Subscribe to feed
‹ Where would we be without OCD? • The mathematics of legislation ›
December 8, 2007 in Photography, Places, problems, Science | 4 comments
My Flickr DNA reveals that I have 383 photo sets among 17,437 photos, and just just one favorite photograph by anybody else, which is embarrasing.
(Thanks to Mike Warot for the pointer.)
Richard Carter on December 8, 2007 at 6:38 am
That’s not true. I’ve had this one marked as a favourite for ages:
Something must be broken.
Richard Carter on December 8, 2007 at 6:42 am
…Sorry, a link to my favourites would probably help prove my point:
…Search for ‘fire’ to find the photo I mentioned above.
Richard Carter on December 8, 2007 at 6:45 am
…Plus I am a total idiot… Just realised you were referring to your having favourited other people’s photos, no vice versa.
Russell Nelson on December 9, 2007 at 3:07 am
It’s confused about something in my config.
Comments are now closed.
@wjmaggos @profcarroll No. Mass media never placed tracking files on your digital body to report your activities to parties unknown.
About 5 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
The Internet deserves its proper noun bit.ly/upcase1 & in @Medium at bit.ly/upcase2. Yo @brewster_kahle @vgcerf @davewiner
The Internet deserves its proper noun blogs.harvard.edu/doc/2016/05… pic.twitter.com/7I0b38ZTOQ
About 6 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via WordPress.com
Most hated words on @espn on #AppleTV: "An error occurred loading this content. Try again later." And later. And later. Grrr.....
About 7 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@jason_kint Let's have a show of hands (or tweets): who *wants* ads on their phones? (Put down your hand if you're in the business.)
About 8 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
Powered by WordPress and Tarski