Subscribe to feed
‹ Advertising vs. Newspapers • Patent de/reform ›
February 1, 2008 in News | 6 comments
What happens if Microsoft buys Yahoo?
Mike Warot on February 1, 2008 at 2:19 pm
I don’t trust Microsoft with my photos. I’ll pull ALL of them off Flickr as soon as the deal happens.
I’m already starting to invent the future, the post-flickr, post blogger, post typepad, decentralized future that allows me to do social networking without ANY corporate involvement.
How? – I’m starting with strategically placed comments to get the ball rolling in terms of ideas.
Massimo Moruzzi on February 2, 2008 at 6:42 am
AOL – TW redux ?
Nomen Publicus on February 2, 2008 at 2:58 pm
Microsoft + Yahoo = Microsoft
Don Marti on February 2, 2008 at 11:22 pm
Good thread on the SVLUG list.
Mark Quevillon on February 4, 2008 at 4:15 pm
I don’t know what you mean by ANY corporate involvement, given America’s bipolar for-profit and not-for-profit economic system. I prefer open-source solutions like Zimbra when available and turn to Creative Commons ones like Ning when not. It makes me feel like I’m participating in that thing CEOs now call creative capitalism, that last turn of the knife before we all retire in Euros.
webnews on February 5, 2008 at 11:24 am
I think Google’s pathetic complaint about the deal is the best part so far… Google owns search and advertising, so they whine that Microsoft/Yahoo would own too much email? Please.
Comments are now closed.
@profcarroll Why trust the purveyors of what you don't want to help you not want it, when they obviously have no interest in doing so?
About 11 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@Bitly: Dislike the new UI. Way too gimmicky and fancy. Also, what happened to j.mp? Gone or just hidden as an option?
@Ednever @realjohngatto If the kid wants to be an engineer and to learn what it takes. And castes are what IQ testing creates. Been there.
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@johnny_oman I'm sure that's what it said. I'm also sure all those scores are mistakes, since we are not numbers. :-)
About a day ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@Ednever @realjohngatto Different point. When it's used a priori to sort kids into castes, it's wrong.
About a day ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone
Powered by WordPress and Tarski