SENIOR SYNTHESIS

Snapshots of Harvard undergraduate economics research

  • Home
  • About

Gender and Advising in Undergraduate Research: Evidence from the Harvard Hoopes Prize

April 28, 2021 sonyakalara 2021 Senior Theses

By Sonya Kalara

Do women win the Hoopes Prize, an undergraduate award for thesis-writing at Harvard College, more often than men? Does the gender makeup of the advising team affect the probability that their student will go on to win the Hoopes?

I break down the timeline between enrollment at the college and Hoopes acquisition into three stages: Pathway, Connection, and Evaluation.

  • In the pathway stage, a student is enrolled at Harvard, they choose a concentration, and they choose to write a thesis. Whereas Harvard College at large has a 50/50 gender split, gender representation in different concentrations varies massively.
  • In the connection stage, a student decides to write a thesis, and chooses their advising team. The literature on this topic indicates that students search for same-gender advisors and so we’d expect that gender “dyads” (m/f combinations) would exhibit some skew.
  • Thirdly, in the evaluation stage, a student is nominated for the prize by at least one member of their advising team. Although the nomination phase is crucial, all information about Hoopes nominees is confidential, therefore this piece isn’t directly included in my analysis. Finally, a student is selected for the Hoopes Prize and we expect that this selection from the pool of nominated writers exhibits variance.

 

Pathway Stage

I compare the number of graduating seniors in each department to the number of thesis writers. This allows me to calculate the average number of women in a concentration that go on to write a thesis as compared to the average number of men. Surprisingly, for all 9 concentrations that I study, women are more likely to write theses than men. Although this result wasn’t statistically significant in all concentrations, the evidence suggests that the rate at which women write theses is not the broken rung in the Hoopes evaluation process.

 

Connection Stage

Figure 1 shows all of the different pairs between advising teams and students by gender. A further subdivision by concentration is included in the full thesis; the volume of each pair varies widely by department. However, this graph should demonstrate at a general level that there exists some assortative matching.

After establishing that this pattern of seeking same-gender advisors exist within specific concentrations, I used statistics to randomly assign advisors to students. I then compared this “predicted distribution” to the actual rates of student/advisor matching and I find that students search for same-gender advisors, and women are more likely to seek out female advisors in male-dominated concentrations.

Evaluation Stage

Figure 2 shows the proportion of Hoopes Winners in every concentration by gender. I use OLS to investigate how the probability of winning a Hoopes Prize differs by student and advisor gender. First, in most concentrations, there is some baseline probability that women with at least one female advisor will win the prize. The mathematical evidence is mixed regarding the relative (dis)advantage of being a male student and having an all-male advisor team doesn’t appear to be particularly advantageous for female students. Interestingly, it appears that any advantage male students have is almost entirely quashed if they have an all-male advisor team. This evidence indicates that the most productive pairing is between male students and female advisors.

  • « The Effects of Experience and Technological Innovation in the Offshore Wind Industry
  • The Effect of COVID-19 Eviction Moratoria on School Enrollment »

Recent Posts

  • Decarbonization in Doubt: Evaluating the Uncertainty of the Indirect Land Use Change Carbon Intensity Estimates of Corn Ethanol
  • The Effect of COVID-19 Eviction Moratoria on School Enrollment
  • Gender and Advising in Undergraduate Research: Evidence from the Harvard Hoopes Prize
  • The Effects of Experience and Technological Innovation in the Offshore Wind Industry
  • Warm Glow from Voting vs. Direct Costs: Evidence from the 2020 Election, Black Lives Matter Protests, and Mail-in Balloting
  • Attributing Changes in Teen Sexual Behaviors to Reproductive Health Education and Publicly Funded Clinics

Categories

  • 2020 Senior Theses
  • 2021 Senior Theses
  • 2022 Senior Theses
  • Uncategorized

Tags

aid Anli Chen behavioral behavioral economics biofuels carbon offsets china chinese aid climate change corn ethanol development econ economics education energy transition environmental economics foreign gene therapy harvard hemophilia income and religion income inequality industrial organization Integration intergenerational mobility International Economics Investment labor markets labor matching law market entry prosocial race and religion religion reputation Savings social capital social networks social norms Thesis two-sided matching urban wealth welfare Wesley Cash
Proudly powered by WordPress
Protected by Akismet • Blog with WordPress