Subscribe to feed
‹ Forrest on journalism • Appreciating aviation ›
March 24, 2008 in VRM | 1 comment
I’m at Logan, moments from take-off for Los Angeles, so I won’t elaborate on Leveraging Free, my latest post at Linux Journal. Read and follow the links there for much more.
See ya on the far coast…
Crosbie Fitch on March 24, 2008 at 10:21 am
Kelly trips up when he says “When copies are free, you need to sell things which can not be copied.”
Kelly certainly understands the Internet and the folly of attempting to protect the price of copies via anachronistic copyright legislation.
Unfortunately, his conclusion is grievously malformed. He should have said “When copies of things are free, you need to sell the things, not the copies”. It doesn’t matter whether things can be copied, unless you were hoping to profit from a state granted privilege of exclusive sale/manufacture of copies, such as patent or copyright.
For example, it’s quite possible to sell GPL software (free as in speech, not beer) despite the fact that it can be freely copied (without charge). The consequence is not that people give up selling software, but that people give up selling copies of it (except added value affixed thereto).
This doesn’t invalidate the many things that Kelly suggests can also be sold, but it remains perfectly possible to sell digital art despite the market for digital copies becoming quickly saturated.
The value is in the art, not the copy.
That the instantaneous diffusion of the Internet may devalue copies does not consequently devalue the art so copied. The art and its value remains unaffected.
The notion that the value of art resides in each of its copies is an illusion created entirely by copyright.
“When art may be freely copied at negligible cost, sell the art – not copies”
Thus, sell the blockbuster movie – do not try and sell copies. People still value the movie just as much as ever, but the market for copies is over.
Copyright is over.
Comments are now closed.
It's still business sports: publisher vs. adblockers. Not about market demand for the online eqivalent of sunblock. twitter.com/jason_kint/sta…
About 2 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
WTF is this particular security warning? bit.ly/2bliacs If your answer is a long one, post it somewhere or email me. Thanks!
@Suw @TMobile far from perfect, but so much better than the alternatives. No contest, FAIK.
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone
@jackwilliambell also need to know how. And who they share data with or sell it to. Specifically. Thanks!
@jackwilliambell I have heard that @BMW and @VW won't make their cars "Datakraken."
Powered by WordPress and Tarski