Breast Wars Heat Up – Protest a Bust

Posted on March 8, 2004 by glasscastle

It’s difficult these days to stay abreast of the culture wars. As regular
readers know, breast discrimination is one of the Dowbrigade’s causes
celebres, along with psychopharmacology and the Church of the
Days Later Savings. Frankly, considering most of our lawmakers and
enforcer are male, the fact that male breasts are not only OK in
public but are prominently featured in billboards, in print advertising
and on television while the female variety is verboten is, well,
gay. After all, the only guys we know who actually squirm and feel
uncomfortable around well-formed female breasts are, well, gay.

So let’s call a spade a spade (as well as see how many other groups
can we offend here). Letting men take off their shirts in public while
women
can’t is a sign of the alarming penetration of the homosexual agenda
into the upper reaches of the news and media ruling class in America.
Getting women to bare their breasts in public is a valiant stand in favor
of traditional values, healthy attraction between a man and a women,
and a blow against gay marriage. So get with it folks, let this be the
Summer of Liberation for Unleashing Beautiful Bouncing Breasts (SLUBBB).

Here is the AP
article about the latest battle in the breast wars, a
protest march in Daytona Beach, Florida. Of the thousands of breasts
expected, only about a hundred showed up.  Arrests were made.

Daytona Beach officials had warned the protest would violate city ordinances
against public nudity, disorderly conduct and obstructing sidewalks.
The nudity ordinance requires a "full and opaque covering" of
the nipple and aureola of a woman’s breast, in addition to half of
the surface of the breast below the aureola.

But after a federal judge refused to stop police from arresting female
protesters who doffed their tops, only about 50 women made the march.

And only one, organiser Liz Book, took off her shirt. Book was immediately arrested
and taken to jail, though a bare-chested man who marched was unmolested.

"I don’t ever want to see another woman arrested because someone showed
her breasts," said Book, a 42-year-old Brownie troop leader. "Our
breasts are not criminal."

from the AP
This entry was posted in ESL Links. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Breast Wars Heat Up – Protest a Bust

  1. Steph From Discount Bras says:
    July 27, 2008 at 12:01 am

    I feel that as a Women, I should be allowed to feed my child anytime and at any place, without issue, as nature intended.

    Thank you for that article.

  2. Cheap Bras says:
    October 24, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    I agree with the statement that breasts are not criminal.

    It’s absurd, really.

  3. Michael says:
    June 1, 2009 at 5:59 am

    The chest for ladies is developed to breasts to feed the baby.

  4. Emko says:
    October 22, 2009 at 5:18 am

    michael i totaly agree with you

  5. If It Was A Man Boob says:
    October 24, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    When did natur ebecome a crime? Was she being provocative or sordid? Maybe it is they who need locking up.

  6. Bobby says:
    October 30, 2009 at 3:18 pm

    This is ridiculous. The cops and the ones that sent them to commit this crime against Liz Book should be the ones in jail.
    While I am not generally in favor of anyone going bare torsoed in public, I do not believe it should be labeled criminal.
    For that matter, going totally naked in public should not be defined as a crime. The human body is not obscene. What is done with the body may be a crime, but just the bare body is not obscene.
    Why is it so offensive to many people? Everywhere we go we see animals totally naked. Their penises, scrotums and vulvas are in plain view, and no one is offended or even takes notice. Horses and bovines (cattle) have genitals vastly larger than any human, and no one pays any attention.
    Why do so many believe that harmless behavior that they do not like calls for violence against the one who does it?
    No one is harmed by nakedness except perhaps the one who is naked, who may get a sunburn or frostbite or skid marks if (s)he falls off a bike?
    Even the prophet Isaiah went naked for three years as a statement (Isaiah 20:1-6). He certainly did not do this for prurient purposes, thus did not do wrong.
    Where women are told to dress modestly (I Timothy 2:9-10), the context shows that the apostle was not addressing what particular square inches of skin were exposed or not, but ostentatiousness, showy, expensive fabric, lavish jewelry, etc. Surely the women were conforming to their culture’s dress customs, as that was not a problem then. They didn’t feel a need for laws and sheriffs to punish people for what sq. in. of skin they covered or left exposed.
    Women, and men for that matter, should not have to be concerned if one of the myriad spy cameras that are proliferating will spot them with an arm raised or bending over. Some people are offended by women with unshaven armpits and legs. Should they be arrested, roughed up and tossed in jail? Should a woman whose skirt gets hung, or blown by the wind, be handcuffed and jailed?
    Washington state has decriminalized women being bare above the hips (I don’t know exactly where they draw the “line”). Women there were tired of being harassed for letting a nipple show for a moment when feeding their babies.
    Let clothing or the lack thereof be controlled by custom and social pressure, not by guns, chains and prisons.

  7. Lucas says:
    February 11, 2010 at 6:45 pm

    What a joke!!!

  8. jewelry says:
    February 26, 2010 at 7:05 am

    Can’t believe that, thats crazy. Thanks for sharing!

  9. mexican says:
    March 17, 2010 at 1:58 am

    This is really not right, but interesting.

    mexican jewelry

  10. Jess says:
    April 9, 2010 at 12:35 pm

    I wish she had kept her shirt on!

  11. silpada jewelry says:
    April 30, 2010 at 11:17 am

    Great posting, Thanks for very useful information. I’m sure to visit your site again. Please keep posting.

  12. Livechat says:
    May 6, 2010 at 2:02 am

    Wouw, not bad

Comments are closed.