As Dave Bear-y might say: “I’m not making this up.” For the past two days,
a big story around these parts has been the discovery of a severed hand in the
frontyard of a suburban home near Albany, NY. (“Big Story: Dismembered hand
found in Guilderland,” WTEN.com, Feb. 18, 2005) The remains, which
appeared to be a “man’s hand,” were found in a surgical glove, covered in
blood, with the finger tips removed; a Christmas ribbon was nearby.
“snowFlakesN” A helicopter, a backhoe, and dogs helped a squad of cops search the
area for hours, seeking the rest of the body. Pathologists at Albany Medical Center
decided to x-ray the human hand today, when they discovered that it was not human.
(“Discovered remains not human,” CapitalNew9, Feb. 19, 2005; film clip, too) Instead,
it is the claw of an animal made to look human. The current working hypothesis is that
the claw used to belong to a bear. Get more details here. Stay tuned.
Next time I tell you all the news around here is weird or embarrassing,
I hope you’ll believe me.
boars and bears
are my neighbors…
winter seclusion
red-bearded grandpa’s
grafted branch…
his hand still steady
ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue
Meanwhile, over here on the “wrong” side of the high-
a fuss over PodCasts. I’m sure glad I’m not an employer or supervisor
having to keep all the kiddies on task while on the job. Too many distractions
in this world of ours, says haikuEsq, and Prof. Yabut concurs (along with
Ann Althouse, it appears).
The f/k/a gang is pleased to say that we picked up one of those new-fangled
telephone contraptions and had our first transcontinental communication with Pasadena
today. George M. Wallace really exists — and he’s got a landline in the Forest. Too cool.
by dagosan:
digital age:
aging digits
at the keyboard
February 20, 2005
it’s just a bear, paw
February 19, 2005
help abolish lawyer tyranny
sat. pm potluck
1] Sorry, Mom, I can’t help ya: Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Bar’s
ULP Opinion 207 (Feb. 18, 2004), which concluded that a lawyer-trained social worker
would be guilty of the unlawful practice of law by assisting pro se litigants in the preparation,
or even the selection, of forms for Small Claims Court. Virginia’s Bar Council met today (Feb.
19) in Richmond to consider approving, disapproving or modifying the opinion.
The legal reform group HALT (f/k/a Help Abolish Legal Tyranny) submitted
comments to the Virginia State Bar on Feb. 17, 2005, pointing out that Virginia’s
Small Claims courts require the use of unusually difficult forms and, “The vast majority
of Virginia small claims litigants are unable to complete court forms unassisted. If the
Virginia Small Claims Division is to serve any meaningful function as an accessible
arbiter of justice, litigants must be allowed to use the assistance of nonlawyers.” HALT
has a small claims reform project that is fighting for the use of plain-English forms and
in-person assistance to consumers at the courts.
2] HALT‘s Feb. 16, 2005 newsletter suggests that bar groups are continuing to act like
guilds — putting their interests before clients’ interests and rights — while courts have
been at the forefront of assisting pro se litigants and the self-help legal movement. Examples:
The Georgia State Bar may adopt a proposal preventing nonlawyers from
drafting articles of incorporation.
The Montana State Bar Association is “gagging” consumers from speaking
publicly about their complaints against lawyers. A consumer will face punishment
if she decides to disclose to anyone, including family membersand friends, that she
has filed a complaint.
In January 2005, the Wisconsin Board of Governors rejected the new ABA Ethics
2000 rule requiring written fee agreements.
On the other hand, thank you, Your Honor:
Throughout 2005, one of Hawaii’s family courts will hold monthly sessions of
“Divorce Law in Hawaii,” a free session for the public offering an overview on
the process and tips on finding self-help resources.
Wisconsinites going through a divorce will have a new resource starting in spring
2005. The court system is putting the finishing touches on a project to create a set
of standardized pro se divorce forms that can be used throughout the state. These
forms will be available in courthouses and on the state’s Web site.
Sam B., click for original
3] Now I understand: It appears that both Prof. Steven Bainbridge and his then-puppy, Sam,
were exposed to significant amounts of Purple Snow a number of years ago. Given the well-
known effects of purple rain and purple haze on other celebrities, the weblawgger a/k/a Prof. B.
can perhaps be excused for actin’ funny and asking “is it tomorrow or just the end of time?”
Speaking of the scent of money, given the extraordinary canine sense of
smell [50 to 100 times better than that of humans, per this source, and “thousands of times”
better, per this report], I wonder which wines are Sam’s favorites — and whether Sam is a
scattering onto
my purple sleeves…
spring snow
on purple clouds
when will I set sail?
western sea
ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue
Declare Victory, and then Do It Again: I got an email today from the Not One Damn Dime folks.
Despite our skepticism over slacktivism, the NODDites claim their spending-boycott on Inauguration Day
“was a huge success.” And, on April 15th they’re gonna do nothing again — this time for the cause of
“responsible spending.” I like the cause. However, the now-revealed initiator of NODD, communications
professional and political junkie, Pete Smith of Minnesota, does not seem to be in touch with political
reality. (Pete and Daily Kos’ Rabid Nation might have to take a paternity test to settle just who is the
progenitor of NODD.)
faint first star
Such a pleasant Saturday. Before heading out to a sunny winter day, I just
“strolled” my favorite haiku garden and found one of my favorite haiku poets.
As a result, here are three poems from The Heron’s Nest by George Swede: “thnLogoF”
ebb tide
the sand castle moat
still showing clouds
old tombstone
losing its name
faint first star
George Swede from The Heron’s Nest – a haikai journal
potluck
“tinyredcheck” Frankly, my morning was not all pleasant. I spent time at MyShingle
“discussing” reasonable contingency fees with Eugene, at a post that had
been about needing to have retainer agreements. (I don’t start these fights.
I just point out the logical responsibilities that go with professional & fiduciary
duties, and the primacy of the client’s, not the lawyer’s interests.)
Mike “Fedster” Cernovich never stops making work for me. Please
go to C&F and answer his question: Is a public defender system better for
indigent clients than having assigned counsel? Or as Mike puts it: “Is Mr.
Giacalone right?” that PDs are better.
Thanks to Bob Ambrogi and Kevin Heller for pointing to Evan D.
Brown’s new Internet Cases weblog — a topic of interest to many of us.
February 18, 2005
with ice-floes jammin’ down the block
last night’s snow down river
snow now rain–
your picture
by mine
green light
from a green bottle
winter morning
potluck
“tinyredcheck” If you’re interested in the fairness of our criminal justice system, you need to read the recently
posted “Gideon’s Broken Promise: America’s Contnuing Quest for Equal Justice” (ABA Standing Committee
on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, 2004) (pointer from Legaline). I agree with each of its major Findings:
#1 Forty years after Gideon v. Wainwright, indigent defense in the United States remains
in a state of crisis, resulting in a system that lacks fundamental fairness and places poor
persons at constant risk of wrongful conviction.
#2 Funding for indigent defense services is shamefully inadequate. The lack of funding impacts
on virtually every aspect of indigent defense systems.
#3 In addition to providing constitutionally adequate representation, lawyers who defend the
indigent also are required to provide representation that is “competent,” as required by rules
of professional conduct. . . . Yet, defense lawyers for the indigent sometimes are unable to or
do not comply with this and other requirements, and as a nation we tolerate substandard
representation in indigent defense that is not acceptable practice on behalf of paying clients.
However, ethical violations routinely are ignored not only by the lawyers themselves, but also
by judges and disciplinary authorities.
I also agree that indigent defendants are far more likely to receive consistently competent representation
in a system with fulltime public defenders (with statewide monitoring and funding) than from situations
that rely heavily on assigned counsel. (see prior post)
what does it mean that one-third of Massachussetts legislators are
lawyers, but Massachusetts Bar Advocates went 25 years without a pay raise?
“tinyquestionN” Norm Pattis is looking for suggestions on how law school or CLE could better help lawyers to
deal with the irrational and unhealthy demands and desires of clients (and of law firms). Stop over to Crime
& Federalism and give Norm a little counseling. [I suggested that we can learn a lot from the training given
to social workers in jobs such as Child Protective Services, and who deal daily with highly agitated, angry people, and yet remain unflappable but caring.]
Todd Zywicki at Volokh Conspiracy frets over George Mason Univ. being the “other, other George” among
the three D.C. Area colleges, pointing to ESPN coverage. When I was a college student in the late ’60’s, going
to Georgetown, there was only one other George in town. Of course, there is no confusing George Washington
and Georgetown with GMU in the great Ideology Games played out daily here in weblog world and Washington.
Bob Ambrogi points to two weblogs with what he calls “stunning design,” saying they show
“how creative design can help strengthen the impact of a blog.” I looked at Symtym and Patent Baristas, and I
don’t get it. For me, large graphics in a masthead or sidebar add absolutely nothing positive to my opinion of
a weblog or the chance I will return to it. And, dark backgrounds (especially with patterns) detract considerably
from the reading experience. Lisa Stone wonders if you care: pared-down or gussied up?
update (7 PM): Thanks to Tara’s pointer at ResearchBuzz, I updated my Google Toolbar
yesterday. I’ve been playing with its new “WordTranslator: hover your cursor over a word
and the WordTranslator feature will display the word in French, Italian, German, Spanish,
Chinese (simplified and traditional), Japanese, or Korean.” However, my Windows XP Pro
has completely shut itself down three times, after running very slowly, without asking my
permission, today. Has anyone else had a similar problem? Tara?
February 17, 2005
dandelion ghosts
no wind today —
the cottonwoods
speak in chickadee
long winter–
prayer bundles sway
in the cedars
breezy afternoon–
dandelion ghosts
float past the daisies
“snowflakeSN” Billie Wilson from The Heron’s Nest – a haikai journal
“no wind today” (special mention, Valentine’s Issues, Feb. 2005)
I just learned today that Sen. Barack Obama was among the 18 Democrats voting
for the Class Action Reform Act last week. All 26 opposing senators were Democrats.
Obama appears to have adopted the popular (with me too) anti-coupon position, but
maybe also the Madison County-bashing. According to the Kansas City Star (Feb. 10, 2005):
Barack Obama, D-Ill., said in a statement afterward that he had voted for the
bill even though he is “a strong believer” in class-action lawsuits.”When multimillion-
dollar settlements are handed down and all the victims get are coupons for a free
product, justice is not being served,” he said. “And when cases are tried in counties
only because it’s known that those judges will award big payoffs, you get quick
settlements without ever finding out who’s right and who’s wrong.”
Of course, f/k/a is still waiting for a fuller explanation of Obama’s Tort Reform position.
I can’t understand why it would be shocking to learn that some companies are firing
employees for things they have posted at their weblogs concerning the company. (See CNN/Money
article) Would we be shocked that an employee was canned for putting nasty remarks about a
supervisor, or proprietary information, on a roadside billboard? If the electronic communication
device in question were a telephone, wouldn’t you want to know the facts before getting huffy?
People get so myopic when they think their ox is being gored.
I finally got a Site Meter two weeks ago and have compared the Daily Hits numbers from my
Harvard weblog server over a 24-hour period with the Site Meter results. On one
representative day, I found that Site Meter Page Hits were 5.9% of the Harvard Hits, and
on another they were 4.7% of the Harvard Hits.
Where do they get these slogans? New York City wants to trademark a new
tourism slogan “The World’s Second Home” — which is only going to remind folks of
the line about it being a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there. In general, I
think telling people your self-proclaimed status is not very effective. If they want the home
theme, why not “New York City — Make Yourself at Home” or “We’ll Make You Feel at
Home”? On the other hand, who travels to feel at home?
All kidding aside, for a moment, Steve Bainbridge has some very good questions
for his fellow conservatives on private Social Security accounts. Check his TrackBacks and
decide whether their answers are persuasive.
“tinyredcheck” Speaking of weblog persuasion, Lisa Stone at Legal Blog Watch quotes a couple
Law.com luminaries who seem riled by the MSM-weblog-what’s-journalism? debate. Prof. Eugune
Volokh thinks the analogy of webloggers to lynch mobs is very weak. And J. Craig Williams wonders
“After all, if you have a legal question, who would you rather hearthe answer from? A newspaper
reporter who asked a lawyer? Or from a lawyer who’s also a highly respected law professor?” While
I agree that some weblogs are journalism (but many don’t even try to be), I also believe that:
(1) Webloggers have the ability to create giant “opinion bubbles” that are based on weak or
misunderstood facts, yet have persuasive or coercive force that is totally unconnected to reason,
logic, virtue, or facts. The “lynch mob” effect is fueled very often by such anger and vile — and
ideologically-based agendas — that the target can be easily overwhelmed and left without allies.
(e.g., the Durango Cookie Case, where the girls were flooded with gifts and tv invitations and
Mrs.Young ended up flooded with hate mail and phone calls, and death threats, before she had
any chance to get her facts out.)
(2) I know of no source more likely to give a skewed response on an issue than a law professor
who’s already stated an opinion publically on the issue in question. There are some legal
journalistswho do a darn good job at figuring out the law without asking a lawyer or a law
professor.
(3) Too many folks with weblogs have a hard time understanding that their opinion is not
necessarily truth and comes filtered through their own ideological and experiential perspectives.
I know this last blurb violates yesterday’s pledge to keep things short, but Lisa made me do it.
what Prof. B won’t do
“tinyredcheck” Steve Bainbridge has assured his readership that — tip jars and cable-organizer ads
aside — he would not auction off space on his pregnant tummy just to make a few
bucks. (I don’t make these things up.)
In the law (and religion) biz, we call that turning necessity into virtue. With Gov. Arnold
being sort of busy, I wonder how Steve would feel about tummy ads, if he were to star
in the sequel to “Junior.” Hmmmm.
It seems that Prof. B won’t be buying any Dogs Playing Poker original
paintings, either. On aesthetics grounds, on with him — although the old posters have
always made me smile. Of course, the buyer of the two paintings from the series this
week, for $590,4000, might be counting on this being a smart investment.
“I was intrigued to learn that the artist, C. M. Coolidge is “credited with
creating the life-size Boardwalk cutouts into which one’s head is placed,
allowing the person to be photographed as a character or animal.
“Coolidge was also a banker, shopkeeper, inventor and painter. He even
penned an opera.” (CNN.com article)
You’ll probably only get $10 for your old Poker Dogs poster.
tripping over the dog
again…
night of winter rain
ISSA, translated by D.G.Lanoue
A gray dawn —
last night’s poker cards
facedown on the table
& Modern Haiku XXX:3
February 16, 2005
dagosan’s scrapbook — Feb. 2005
– below are haiku and senryu written by “dagosan“, this weblog’s Editor, David A. Giacalone. most have been on the Home Page, some are outtakes and rewrites. each is a work in progress. i hope they show improvement over time and encourage others to try writing haiku –
– click here for dagosan’s archive –
a three-engine freight train
delays lunch —
two stomachs rumble
[Feb. 28, 2005]
offering a kiss —
she eagerly shares
calories
[Feb. 27, 2005]
a huge yellow moon —
our argument fogs
the windshield
we all help
blow out the candles —
dad’s 86th birthday
[Feb. 26, 2005]
a dear aunt’s cluttered desk —
checking email
from her guest room
[Feb. 25, 2005]
pleasantly surprised
again —
full moon at the window
[Feb. 24, 2005]
middle finger
papercut
middle finger
afraid to look
under the bed —
dust dinosaurs sleep
[Feb. 23, 2005]
bookstore
history section —
two honest presidents
[Feb. 21, 2005]
the visiting twin—
driving alone
into a snow storm
[Feb. 21, 2005]
business lunch
starts with a compliment —
he raises his knife
[Feb. 20, 2005]
digital age:
aging digits
at the keyboard
[re-do]
cirrus clouds and
a dusting of snow —
the midday moon is shedding
[Feb. 19, 2005]
pink clouds
in the bare oak’s crotch
the street-walker stares
[Feb. 18, 2005]
travel plans
penciled in*
*winter’s asterisk
[Feb. 17, 2005]
dust on the spine
of each cookbook —
soup can in the sink
[Feb. 16, 2005]
where two boys
ice-fished yesterday —
two ducks swim
[Feb.15, 2005]
valentine for
an apostate son —
novena card from mom
[Feb. 15, 2005]
— Valentines
from relatives
[Feb. 14, 2004 & 2005]
honest Abe —
no one wears his hat
or fills his shoes
[Feb. 12, 2005]
warmed by the sun
lit by the moon —
icy porch steps
[Feb.11, 2005]
valentine sun
warms the kitchen —
tuna melt for lunch
[Feb.10, 2005]
wondering where
they go in winter —
pond frogs and children
[Feb.9, 2005]
can’t reach
the triple-word score —
the dog whines for table scraps
[Feb.9, 2005]
sad chirp of
the smoke detector —
another low battery
[Feb.8, 2005]
today
the sun sets too slowly —
driving westward
[Feb.7, 2005]
at the sink
squinting at sunrise
and saturday’s dishes
[Feb.6, 2005]
sunset tints
the cloudbank pink —
avoiding yellow snow
[Feb.5, 2005]
can’t take my eyes off
the bird in flight —
wanting to know its name
[Feb.4, 2005]
window view
icicle and branch —
branch
[Feb. 2, 2005]
the dust settles
through the open door . . .
her smile doesn’t forgive
all my sins
the daughter taps flour
into a mixing bowl . . .
mother’s apron tight
cedar walking cane
hangs from the coat rack
dust on the handles curves
“schoolBrooks” Randy Brooks, from School’s Out (Press Here, 1999)
“tinyredcheck” Issue-spotting 101: It seems that some of the greatest professorial minds
in the weblawg world never thought about Weblog Tips as possibly being income.
TaxProffer Paul Caron sets ’em straight. Where did you land on the test curve?
Ealier today, I noticed that there were 32 hits on my Referer List for the Google
inquiry “Ten Most Dangerous
Foods to Eat While Driving. Speaking of issue spotting, try to guess them and their order
before clicking for the article from Insurance.com. (okay, a hint: Coffee is #1, Chocolate #10.)
And click for a Safe Driving Lesson Plan for grades 9-12 (Joy Brewster,
discovery.com).
I agree with Carolyn Elefant that writing about the ethical lapses of others can be
humbling. She asks today whether lawyers who end up swamped with discipline violations
were salvageable or are inherently bad. Both kinds exist, I am sure.
“tinyquestion” Have you noticed how many USA-born webloggers spell the word “gray” with an
“e” [“grey”]? I even caught myself about to do it last week. Affectations-R-Us. The
Fool in the Forest would at least have the excuse of hanging around a lot of British poets. Not so
him, him, or him. Of course, some of us naturally straddle the fence.
Personally, I’m not as fond of the adjective “outrageous” as some webloggers seem to
be. Before hurling verbal grenades or nukes (as opposed to raising a red flag or shooting a warning
shot in the air), it makes sense to consider the source of the story and go to some level-headed and
original sources. Sometimes you’ll find the extremists were right, but creating unwarranted cynicism
doesn’t seem to be a helpful goal.
“tinyquestionN” Ever wonder What Do Exit Polls and Flu Vaccine Shortages Have in Common?
An essay by Bert Foer, Bob Lande, and Mike Scherer, of the American Antitrust Institute offers an
answer. (Hint: it’s not just bad luck; think: excessive concentration, too few alternative sources).
“tinyredcheck” The saddest thing about Charlie Rose‘s interview last night with the Godfathers of
Blog was their agreement that they all get enormous amounts of intensely angry and ugly messages.
Second worse thing: they all forgot to add the “we” back to “blog.”
potluck light
again left me exhausted and wondering whether I’ll ever learn the lessons my body
keeps trying to teach me. With my renewed discipline, I shall spare you the details
(but see precursor post), and point to the new tag line in my masthead. I’ve replaced
hope the change reminds me to take myself less seriously, and to keep haiku
in the spotlight and center-stage.
From now on, in addition to a haiku entree, look for very brief pointers
to things elsewhere on the Web that interest me. Expect many of the same topics
that have obsessed ethicalEsq, Prof. Yabut and Jack Cliente. This won’t be an all-
you-can-eat buffet. Call it potluck novelle — tastier, healthier, and less fattening.
three meals a day
this trip, living large!
winter storm clouds
flitting butterfly–
after supper, a temple
pilgrimage
coming to lunch
on the sleeping man…
mosquito
the farmer’s lunch
dangles…
on the scarecrow
February 15, 2005
sorry, pardner . . .
. . . but, maybe we’re not both covered. The fight over Medicare covering “lifestyle drugs”
(A/P, Feb. 2. 2005) is quite complicated. See “Lifestyle drugs: Issues for Debate,” by Joel
Lexchin, M.D., CMAJ, May 16, 2001). Whether private insureds or taxpayers should help
oldtimers and Baby Boomers to extend their youth, by underwriting treatments for “ailments”
like male pattern baldness or erectile dysfunction is a very big financial and social issue.
Dr. Lexchin broaches many of the issues in his CMAJ article and states:
“If we as a society decide that lifestyle drugs should be covered through the
health care system, then other treatments may not get funded or at least will
not get as much funding as they otherwise would have. Decisions will also be
needed about who will get the drugs (since almost everyone will want one or
more of them) and whether they will be available in unlimited supply.
“. . . We need to find mechanisms whereby all elements of society — government,
industry, health care professionals, patients and consumers — can participate in
the decisions.”
On Feb. 13, as the Sunday talking heads wrung their hands over this, and conservative
Republicans said they must “revisit” the Medicare drug coverage of lifestyle drugs (despite a
Presidential veto threat for any attempts to decrease coverage), I could not help but note —
speaking of lifestyle choices — that by next Valentine’s Day Medicare could be paying for two
[or more?] Cialis prescriptions for the aging partners in one household. Can you say “unintended
consequences,” Mr. President? (or extended side effects?)
Perhaps, you’ll have to have a Designated Consort or a Marriage
License to get ED drugs.
. . . but, maybe this weblog income ain’t worth the trouble. Prof.
Bainbridge explains, in detail and persuasively, why group weblogs that bring
in income are probably partnerships under Section 202(a) of the Uniform
Partnership Act (1997). Seems to me, that if the basic tackiness of using ads
and begging-jars on your site is not enough to stop such practices, the
added aggravation of partnership issues for group weblogs should tip the
balance toward keeping them lucre-free. If you still won’t give up group
advertising and mendicity, Prof. B has a book for you, of course. I’m willing
to bet that Steve will stay solo in the blogiverse.
. . . but, I gotta rat on ya. In its February edition, the ABA Journal
reports on a new ABA ethics opinion [Formal Opinion 04-433 (2004)] under
Model Rule 8.3. Here’s the synopsis:
Obligation of a Lawyer to Report Professional Misconduct by
a Lawyer Not Engaged in the Practice of Law
A lawyer having knowledge of the professional misconduct of
another licensed lawyer, including a non-practicing lawyer, is
obligated under Model Rule 8.3 to report such misconduct if it
raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trust-
worthiness, or fitness as a lawyer. The professional misconduct
must be reported even if it involves activity completely removed
from the practice of law. If the report would require revealing the
confidential information of a client, the lawyer must obtain the
client’s informed consent before making the report.
The f/k/a gang agrees. Having asserted that lawyers “need to remember
that ethics rules apply even when it takes courage to comply,” we applaud
the Ethics Committee. The Journal article concludes as follows:
The ethics committee acknowledges in its opinion that reporting
a colleague’s misconduct, particularly if that lawyer is a supervisor,
can be awkward and uncomfortable, and it even may put the reporting
lawyer’s career in jeopardy. But, the committee emphasizes, “Because
the legal profession enjoys the privilege of regulating itself, it is
critically important that its members fulfill their responsibility to stand
guard over the profession’s integrity and high standards.”
On the other hand, lots of very good ABA Formal Ethics Opinions are consistenly
ignored by bar Counsel and lawyers across the land.
“tinyredcheck” . . . but, I won that Valentine’s Day divorce.
Someone named Heidi won the WKRL-FM contest, and the overvalued legal services of
Brad S. Margolis. I sent an email to attorney Margolis and the radio station on Sunday,
asking whether I got the facts straight in my post the valentine-divorce lawyer. Neither
has responded. Our expose didn’t even make it into the list compiled by the station under
the heading “Not EVERYONE Liked the Idea of That Damn Morning Show giving away a
divorce” We didn’t garner any media attention either (but got some agita at Carolyn’s place).
However, I’m pleased to say that the posting is the #3 result at Google for the search inquiry
update II (Feb. 16, midnite): Lawyer Brad S. Margolis contacted me twice this
vening. In his first email, he noted “I am not getting anything for this promotion,
In fact I am even paying 100 percent of the filing fees out of my own pocket.”
On the issue of his flat fee for uncontested divorces, Margolis stated:
“Yes my online fees are less than my in office fees, that is to make legal
fees affordable to people who are lucky to have money for food. . . .
“As and for what the cost of an uncontested Divorce is I believe that
the figure quoted is not incorrect and online prices which you should
know are far less than in office cases. Just a matter of common sense,
which apparently you lacked in your biased appraisal of my actions.
When I responded with more questions, he wrote back and clarified that “in
many cases I do charge that fee for an uncontested divorce. [Y]es I do discount
my web services as I find the overhead of the web office much lower than the
high priced rent I must factor in to some of my offices.”
I wrote back to say I can’t imagine how the cost of clients attracted online can
be so significantly lower as to warrant the difference between $1000 and $375.
I also noted that I continue to believe that $1000 is too much for what Margolis
himself called the “paper-pushing” of an uncontested divorce. Readers will
have to decide for themselves whether “The approximate retail value of
Uncontested Divorce is $1,000.00.”
the tea smoke
and the willow
dance partners
ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue
Sister Rose’s Faith
Whether or not it wins an Oscar for best short documentary this month, and before I’ve even
seen it, I want to declare the film “Sister Rose’s Passion” a rousing success — because it is the
proximate cause of my learning the story of Sister Rose Thering. Charlie Rose’s [no relation]
interview with film producer/director Oren Jacoby last night (Feb. 14, 2005) filled me with awe
and gratitude for a spunky woman who almost single-handedly made the Catholic Church
reconsider and change its policy toward the Jewish people.
As a girl in Wisconsin, Rose Thering could not understand how a just and loving God
could condemn an entire race for the death of Jesus — even two millennia later. Her interest resulted
in doctoral research which “played a significant role in the 1965 Vatican document Nostra Aetate
(Our Time), which formally declared that Jews were not responsible for the death of Jesus.”
(Seton Hall Univ. News, “Sister Rose’s Passion nominated for Academy Award,” by Catherine
Memory)
There are many lessons to learn from Sister Rose, including: (1) that one person with passion for a
cause can make a very big difference, even starting from the bottom of a powerful hierarchy that
would like to silence the dissenting view; and (2) that knowledge and reason can at times get even an
“infallible” Church, a self-proclaimed final interpreter of God’s Will, to admit a major historic mistake .
But there is another very important lesson — that bigotry often can regrow (as it seems to be doing
in France against Jews), and we need constant vigilance. The issue is raised in the SHU announcement:
“While the film’s title refers to Sister Rose’s intense focus upon her life’s work, it also p
rovides a timely foil to Mel Gibson’s major motion picture, The Passion of the Christ.
A final segment of the documentary shows Sister Rose shaking her head and looking
unhappy while viewing an Internet trailer for Gibson’s film, which some Jews and
Christians have said blames Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus.”
Director Jacoby says that Mel Gibson has not commented on Sister Rose’s story. While Jacoby told
Charlie Rose that Pope John Paul II has been the “best Pope yet” with regards to the Catholic Church’s
relationship with Israel and the Jews, it is clear that many conservative Catholics see the 1965 Vatican II
Council as the root of much of what went wrong in the Catholic Church over the past few decades and
have been trying to undo its reforms. I’d be very interested in hearing from my “experts” Steve Bainbridge
and Martin Grace on whether the teachings about the Jewish people that are enshrined in Nostra Aetate
are controversial. Meanwhile, I give thanks for Sister’s Rose’s passion and achievements. (Check out
her Endowment for Jewish Studies at Seton Hall.)
traffic jam
my small son asks
who made God
clay on the wheel I confess my faith
chasing butterflies . . .
the girl with Wednesday’s ashes
on her brow
from To Hear the Rain (Brooks Books, 2002)
February 14, 2005
fasten your seatbelt, dear
Valentine’s Day
she reminds me
to fasten my seatbelt
you squeeze my hand . . .
how still the sky
after fireworks
[Click here for original photo-poem]
“you squeeze my had” from Open WIndow – haiku & photographs
from a glimpse of red: The Red Moon Anthology 2000
by dagosan:
give her a hand —
a perfect
snow angel
[Feb.14, 2005]
So misunderstood. They’re ganging up on me at Carolyn’s place
on lawyers, fees, fidicuaries — over the valentine-divorce lawyer — and I haven’t
had a chance to reply yet on the merits. It does not help the Carolyn incorrectly
asserts that I believe $375 is excessive for an uncontested divorce.
update (7 PM, Feb. 14, 2005): I finally made a fuller reply at My Shingle.
Part of the discussion can be found here, where Eugene Lee and I go back
and forth on lawyer-fiduciares and the obligation to disclose options.
They’re ganging up on Mike the Idealist Cernovich, at Evan’s place,
where he asks “what do you like best about being a lawyer?”
Prof. B offers an economic rationale for “compassionate conservatism,”
but wonders what happend to smaller government from Repulblicans. Steve has
clearly been reading Bert Foer’s essay on Social Security and markets.
better than a box of chocolates
For the first time, one person — Lenard D. Moore — has won the three major Valentine The Readers and Editors chose this beautiful , sad monument Lenard D. Moore cloudless sky – Carolyn Hall – Tom Painting Gary Hotham — Pamela Miller Ness last of the sunlight “THNLogo” After the burial — — Tom Painting If you came to this website inadvertently, looking for cherry cordial sales or recipes, we apologize. The AOL search engine keeps returning our dui cherry cordials defense story as its #1 result for #6 at Google. Please consider giving your beloved a haiku bouquet, instead.
The annual Valentine Awards issue of The Heron’s Nest is now online for
your pleasure and inspiration. It contains haiku chosen by the Editors and
by the Readers as the best to appear in 2004 in The Heron’s Nest, with
commentaries on many of the selections.
Awards: Readers’ Favorite Poet & Favorite Poem, and Editor’s’ Choice Favorite Poem.
to a father’s love as the best poem of the year:
hot afternoon
the squeak of my hands
on my daughter’s coffin
While you’re waiting for the that special card from that special person to arrive,
The Heron’s Nest Valentine Awards (Vol. VII, Feb 2005) are the perfect distraction —
tastey and tasteful (and non-fattening).
In addition to the major awards, you’ll find excellent runners-up choices, and
a bonus Special Mentions section • (Part I) • (Part II). Ten of the
Special Mention haiku were written by Honored Guests here at f/k/a:
the baaing
of penned sheep
graveside
my father and I
find common ground
near dark —
the grand hotel drips
long after the rain
midsummer sun
facing the mountain
I’ll never climb
all its leaves fallen —
a tree we were
forbidden to climb
— paul m.
no wind today —
the cottonwoods
speak in chickadee
— Billie Wilson
Flooded plain —
fence tops show which water
belongs to whom
— George Swede
cows bounding
downhill
— Carolyn Hall
my eyes on the shadows
of everything
— George Swede
dry heat
a hawk corkscrews
the sky
dagosan: is just going to set back, and take it all in —
after spending a few more minutes over at the Nest.
mailbox stuffed
— Valentines
from relatives
[Feb. 14, 2004 & 2005]
February 13, 2005
off-peak romance
.. .. Emma Forrest makes a very good point: “Love is so delicate, you can’t afford to risk it on fake holiday.” (AP/ Nashua Telegraph, “British author had no need for Valentine’s Day rubbish,” Feb. 20, 2005; also pub. at CNN.com as “I don’t like Valentine’s Day,” Feb. 11, 2005)
The author of “Cherries in the Snow” [nice haiku image] may be in a minority among members of her gender, but I know she finds lots of support in mine. The romantic gestures that really count aren’t those coerced through commercially-motivated promotions. It’s the everyday demonstration of attention, appreciation and respect that has real meaning (sort of like haiku).
Of course, I wouldn’t risk disappointing the object of my affection (nor risk bodily harm), by totally ignoring Valentine’s Day.
George Swede‘s quiet moments of romance are more my style.
at the height
of the argument the old couple
pour each other tea
almost unseen
among the tangled driftwood
naked lovers
on the face
that last night called me names
morning sunbeam
sunrise
I forget my side
of the argument…………………… by George Swede from Almost Unseen: Selected Haiku of George Swede
sealed —
the Valentine card
she never sent
………………………………. by dagosan
A hat-tip to New York Chief Judge, Judith Kaye, for endorsing the concept of no-fault divorce in her State of the Judiciary address this week. Similar kudos to the NYC Bar for its persistence on this issue, and to the State’s Women’s Bar Association, which has finally given up it opposition to no-fault divorce. Some women’s rights groups and domestic violence
advocates, such as the NOW-NYS chapter, continue to oppose no-fault, apparently believing that the current system gives the wife more leverage over her spouse. (NYT article, Feb. 8, 2005; The Journal [Westchester] editorial; NY Daily News article, “Dying man denied divorce,” Feb. 13,
2005 )
[Ed. Note] New York State does not have “no-fault” divorce — one party must assign blame to the other or they must both agree to a Separation Agreement, and then abide by it for one year, before either can sue for a “conversion” divorce. The spouse who doesn’t want the divorce — or merely wants it less– can use the process to extract concessions from the initiating spouse that would not otherwise be available. Many lawyers help turn the process of creating a Separation Agreement between the spouses into a long, antagonizing and very expensive experience. Couples who want a quicker resolution, must often cook up phony evidence of fault (adultery, cruel treatment, etc.), a process that is far from edifying.
A Newsday article (Feb. 13, 2005) gives a good wrap-up of the issues and the players.
The article quotes Kaye:
“After long and careful reflection, I have come to see that requiring strict ‘fault’ grounds may well simply intensify the bitterness between the parties, wasting resources, hurting children, driving residents to other states for a divorce andd elaying the inevitable dissolution of the marriage.”
Kaye also told the Legislature that revision of the Domestic Relations Law should “scrupulously safeguard the interests of the most vulnerable litigants — especially the already disadvantaged poor and victims of domestic violence — while providing needed relief from the fault requirement.”
Frankly, there still are many lawyers who oppose no-fault because they fear a loss of income. However, the principled stance of major bar groups across the state will hopefully help to make statements like the following in Newsday passe: “it might seem counterintuitive for lawyers to want to streamline a process that makes them money.”
Seven national library associations and the American Antitrust Institute sponsored an invitational symposium at Georgetown Law Center on Feb. 11, titled “Antitrust Issues in Scholarly and Legal Publishing.” The link will take you to a paper presented by AAI’s president, Bert Foer, and further information about the symposium.
Does any one know whether the NYS Bar House of Delegates acted on the proposed new definition of pro bono service that we panned here, when the met at the end of January?
A little pet peeving, brought on by the CNN.com article linked above, plus frequent visits to one of my favorite weblogs: Could people please stop using the phrase “eclectic mix.” “Mix” will do just fine; we don’t need to be told your selection is also “eclectic.”. Nobody thinks the variety found in your reading list, record collection, or weblog content is totally random. And, the 416,000 results for the Google search eclectic mix”> confirms my suspicion that the phrase is over-used. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest. Even haikuEsq gets grumpy.