Subscribe to feed
‹ Credits where drew • NPR gets Mashable ›
July 13, 2008 in Past, problems | 6 comments
Still waiting for Riverbend to show up again.
It’s an old question, not asked recently.
Here’s one. Another. Another. Odd how a blogger with such a high profile, once awol, seems forgotten by all but a few. But not by all.
Pingback from Jag har blivit utmanad... | KATTKORGEN on July 13, 2008 at 8:02 pm
DBK on July 14, 2008 at 10:30 am
Odder still, to me, is how small her profile remained, given the nature of her postings, their quality, and their relevance.
Doc Searls on July 14, 2008 at 2:53 pm
DBK, it surprises me too. I think the problem is her silence. Blogging is now. It’s live. Like radio It has archives; but if you’re silent, so is your story.
She was a reporter on the ground in Baghdad. Now she’s not. Folks move on.
But some of us still want to hear from her, because we think her voice is important.
Meanwhile, we wait.
gregory on July 15, 2008 at 1:17 pm
i loved her so much. and the change of tone over the months i read her … another casualty of bush’s war …
Suzi on July 16, 2008 at 2:56 pm
I am realizing that this probably doesn’t go with your post…but I was just popping on your website to see how you are feeling these days…I hope your pancreas is quiet and not at all angry. I am hoping that all the pain and problems are just an unpleasant distant memory for you! I scrolled down and read most of July and didn’t catch that you mentioned anything…I am going to take at as good news! Take Care.
Doc Searls on July 16, 2008 at 3:15 pm
Thanks, Suzi. I’m fine now. Some medical mysteries persist, but they were there before the (unnecessary, it turns out) diagnostic procedure put me in the hospital.
I’m sure the mysteries will turn out to be nothings. That was the bet of the pancreas specialist we met with today.
Still, thanks for asking. I’m back in the game, 15 pounds lighter, and feeling pretty good, really.
Comments are now closed.
@aral see doc.blog/2017/01/06/how…
Yesterday from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@jimfenton Selfish reason: so I can see if the links get clicked on, and when. Otherwise, I do take your points. I'm not a fan.
@MchlCCL @stroker @Peter_Levine @a16z It's about where dependencies lie, work gets done, who's in charge, & how: bit.ly/dstbftr
Also: @JoeAndrieu called this a decade ago in VRM: The user as point of integration. bit.ly/2jo3onO twitter.com/dsearls/status…
The distributed future is personal: bit.ly/dstbftr HTs: @Peter_Levine, @a16z, @agropper @VRM Yo @pmarca @NZN @aral @windley
Powered by WordPress and Tarski