Subscribe to feed
‹ Obituaries on hold • EOLcat ›
November 26, 2008 in Art, Blogging | 3 comments
Ze says this blogger is 12. His hedge, which I second: I will say that if this is some weird viral H&M marketing scheme, I will be very angry.
Phil Hodgen on November 26, 2008 at 7:58 pm
I have a 12 year old daughter who also loves all things fashion, including H & M.
All I can say is that the aesthetic sensibilities displayed on this website are about as far away as you can get from the average 12-year old girl’s.
I call BS.
Emil Sotirov on November 26, 2008 at 8:15 pm
The girl might simply be a good specimen of our extremely self-conscious, narcisistic, “access”-driven, status-driven, trends-driven culture.
In other words – a (self)-marketing scheme embodied.
Doc Searls on November 27, 2008 at 12:26 am
I hate to say I agree, Phil, but I do.
I hope for the girl’s sake that she’s being real.
Comments are now closed.
@agraham999 Bst to know the ads you see aren't based on spying at all. This relieves them of the need to be "relevant," except to the medium
About 4 hours ago from Doc Searls's Twitter via Twitter Web Client
@NirajDawar My point with bit.ly/pr0btrk is that there are many things individuals can do beyond blocking ads. One in particular.
@NirajDawar Do you assume only companies have agency and individuals remain essentially powerless? Serious question.
@stilgherrian There are no innocent bystanders there. Trust me.
@agraham999 @JuliaAngwin @ProPublica @dmarti @VRM & they think relevance requires tracking. It doesn't. Also, branding ≠ relevance, btw.
Powered by WordPress and Tarski