticky fingers off of it. For example, the phone companies stole the $200 billion that ratepayers let them charge for fiber to the home.

    In today’s political climate, any money that the USA throws at infrastructure would get snapped up by seekers of corporate welfare, and the infrastructure would be no better off. We need to find honest work for lots of lobbyists before we have a serious conversation about investing in infrastructure.

  3. “The bridge was undergoing redecking work, but nothing structural was being done, U.S. Transportation Department spokesman Brian Turmail said.” Source: http://www.rock102online.com/page6_sub.php?id=86

    Resurfacing of roads happens to create jobs, and because we’ve got way too much shipping via semi-truck instead of by rail. Just because the top of the road is new doesn’t mean its safe or stable.

    In the US we drop people from the unemployment statistics when their temporary benefits run out, which leads to artificially low numbers at best.

    This “war” on terror is going to destroy the United States of America if the present course is continued. We’re 9 TRILLION dollars in debt (again.. that’s the official number… unless you consider all of the money that’s NOT sitting in the Social Security “Trust Fund”)

    This great experiment in Democracy known as the USA is winding down… it lasted far longer than the founding Fathers expected. Perhaps one day some future generation will try again, and have better luck.

    –Mike–

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *