SANTA FE — New Mexico has taken its fight against drunken driving to men’s restrooms around the state. The state has ordered 500 talking urinal cakes that will deliver a recorded anti-DWI message to bar and restaurant patrons who make one last pit stop before getting behind the wheel. The top of the devices feature the state DWI slogan — "You drink, you drive, you lose." Some Albuquerque bars installed the devices this week. And the state Transportation Department plans to distribute them to Santa Fe bars and restaurants as well as establishments in Farmington, Gallup and Las Cruces. The state spent $21 for each talking urinal cake for the pilot program but will ask bars and restaurants to pay for future orders if the idea catches on. from KOAT New Mexico Turns out this is nowhere near as interesting as it could be. How about urinals that automatically do alcohol testing on the stream of urine? Think about it. All over America deadly dangerous drunken drivers on interstate highways are giving voluntary samples proving their guilt in the crime they are in the act of committing – and we ignore it! The electronic urinal could issue a warning in cases where it detects a slight level of alcohol A small speaker mounted inconspicuously above and behind the miscreant could announce, in a menacing State Police style voice, "Excuse me, sir. It looks like you’ve had a few drinks tonight. Are you absolutely sure you are in control of your vehicle and your judgment. The State Police advise you to remain at this rest area until your blood alcohol level has fallen. Should you be apprehended for driving under the influence, your licence will be suspended. Coffee is available is vending machines outside this rest room." In cases in which the blood alcohol level is above the legal limit, a direct alarm to the State Police Headquarters would be activated. A micro-camera facing the pisser head-in would record his features for posterity. The steely voice could announce, "You are in violation of State Law 156.88, Driving Under the Influence. Remain where you are. Do not attempt to return to your vehicle. If you do so you will be charged with leaving the scene of a crime." The arrangement to catch female drunk drivers will have to be slightly modified, but we will leave it to a female expert to design the modifications. Once the drunk driver has been identified, cameras mounted in the parking lots will follow him back to his car, recording the make, model and licence. How, you may ask, will the system avoid molesting drunk passengers? Simple! The answer lies in the selfsame parking lot cameras. At such close distances, they can record every face that gets out of a driver’s seat, and match them to the urinal cams! The technology exists today; it isn’t rocket science, and it isn’t even that expensive. As to the invasion of privacy objections – wise up, wimps. Drunk drivers kill thousands of innocent people, men, women and children, every year. Using technology to get them off the streets should be a no-brainer. The only problem we can envision is that once the plan goes into effect, drinkers will stop going to the bathroom, at least in the available public facilities. Some will try to hold it in. We now know, thanks to radio station KDND-FM, how dangerous that can be. Some will piss in empty bottles, beer cans, plastic bags, tennis ball cans, or try to. Others, desperate, will try to piss in bushes, ditches, or median strips, and be arrested for urinating in public. Many will end up pissing their pants, or their upholstery. At any rate, drivers with alcohol in their piss would be severely inconvenienced Actually, that could be the most entertaining aspect of the entire effort. Lives would be saved, and hilarity ensued. |
-
Archives
- September 2020
- August 2013
- February 2012
- January 2012
- September 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- June 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- December 1969
-
Meta
This is a pretty brilliant idea! I wonder if it would create a fuss with some of the civil liberty activists, because it does kind seem kind of 1984-esque when you consider the potential for mistakes with drunken passengers. I think it would be pretty effective if the video monitoring was good.
This is an interesting use of technology. If it will keep drunk drivers off the road, it will be well worth it. It’s sad how many lives are ruined by drunk drivers every year.
Personal breathalyzer testers should be given out free of charge at these bars to control drunk driving.
This article brings up some good points, about preventitive measures to stop drunk driving from occuring, even though the measures seem a bit comical.