-
Archives
- September 2020
- August 2013
- February 2012
- January 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- December 1969
-
Meta
Hundreds
I was there. This is the only plane to grace our skies in recent history that does not look like it was designed in the 1940’s. It was innovative, fast and sexy. Can you say the same about the A380 or Dreamliner? The aircraft manufacturers seem to be stuck in a timewarp. Is there any other mode of transport that looks the same now as it did in the 40’s? When will the step change – in terms of speed, emissions and passenger comfort – come? When I was a kid in the 1970’s I thought we’d be living the Jetsons life by now !
I worked at Heathrow in the 70,s and Concorde was a living breathing beauty in my book. Only came to an end because the French did not clear the runway properly prior to the accident, and it offered the government the perfect excuse to ground her. sadly missed!