Subscribe to feed
‹ What changed, exactly? • On the shore, with flowers ›
July 13, 2008 in Blogging, Ideas | 1 comment
I find myself among the “top ideators” on this list here. Flattered, but why no links? I can see a lot of names and sites on that page I’d like to follow.
Hey, what’s a hierarchy without links to subvert them?
John Caddell on July 13, 2008 at 8:11 pm
I am amazed at how little-used the hyperlink is. My high-school English teacher, Warren Allen Smith, admonished us continually to cite our sources, and the hyperlink is the most efficient, easiest and most direct way to do so (have you searched any book endnotes recently?).
When I read Tim Berners-Lee’s book, “Weaving the Web,” I was amazed how centrally he viewed the hyperlink as a tool of the web. Still, most people don’t use them enough.
Just link, everyone!
Comments are now closed.
@wjmaggos @profcarroll No. Mass media never placed tracking files on your digital body to report your activities to parties unknown.
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
The Internet deserves its proper noun bit.ly/upcase1 & in @Medium at bit.ly/upcase2. Yo @brewster_kahle @vgcerf @davewiner
The Internet deserves its proper noun blogs.harvard.edu/doc/2016/05… pic.twitter.com/7I0b38ZTOQ
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via WordPress.com
Most hated words on @espn on #AppleTV: "An error occurred loading this content. Try again later." And later. And later. Grrr.....
@jason_kint Let's have a show of hands (or tweets): who *wants* ads on their phones? (Put down your hand if you're in the business.)
Powered by WordPress and Tarski