You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

February 20, 2005

it’s just a bear, paw

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 12:10 am

As Dave Bear-y might say: “I’m not making this up.”   For the past two days,

a big story around these parts has been the discovery of a severed hand in the

frontyard of a suburban home near Albany, NY. (“Big Story: Dismembered hand

found in Guilderland,” WTEN.com, Feb. 18, 2005)  The remains, which

appeared to be a “man’s hand,” were found in a surgical glove, covered in

blood, with the finger tips removed; a Christmas ribbon was nearby.

 

“snowFlakesN”  A helicopter, a backhoe, and dogs helped a squad of cops search the

area for hours,  seeking the rest of the body.  Pathologists at Albany Medical Center

decided to x-ray the human hand today, when they discovered that it was not human

(“Discovered remains not human,”  CapitalNew9, Feb. 19, 2005; film clip, too)   Instead,

it is the claw of an animal made to look human.  The current working hypothesis is that

the claw used to belong to a bear.  Get more details here.  Stay tuned.




  • Next time I tell you all the news around here is weird or embarrassing,

    I hope you’ll believe me. 

 







bearS


boars and bears
are my neighbors…
winter seclusion




red-bearded grandpa’s
grafted branch…
his hand still steady

 

 

ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

 

phone old  Meanwhile, over here on the “wrong” side of the high-

tech tracks, we’re still wonderin’ why Evan, Jeremy, Mike, Denise,

Larry, Ernie, Kevin, Bob, and all the other gadget pioneers are making such

a fuss over PodCasts.  I’m sure glad I’m not an employer or supervisor

having to keep all the kiddies on task while on the job.  Too many distractions

in this world of ours, says haikuEsq, and Prof. Yabut concurs (along with

Ann Althouse, it appears).

 

tiny check  The f/k/a gang is pleased to say that we picked up one of those new-fangled

telephone contraptions and had our first transcontinental communication with Pasadena

today.  George M. Wallace really exists — and he’s got a landline in the Forest.  Too cool.







by dagosan:  

 

digital age:

aging digits

at the keyboard

 

 

February 19, 2005

help abolish lawyer tyranny

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 9:41 pm

sat. pm potluck

 

1] Sorry, Mom, I can’t help ya:  Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of the Virginia Bar’s

ULP Opinion 207 (Feb. 18, 2004), which concluded that a lawyer-trained social worker

would be guilty of the unlawful practice of law by assisting pro se litigants in the preparation,

or even the selection, of forms for Small Claims Court.  Virginia’s Bar Council met today (Feb.

19) in Richmond to consider approving, disapproving or modifying the opinion.  


topHatAbe The legal reform group HALT (f/k/a Help Abolish Legal Tyranny) submitted

comments to the Virginia State Bar on Feb. 17, 2005, pointing out that Virginia’s

Small Claims courts require the use of unusually difficult forms and, “The vast majority

of Virginia small claims litigants are unable to complete court forms unassisted.  If the

Virginia Small Claims Division is to serve any meaningful function as an accessible

arbiter of justice, litigants must be allowed to use the assistance of nonlawyers.”  HALT

has a small claims reform project that is fighting for the use of plain-English forms and

in-person assistance to consumers at the courts.

2] HALT‘s Feb. 16, 2005 newsletter suggests that bar groups are continuing to act like

guilds — putting their interests before clients’ interests and rights — while courts have

been at the forefront of assisting pro se litigants and the self-help legal movement.  Examples:



  • The Georgia State Bar may adopt a proposal preventing nonlawyers from

    drafting articles of incorporation.



  • The Montana State Bar Association is “gagging” consumers from speaking

    publicly about their complaints against lawyers. A consumer will face punishment

    if she decides to disclose to anyone, including family membersand friends, that she

    has filed a complaint.




  • In January 2005, the Wisconsin Board of Governors rejected the new ABA Ethics

    2000 rule requiring written fee agreements. 

 

On the other hand, thank you, Your Honor:



  • Throughout 2005, one of Hawaii’s family courts will hold monthly sessions of

    “Divorce Law in Hawaii,” a free session for the public offering an overview on

    the process and tips on finding self-help resources.



  • Wisconsinites going through a divorce will have a new resource starting in spring

    2005. The court system is putting the finishing touches on a project to create a set

    of standardized pro se divorce forms that can be used throughout the state. These

    forms will be available in courthouses and on the state’s Web site.

                                                                                                                                                        puppySam  

                                                                                                                                                          Sam B., click for original

 

3]  Now I understand:  It appears that both Prof. Steven Bainbridge and his then-puppy, Sam,

were exposed to significant amounts of Purple Snow a number of years ago.   Given the well-

known effects of purple rain and purple haze on other celebrities, the weblawgger a/k/a Prof. B.

can perhaps be excused for actin’ funny and asking “is it tomorrow or just the end of time?”


penny sm It does not appear that Steve is yet affiliated with this, this, or that product

penny sm  Speaking of the scent of money, given the extraordinary canine sense of  penny sm

smell [50 to 100 times better than that of humans, per this source, and “thousands of times”

better, per this report], I wonder which wines are Sam’s favorites — and whether Sam is a 

partner over at this weblog.  I bet he works for scrapsunder the table.

 

 


 
scattering onto
my purple sleeves…
spring snow

 






on purple clouds
when will I set sail?
western sea

 

ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

 

NODD Declare Victory, and then Do It Again:  I got an email today from the Not One Damn Dime folks.

Despite our skepticism over slacktivism, the NODDites claim their spending-boycott on Inauguration Day

was a huge success.”  And, on April 15th they’re gonna do nothing again — this time for the cause of

“responsible spending.”   I like the cause.  However, the now-revealed initiator of NODD, communications

professional and political junkie, Pete Smith of Minnesota, does not seem to be in touch with political

reality.  (Pete and Daily Kos’ Rabid Nation might have to take a paternity test to settle just who is the

progenitor of NODD.)



 

                                                                                                                 penny sm

faint first star

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:51 pm

Such a pleasant Saturday.  Before heading out to a sunny winter day, I just

“strolled” my favorite haiku garden and found one of my favorite haiku poets.

 

As a result, here are three poems from The Heron’s Nest by George Swede:  “thnLogoF” 

 

 

ebb tide
the sand castle moat
still showing clouds

 

 

 

 


old tombstone
losing its name
faint first star

 








by the statue
of the polar explorer
lingering snow

 

George Swede from The Heron’s Nest – a haikai journal







 



by dagosan:  





 


cirrus clouds and

a dusting of snow —

the midday moon is shedding


 

                                                 [Feb. 19, 2005]

 

snowFlakeSN  potluck

 

“tinyredcheck”   Frankly, my morning was not all pleasant.   I spent time at MyShingle

“discussing” reasonable contingency fees with Eugene, at a post that had

been about needing to have retainer agreements. (I don’t start these fights.

I just point out the logical responsibilities that go with professional & fiduciary

duties, and the primacy of the client’s, not the lawyer’s interests.)  

 

tiny check  Mike “Fedster” Cernovich never stops making work for me.  Please

go to C&F and answer his question:  Is a public defender system better for

indigent clients than having assigned counsel?  Or as Mike puts it:  “Is Mr.

Giacalone right?” that PDs are better.

 

tiny check  Thanks to Bob Ambrogi and Kevin Heller for pointing to Evan D.

Brown’s new Internet Cases weblog — a topic of interest to many of us.

 













GWg

February 18, 2005

with ice-floes jammin’ down the block

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:36 am








 

                                             last night’s snow down river     






 

 

 

snow now rain–

your picture

by mine

 

 

 

 

green light

from a green bottle

winter morning

 

 


 

 



by dagosan:  





 

pink clouds

in the crotch of the bare oak 

the street-walker stares

 

                                                 [Feb. 18, 2005]

 

potluck

 

“tinyredcheck”  If you’re interested in the fairness of our criminal justice system, you need to read the recently

posted “Gideon’s Broken Promise: America’s Contnuing Quest for Equal Justice” (ABA Standing Committee

on Legal Aid and Indigent Defendants, 2004) (pointer from Legaline).  I agree with each of its major Findings:

 


#1 Forty years after Gideon v. Wainwright, indigent defense in the United States remains

in a state of crisis, resulting in a system that lacks fundamental fairness and places poor

persons at constant risk of wrongful conviction.

 

#2  Funding for indigent defense services is shamefully inadequate. The lack of funding impacts

on virtually every aspect of indigent defense systems.

 

#3  In addition to providing constitutionally adequate representation, lawyers who defend the

indigent also are required to provide representation that is “competent,” as required by rules

of professional conduct. . . . Yet, defense lawyers for the indigent sometimes are unable to or

do not comply with this and other requirements, and as a nation we tolerate substandard

representation in indigent defense that is not acceptable practice on behalf of paying clients.

However, ethical violations routinely are ignored not only by the lawyers themselves, but also

by judges and disciplinary authorities.

I also agree that indigent defendants are far more likely to receive consistently competent representation

in a system with fulltime public defenders (with statewide monitoring and funding) than from situations

that rely heavily on assigned counsel. (see prior post)




  • what does it mean that one-third of Massachussetts legislators are

    lawyers, but Massachusetts Bar Advocates went 25 years without a pay raise?

“tinyquestionN”   Norm Pattis is looking for suggestions on how law school or CLE could better help lawyers to

deal with the irrational and unhealthy demands and desires of clients (and of law firms).  Stop over to Crime

& Federalism and give Norm a little counseling.  [I suggested that we can learn a lot from the training given

to social workers in jobs such as Child Protective Services, and who deal daily with highly agitated, angry people, and yet remain unflappable but caring.]

 

tiny check  Todd Zywicki at Volokh Conspiracy frets over George Mason Univ. being the “other, other George” among

the three D.C. Area colleges, pointing to ESPN coverage.  When I was a college student in the late ’60’s, going

to Georgetown, there was only one other George in town.  Of course, there is no confusing George Washington

and Georgetown with GMU in the great Ideology Games played out daily here in weblog world and Washington. 

 

tiny check  Bob Ambrogi points to two weblogs with what he calls “stunning design,” saying they show 

“how creative design can help strengthen the impact of a blog.”  I looked at Symtym and Patent Baristas, and I

don’t get it.   For me, large graphics in a masthead or sidebar add absolutely nothing positive to my opinion of

a weblog or the chance I will return to it.  And, dark backgrounds (especially with patterns) detract considerably

from the reading experience.  Lisa Stone wonders if you care:  pared-down or gussied up?


update (7 PM): Thanks to Tara’s pointer at ResearchBuzz, I updated my Google Toolbar

yesterday.  I’ve been playing with its new “WordTranslator: hover your cursor over a word

and the WordTranslator feature will display the word in French, Italian, German, Spanish,

Chinese (simplified and traditional), Japanese, or Korean.”  However, my Windows XP Pro

has completely shut itself down three times, after running very slowly, without asking my

permission, today.  Has  anyone else had a similar problem?  Tara?

February 17, 2005

dandelion ghosts

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 2:32 pm



no wind today —
the cottonwoods
speak in chickadee



 

 






long winter–

prayer bundles sway

in the cedars

 

 

 

 


breezy afternoon–
dandelion ghosts
float past the daisies

 

 

“snowflakeSN”  Billie Wilson from The Heron’s Nest – a haikai journal

no wind today” (special mention, Valentine’s Issues, Feb. 2005)


 

 



by dagosan:  






travel plans

penciled in —

winter’s asterisk *

 



  I just learned today that Sen. Barack Obama was among the 18 Democrats voting 

for the Class Action Reform Act last week.  All 26 opposing senators were Democrats.

Obama appears to have adopted the popular (with me too) anti-coupon position, but

maybe also the Madison County-bashing. According to the Kansas City Star (Feb. 10, 2005):


Barack Obama, D-Ill., said in a statement afterward that he had voted for the

bill even though he is “a strong believer” in class-action lawsuits.”When multimillion-

dollar settlements are handed down and all the victims get are coupons for a free

product, justice is not being served,” he said. “And when cases are tried in counties

only because it’s known that those judges will award big payoffs, you get quick

settlements without ever finding out who’s right and who’s wrong.”

Of course, f/k/a is still waiting for a fuller explanation of Obama’s Tort Reform position.

tiny check I can’t understand why it would be shocking to learn that some companies are firing

employees for things they have posted at their weblogs concerning the company.  (See CNN/Money

 article)  Would we be shocked that an employee was canned for putting nasty remarks about a

supervisor, or proprietary information, on a roadside billboard?  If the electronic communication

device in question were a telephone, wouldn’t you want to know the facts before getting huffy? 

People get so myopic when they think their ox is being gored.

 

graph up gray A year ago this week, we talked about misleading “hit” counts on weblogs (see herehere).

I finally got a Site Meter two weeks ago and have compared the Daily Hits numbers from my 

Harvard weblog server over a 24-hour period with the Site Meter results.  On one

representative day, I found that Site Meter Page Hits were 5.9% of the Harvard Hits, and 

on another they were 4.7% of the Harvard Hits.  

 

tiny check   Where do they get these slogans?  New York City wants to trademark a new    

tourism slogan “The World’s Second Home” — which is only going to remind folks of

the line about it being a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there.    In general, I

think telling people your self-proclaimed status is not very effective.  If they want the home

theme, why not “New York City — Make Yourself at Home” or “We’ll Make You Feel at

Home”?  On the other hand, who travels to feel at home?

 

tiny check All kidding aside, for a moment, Steve Bainbridge has some very good questions  fedupski

for his fellow conservatives on private Social Security accounts.  Check his TrackBacks and

decide whether their answers are persuasive.

 

“tinyredcheck”  Speaking of weblog persuasion, Lisa Stone at Legal Blog Watch quotes a couple

Law.com luminaries who seem riled by the MSM-weblog-what’s-journalism? debate.   Prof. Eugune

Volokh thinks the analogy of webloggers to lynch mobs is very weak.  And J. Craig Williams wonders 

After all, if you have a legal question, who would you rather hearthe answer from? A newspaper

reporter who asked a lawyer? Or from a lawyer who’s also a highly respected law professor?”  While

I agree that some weblogs are journalism (but many don’t even try to be), I also believe that:


(1) Webloggers have the ability to create giant “opinion bubbles” that are based on weak or

misunderstood facts, yet have persuasive or coercive force that is totally unconnected to reason,

logic, virtue, or facts.   The “lynch mob” effect is fueled very often by such anger and vile — and

ideologically-based agendas — that the target can be easily overwhelmed and left without allies.

(e.g., the Durango Cookie Case, where the girls were flooded with gifts and tv invitations and

Mrs.Young ended up flooded with hate mail and phone calls, and death threats, before she had

any chance to get her facts out.)

 

(2) I know of no source more likely to give a skewed response on an issue than a law professor

who’s already stated an opinion publically on the issue in question.   There are some legal

journalistswho do a darn good job at figuring out the law without asking a lawyer or a law

professor.

 

(3) Too many folks with weblogs have a hard time understanding that their opinion is not

necessarily truth and comes filtered through their own ideological and experiential perspectives.

 

I know this last blurb violates yesterday’s pledge to keep things short, but Lisa made me do it.  noYabutsS

what Prof. B won’t do

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 12:05 pm

 


 

“tinyredcheck”  Steve Bainbridge has assured his readership that — tip jars and cable-organizer ads

aside — he would not auction off space on his pregnant tummy just to make a few

bucks.   (I don’t make these things up.) 

 

In the law (and religion) biz, we call that turning necessity into virtue.  With Gov. Arnold ArnoldJunior

being sort of busy, I wonder how Steve would feel about tummy ads, if he were to star

in the sequel to “Junior.”  Hmmmm.

 

pokerDogsN  It seems that Prof. B won’t be buying any Dogs Playing Poker original

paintings, either.   On aesthetics grounds, on with him — although the old posters have

always made me smile.   Of course, the buyer of the two paintings from the series this

week, for $590,4000, might be counting on this being a smart investment. 




  • “I was intrigued to learn that the artist, C. M. Coolidge is “credited with

    creating the life-size Boardwalk cutouts into which one’s head is placed,

    allowing the person to be photographed as a character or animal.

     

    “Coolidge was also a banker, shopkeeper, inventor and painter. He even

    penned an opera.” (CNN.com article)




  • You’ll probably only get $10 for your old Poker Dogs poster.

 





tripping over the dog
again…
night of winter rain



                 ISSA, translated by D.G.Lanoue






 

 

A gray dawn —

last night’s poker cards

facedown on the table

                                         Rebecca Lilly, from A New Resonance 2 

                                                            & Modern Haiku XXX:3

 

 



pokerDogs

February 16, 2005

dagosan’s scrapbook — Feb. 2005

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 11:35 pm

crows neg flip


– below are haiku and senryu written by “dagosan“, this weblog’s Editor, David A. Giacalone. most have been on the Home Page, some are outtakes and rewrites. each is a work in progress. i hope they show improvement over time and encourage others to try writing haiku –


 – click here for dagosan’s archive





 

 

a three-engine freight train

delays lunch —

two stomachs rumble

 

                           [Feb. 28, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



offering a kiss —

she eagerly shares

calories

                       [Feb. 27, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


a huge yellow moon —

our argument fogs

the windshield 

 

                               

          



 

we all help

blow out the candles —

dad’s 86th birthday



 

                     [Feb. 26, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 


a dear aunt’s cluttered desk —

checking email

from her guest room

 

                                          [Feb. 25, 2005]

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pleasantly surprised

again —

full moon at the window

 

                                    [Feb. 24, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





middle finger

papercut

middle finger

 

 

 

 






afraid to look

under the bed —

dust dinosaurs sleep

[Feb. 23, 2005] 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


bookstore
history section —

two honest presidents

                                                 [Feb. 21, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 


the visiting twin

driving alone

into a snow storm

                              [Feb. 21, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


business lunch

starts with a compliment —

he raises his knife

                                             [Feb. 20, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


digital age:

aging digits

at the keyboard

 

                      [re-do]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 


cirrus clouds and

a dusting of snow —

the midday moon is shedding


 

                                                 [Feb. 19, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

pink clouds

in the bare oak’s crotch

the street-walker stares

 

                                                 [Feb. 18, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

travel plans

penciled in*

*winter’s asterisk

 

                                       [Feb. 17, 2005]

 

 

 









dust on the spine

of each cookbook —

soup can in the sink

                               [Feb. 16, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 



where two boys

ice-fished yesterday —

two ducks swim

                                 [Feb.15, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


valentine for

an apostate son —

novena card from mom

                                           [Feb. 15, 2005]           

 

 

 

 

 

 



give her a hand —

a perfect

snow angel

                                 [Feb.14, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mailbox stuffed
— Valentines
from relatives
                            [Feb. 14, 2004 & 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


sealed —

the Valentine card

she never sent

                              [Feb. 13, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 









honest Abe  —

no one wears his hat

or fills his shoes

                                 [Feb. 12, 2005]

 




 

 


warmed by the sun

lit by the moon —

icy porch steps 

                               [Feb.11, 2005]

 

 

 

 


valentine sun

warms the kitchen —

tuna melt for lunch

                                       [Feb.10, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


wondering where

they go in winter —

pond frogs and children

                                       [Feb.9, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


can’t reach

the triple-word score —

the dog whines for table scraps

                                          [Feb.9, 2005]

 



 

 

 

 







sad chirp of 

the smoke detector —

another low battery

                              [Feb.8, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



today

the sun sets too slowly —

driving westward

                                       [Feb.7, 2005]

 

 

 



at the sink

squinting at sunrise

and saturday’s dishes

                                     [Feb.6, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



sunset tints

the cloudbank pink —

avoiding yellow snow

                                   [Feb.5, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



can’t take my eyes off

the bird in flight —

wanting to know its name

 

                                  [Feb.4, 2005]

 

 

 

 

 

 


four Advil

at a time —

caressing the cordless mouse

                                                          [Feb. 3, 2005]




 

 

 

 


window view

icicle and branch —

branch



                           [Feb. 2, 2005]






 

 

 


in the freezer, 

three starter snowmen —

cloudless sky

                                   [Feb. 1, 2005]

the dust settles

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:31 pm

through the open door . . .

her smile doesn’t forgive

all my sins

 





 

the daughter taps flour

into a mixing bowl . . .

mother’s apron tight

 









cedar walking cane

hangs from the coat rack

dust on the handles curves

 


“schoolBrooks” Randy Brooks, from School’s Out (Press Here, 1999)  

 

 


 


by dagosan:  





dust on the spine

of each cookbook —

soup can in the sink

                               [Feb. 16, 2005]

 

 



“tinyredcheck”  Issue-spotting 101: It seems that some of the greatest professorial minds

in the weblawg world never thought about Weblog Tips as possibly being income. 

TaxProffer Paul Caron sets ’em straight.  Where did you land on the test curve?

 

tiny check  Ealier today, I noticed that there were 32 hits on my Referer List for the Google coffee cup gray


Foods to Eat While Driving.  Speaking of issue spotting, try to guess them and their order

before clicking for the article from Insurance.com.   (okay, a hint: Coffee is #1, Chocolate #10.)


tiny check I agree with Carolyn Elefant that writing about the ethical lapses of others can be

humbling.  She asks today whether lawyers who end up swamped with discipline violations

were salvageable or are inherently bad.  Both kinds exist, I am sure.

 

“tinyquestion”  Have you noticed how many USA-born webloggers spell the word “gray” with an

“e” [“grey”]?  I even caught myself about to do it last week.  Affectations-R-Us.  The

Fool in the Forest would at least have the excuse of hanging around a lot of British poets.  Not so

him, him, or him.  Of course, some of us naturally straddle the fence.

 

tiny check  Personally, I’m not as fond of the adjective “outrageous” as some webloggers seem to

be.   Before hurling verbal grenades or nukes (as opposed to raising a red flag or shooting a warning

shot in the air), it makes sense to consider the source of the story and go to some level-headed and

original sources.  Sometimes you’ll find the extremists were right, but creating unwarranted cynicism

doesn’t seem to be a helpful goal.

 

“tinyquestionN”  Ever wonder What Do Exit Polls and Flu Vaccine Shortages Have in Common?
An essay by Bert Foer, Bob Lande, and Mike Scherer, of the American Antitrust Institute offers an

answer. (Hint: it’s not just bad luck; think: excessive concentration, too few alternative sources).

 

“tinyredcheck”  The saddest thing about Charlie Rose‘s interview last night with the Godfathers of

Blog was their agreement that they all get enormous amounts of intensely angry and ugly messages.

Second worse thing: they all forgot to add the “we” back to “blog.”

potluck light

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:12 pm

Another round of hyper-punditry and commentary (here and elsewhere) has once

again left me exhausted and wondering whether I’ll ever learn the lessons my body

keeps trying to teach me.   With my renewed discipline, I shall spare you the details

(but see precursor post), and point to the new tag line in my masthead.  I’ve replaced

“punditry” with “potluck” — which Martin would surely have termed pot au feu.  I

hope the change reminds me to take myself less seriously, and to keep haiku

in the spotlight and center-stage. 

 

noYabutsSN  From now on, in addition to a haiku entree, look for very brief pointers

to things elsewhere on the Web that interest me.  Expect many of the same topics

that have obsessed ethicalEsq, Prof. Yabut and Jack Cliente.   This won’t be an all-

you-can-eat buffet.  Call it potluck novelle — tastier, healthier, and less fattening.

 

 


three meals a day
this trip, living large!
winter storm clouds

 







flitting butterfly–
after supper, a temple
pilgrimage

 

 

coming to lunch
on the sleeping man…
mosquito

 







ooh

 

the farmer’s lunch
dangles…
on the scarecrow



February 15, 2005

sorry, pardner . . .

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:59 pm

tiny check . . . but, maybe we’re not both covered.  The fight over Medicare covering “lifestyle drugs”

(A/P, Feb. 2. 2005) is quite complicated.  See “Lifestyle drugs: Issues for Debate,” by Joel

Lexchin, M.D., CMAJ, May 16, 2001).  Whether private insureds or taxpayers should help

oldtimers and Baby Boomers to extend their youth, by underwriting treatments for “ailments”

like male pattern baldness or erectile dysfunction is a very big financial and social issue. 

Dr. Lexchin broaches many of the issues in his CMAJ article and states:


“If we as a society decide that lifestyle drugs should be covered through the  aspirin

health care system, then other treatments may not get funded or at least will

not get as much funding as they otherwise would have. Decisions will also be

needed about who will get the drugs (since almost everyone will want one or

more of them) and whether they will be available in unlimited supply.

 

“. . . We need to find mechanisms whereby all elements of society — government,

industry, health care professionals, patients and consumers — can participate in

the decisions.”

aspirin f  On Feb. 13, as the Sunday talking heads wrung their hands over this, and conservative

Republicans said they must “revisit” the Medicare drug coverage of lifestyle drugs (despite a

Presidential veto threat for any attempts to decrease coverage),  I could not help but note —

speaking of lifestyle choices — that by next Valentine’s Day Medicare could be paying for two

[or more?] Cialis prescriptions for the aging partners in one household.  Can you say “unintended

consequences,” Mr. President? (or extended side effects?)




  • Perhaps, you’ll have to have a Designated Consort or a Marriage

    License to get ED drugs.




  • Maybe Evan Schaeffer, the web’s favorite ED-J.D. and our Cialis

    Counselor-in-Chief, has a solution.



tiny check . . . but, maybe this weblog income ain’t worth the trouble.  Prof.

Bainbridge explains, in detail and persuasively, why group weblogs that bring

in income are probably partnerships under Section 202(a) of the Uniform

Partnership Act (1997).  Seems to me, that if the basic tackiness of using ads

and begging-jars on your site is not enough to stop such practices, the

added aggravation of partnership issues for group weblogs should tip the

balance toward keeping them lucre-free.  If you still won’t give up group 

advertising and mendicity, Prof. B has a book for you, of course.   I’m willing

to bet that Steve will stay solo in the blogiverse.


tiny check . . . but, I gotta rat on ya.  In its February edition, the ABA Journal  lawyer cellphone small

reports on a new ABA ethics opinion [Formal Opinion 04-433 (2004)] under

Model Rule 8.3.  Here’s the synopsis:


Obligation of a Lawyer to Report Professional Misconduct by

a Lawyer Not Engaged in the Practice of Law

A lawyer having knowledge of the professional misconduct of

another licensed lawyer, including a non-practicing lawyer, is

obligated under Model Rule 8.3 to report such misconduct if it

raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trust-

worthiness, or fitness as a lawyer. The professional misconduct

 must be reported even if it involves activity completely removed

from the practice of law. If the report would require revealing the

confidential information of a client, the lawyer must obtain the

client’s informed consent before making the report.

The f/k/a gang agrees.  Having asserted that lawyers “need to remember

that ethics rules apply even when it takes courage to comply,” we applaud

the Ethics Committee.  The Journal article concludes as follows:


The ethics committee acknowledges in its opinion that reporting

a colleague’s misconduct, particularly if that lawyer is a supervisor,

can be awkward and uncomfortable, and it even may put the reporting

lawyer’s career in jeopardy. But, the committee emphasizes, “Because

the legal profession enjoys the privilege of regulating itself, it is

critically important that its members fulfill their responsibility to stand

guard over the profession’s integrity and high standards.”

On the other hand, lots of very good ABA Formal Ethics Opinions are consistenly

ignored by bar Counsel and lawyers across the land.

 

 

“tinyredcheck”  . . . but, I won that Valentine’s Day divorce.   

Someone named Heidi won the WKRL-FM contest, and the overvalued legal services of  handcuffs

Brad S. Margolis.   I sent an email to attorney Margolis and the radio station on Sunday,

asking whether I got the facts straight in my post the valentine-divorce lawyer.   Neither

has responded.  Our expose didn’t even make it into the list compiled by the station under

the heading “Not EVERYONE Liked the Idea of That Damn Morning Show giving away a

divorce”  We didn’t garner any media attention either (but got some agita at Carolyn’s place). 

However, I’m pleased to say that the posting is the #3 result at Google for the search inquiry

 

 



update II (Feb. 16, midnite): Lawyer Brad S. Margolis contacted me twice this

vening. In his first email, he noted “I am not getting anything for this promotion, 

In fact I am even paying 100 percent of the filing fees out of my own pocket.” 

On the issue of his flat fee for uncontested divorces, Margolis stated:


“Yes my online fees are less than my in office fees, that is to make legal

fees affordable to people who are lucky to have money for food. . . .

 

“As and for what the cost of an uncontested Divorce is I believe that

the figure quoted is not incorrect and online prices which you should

know are far less than in office cases.  Just a matter of common sense,

which apparently you lacked in your biased appraisal of my actions.

When I responded with more questions, he wrote back and clarified that “in

many cases I do charge that fee for an uncontested divorce.  [Y]es I do discount

my web services as I find the overhead of the web office much lower than the

high priced rent I must factor in to some of my offices.” 

 

I wrote back to say I can’t imagine how the cost of clients attracted online can

be so significantly lower as to warrant the difference between $1000 and $375. 

I also noted that I continue to believe that $1000 is too much for what Margolis

himself called the “paper-pushing” of an uncontested divorce.   Readers will

have to decide for themselves whether “The approximate retail value of

Uncontested Divorce is $1,000.00.” 

 

 


the tea smoke
and the willow
dance partners
                        

ISSA, translated by David G. Lanoue

 

 





 
by dagosan:  



where two boys

ice-fished yesterday —

two ducks swim

                                 [Feb.15, 2005]

Sister Rose’s Faith

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:19 pm

Whether or not it wins an Oscar for best short documentary this month, and before I’ve even

seen it, I want to declare the film “Sister Rose’s Passion” a rousing success — because it is the

proximate cause of my learning the story of Sister Rose Thering.  Charlie Rose’s [no relation]

interview with film producer/director Oren Jacoby last night (Feb. 14, 2005) filled me with awe

and gratitude for a spunky woman who almost single-handedly made the Catholic Church

reconsider and change its policy toward the Jewish people. 

 

As a girl in Wisconsin, Rose Thering could not understand how a just and loving God   sisterRose 

could condemn an entire race for the death of Jesus — even two millennia later.  Her interest resulted

in doctoral research which “played a significant role in the 1965 Vatican document Nostra Aetate

(Our Time), which formally declared that Jews were not responsible for the death of Jesus.”

(Seton Hall Univ. News, Sister Rose’s Passion nominated for Academy Award,” by Catherine

Memory) 

 

There are many lessons to learn from Sister Rose, including: (1) that one person with passion for a

cause can make a very big  difference, even starting from the bottom of a powerful hierarchy that

would like to silence the dissenting view; and  (2) that knowledge and reason can at times get even an

“infallible” Church, a self-proclaimed final interpreter of God’s Will, to admit a major historic mistake .

 

nunF But there is another very important lesson — that bigotry often can regrow (as it seems to be doing  

in France against Jews), and we need constant vigilance.  The issue is raised in the SHU announcement:


“While the film’s title refers to Sister Rose’s intense focus upon her life’s work, it also p

rovides a timely foil to Mel Gibson’s major motion picture, The Passion of the Christ.

A final segment of the documentary shows Sister Rose shaking her head and looking

unhappy while viewing an Internet trailer for Gibson’s film, which some Jews and

Christians have said blames Jews for the crucifixion of Jesus.”

Director Jacoby says that Mel Gibson has not commented on Sister Rose’s story.  While Jacoby told  torah

Charlie Rose that Pope John Paul II has been the “best Pope yet” with regards to the Catholic Church’s

relationship with Israel and the Jews, it is clear that many conservative Catholics see the 1965 Vatican II

Council as the root of much of what went wrong in the Catholic Church over the past few decades and

have been trying to undo its reforms.  I’d be very interested in hearing from my “experts” Steve Bainbridge

and Martin Grace on whether the teachings about the Jewish people that are enshrined in Nostra Aetate

are controversial.   Meanwhile, I give thanks for Sister’s Rose’s passion and achievements.  (Check out

her Endowment for Jewish Studies at Seton Hall.)

 


 

traffic jam

my small son asks

who made God

 

 

 






clay on the wheel I confess my faith

 

 

 

chasing butterflies . . .

the girl with Wednesday’s ashes

on her brow

 

 

 


from To Hear the Rain (Brooks Books, 2002)

 

 




from dagosan




valentine for

an apostate son —

novena card from mom

                                      [Feb. 15, 2005]                                                          

February 14, 2005

fasten your seatbelt, dear

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:03 pm







Valentine’s Day
she reminds me
to fasten my seatbelt   



 

you squeeze my hand . . .

how still the sky

after fireworks

 

 

Welch fireworks  

[Click here for original photo-poem]

 

 








pickup g  Michael Dylan Welch      pickup g             

“you squeeze my had” from Open WIndow – haiku & photographs

from a glimpse of red: The Red Moon Anthology 2000

 

by dagosan:  



give her a hand —

a perfect

snow angel

                                 [Feb.14, 2005]

 



tiny check  So misunderstood.  They’re ganging up on me at Carolyn’s place

on lawyers, fees, fidicuaries — over the valentine-divorce lawyer — and I haven’t

had a chance to reply yet on the merits.  It does not help the Carolyn incorrectly

asserts that I believe $375 is excessive for an uncontested divorce.



update (7 PM, Feb. 14, 2005):  I finally made a fuller reply at My Shingle.

Part of the discussion can be found here, where Eugene Lee and I go back

and forth on lawyer-fiduciares and the obligation to disclose options.

tiny check They’re ganging up on Mike the Idealist Cernovich, at Evan’s place,

where he asks “what do you like best about being a lawyer?”

 

tiny check  Prof. B offers an economic rationale for “compassionate conservatism,”

but wonders what happend to smaller government from Repulblicans.  Steve has

clearly been reading Bert Foer’s essay on Social Security and markets.

better than a box of chocolates

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:36 am



 
The annual Valentine Awards issue of The Heron’s Nest is now online for  THNlogoG
your pleasure and inspiration.  It contains haiku chosen by the Editors and
by the Readers as the best to appear in 2004 in The Heron’s Nest, with
commentaries on many of the selections. 


For the first time, one person — Lenard D. Moore — has won the three major Valentine
Awards: Readers’ Favorite Poet & Favorite Poem, and Editor’s’ Choice Favorite Poem.


The Readers and Editors chose this beautiful , sad monument
to a father’s love as the best poem of the year:





hot afternoon
the squeak of my hands
on my daughter’s coffin


                       Lenard D. Moore



 THNlogoF While you’re waiting for the that special card from that special person to arrive,
The Heron’s Nest Valentine Awards (Vol. VII, Feb 2005) are the perfect distraction —
tastey and tasteful (and non-fattening).
 
In addition to the major awards, you’ll find excellent runners-up choices, and  
a bonus Special Mentions section •  (Part I) •  (Part II).  Ten of the
Special Mention haiku were written by Honored Guests here at f/k/a:
 




cloudless sky
the baaing
of penned sheep


              –  Carolyn Hall
 
 
 
 
 
graveside
my father and I
find common ground


                 – Tom Painting
 
 





 
near dark —
the grand hotel drips
long after the rain


                          Gary Hotham
 
 
 
 
 
midsummer sun
facing the mountain
I’ll never climb


                     — Pamela Miller Ness


THNlogoF                
 


 
all its leaves fallen —
a tree we were
forbidden to climb
                                        — paul m.
 


 
 
 
no wind today —
the cottonwoods
speak in chickadee
                                     — Billie Wilson
 
 
 
 
 
Flooded plain —
fence tops show which water
belongs to whom
                                 — George Swede
 
 
 








last of the sunlight
cows bounding
downhill
                      — Carolyn Hall
 


“THNLogo”


After the burial —
my eyes on the shadows
of everything
                             — George Swede



 
 
dry heat
a hawk corkscrews
the sky


                 — Tom Painting 



                                                                                      
 
tiny check  dagosan:  is just going to set back, and take it all in —
after spending a few more minutes over at the Nest.




mailbox stuffed
— Valentines
from relatives
                            [Feb. 14, 2004 & 2005]


 


 cherriesSm   If you came to this website inadvertently, looking for cherry cordial sales or recipes, we apologize.  The AOL search engine keeps returning our dui cherry cordials defense story as its #1 result for #6 at Google.  Please consider giving your beloved a haiku bouquet, instead. 
 

February 13, 2005

off-peak romance

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 7:33 pm

.. .. Emma Forrest makes a very good point: “Love is so delicate, you can’t afford to risk it on fake holiday.” (AP/ Nashua Telegraph, British author had no need for Valentine’s Day rubbish,” Feb. 20, 2005; also pub. at CNN.com as “I don’t like Valentine’s Day,” Feb. 11, 2005)

cherriesSnow The author of “Cherries in the Snow” [nice haiku image] may be in a minority among members of her gender, but I know she finds lots of support in mine. The romantic gestures that really count aren’t those coerced through commercially-motivated promotions. It’s the everyday demonstration of attention, appreciation and respect that has real meaning (sort of like haiku).

Of course, I wouldn’t risk disappointing the object of my affection (nor risk bodily harm), by totally ignoring Valentine’s Day.

George Swede‘s quiet moments of romance are more my style.

at the height
of the argument the old couple
pour each other tea

almost unseen
among the tangled driftwood
naked lovers

emmaForrest

on the face
that last night called me names
morning sunbeam

sunrise
I forget my side
of the argument

…………………… by George Swede from Almost Unseen: Selected Haiku of George Swede

sealed —
the Valentine card
she never sent

………………………………. by dagosan

one-breath pundit

hat tip small A hat-tip to New York Chief Judge, Judith Kaye, for endorsing the concept of no-fault divorce in her State of the Judiciary address this week. Similar kudos to the NYC Bar for its persistence on this issue, and to the State’s Women’s Bar Association, which has finally given up it opposition to no-fault divorce. Some women’s rights groups and domestic violence

advocates, such as the NOW-NYS chapter, continue to oppose no-fault, apparently believing that the current system gives the wife more leverage over her spouse. (NYT article, Feb. 8, 2005; The Journal [Westchester] editorial; NY Daily News article, “Dying man denied divorce,” Feb. 13,

2005 )

[Ed. Note] New York State does not have “no-fault” divorce — one party must assign blame to the other or they must both agree to a Separation Agreement, and then abide by it for one year, before either can sue for a “conversion” divorce. The spouse who doesn’t want the divorce — or merely wants it less– can use the process to extract concessions from the initiating spouse that would not otherwise be available. Many lawyers help turn the process of creating a Separation Agreement between the spouses into a long, antagonizing and very expensive experience. Couples who want a quicker resolution, must often cook up phony evidence of fault (adultery, cruel treatment, etc.), a process that is far from edifying.


A Newsday article (Feb. 13, 2005) gives a good wrap-up of the issues and the players. 2HeartsV


The article quotes Kaye:

“After long and careful reflection, I have come to see that requiring strict ‘fault’ grounds may well simply intensify the bitterness between the parties, wasting resources, hurting children, driving residents to other states for a divorce andd elaying the inevitable dissolution of the marriage.”

Kaye also told the Legislature that revision of the Domestic Relations Law should “scrupulously safeguard the interests of the most vulnerable litigants — especially the already disadvantaged poor and victims of domestic violence — while providing needed relief from the fault requirement.”


Frankly, there still are many lawyers who oppose no-fault because they fear a loss of income. However, the principled stance of major bar groups across the state will hopefully help to make statements like the following in Newsday passe: “it might seem counterintuitive for lawyers to want to streamline a process that makes them money.”



tiny check Seven national library associations and the American Antitrust Institute sponsored an invitational symposium at Georgetown Law Center on Feb. 11, titled “Antitrust Issues in Scholarly and Legal Publishing.” The link will take you to a paper presented by AAI’s president, Bert Foer, and further information about the symposium.


tiny check Does any one know whether the NYS Bar House of Delegates acted on the proposed new definition of pro bono service that we panned here, when the met at the end of January?


2HeartsN A little pet peeving, brought on by the CNN.com article linked above, plus frequent visits to one of my favorite weblogs: Could people please stop using the phrase “eclectic mix.”Mixwill do just fine; we don’t need to be told your selection is also “eclectic.”. Nobody thinks the variety found in your reading list, record collection, or weblog content is totally random. And, the 416,000 results for the Google search eclectic mix”> confirms my suspicion that the phrase is over-used. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest. Even haikuEsq gets grumpy.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress