You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

March 18, 2005

so-called credentials, justice, haiku, etc.

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 3:57 pm


potluck

 
So-called credentials:  We can’t all have as many degrees as Elder Sibling  graduates flip 

(RiskProf) Martin F. Grace. Or, can we?  I just got a piece of spam that offers BAs,

MBAs, PhDs and more “Within two weeks!  No study required! 100% Verifiable!” 

It also warns that this legal loop-hole may be closed soon, due to all the public attention

it has lately received.  Just call “Issac Copeland” at 1-206-984-0021.




  • Alas, since I had read the Federal Trade Commission’s


    in early February, I was not fooled.  But, I do want to

    remind you that you can find the FTC consumer complaint

    form here, and that you should put the Government’s spam

    email collection address in your Address Book, so that

    you can simply forward spam directly to the folks who

    are trying to police against it:  SPAM@UCE.GOV

tiny check  So-called justiceEuguene Volokh ignited a firestorm two days ago,

when he wrote that vengeance using cold-blooded brutality was

appropriate punishment for some crimes.  I’m with Walter Olson (see

his post and links) on this one: Being human surely includes having the

emotional urge for vengeance against vile crimes, but it also means

having the wisdom and aspiration to overcome that urge in the name

of a better humanity and a better world.

 

yyS  So-Called Haiku:  If you want to see excellent proof that merely writing words

in three lines of 5 – 7 – 5 sylllables is not haiku, click on Em & Lo‘s winning “haikus”

in their Sex Ed for Grownups space at ProChoice American.org.   The contest

judges might want to check some of our resources to learn more about haiku, before

further sullying the name of the poetic genre.  For example, jim kacian’s haiku primer 

offers an in-depth analysis on how to write haiku.  dagosan’s haiku primer is a lot

shorter, and offers some quick tips in outline form from George Swede and Michael

D. Welch, at the bottom of the page. 




  • Almost by definition, haiku does not lend itself to declaring a political

    philosophy.  Perhaps a form of senryu might embrace the writer’s

    prochoice sentiments, but 17-syllable bumper stickers and sound bites

    are not haiku or senryu.  I’m sure Prof. Bainbridge would be glad to

    note that the last thing pro-choicers actually want to do is speak in

    graphic “sense images” about their subject.  (restrained thanks to

    George M. Wallace for the e-mail pointer.)




  • Most English-language haiku poets believe that the old

    17-syllable rule resulted from a misunderstanding of the

    Japanese language, and creates haiku that are very often

    padded, unnatural and stilted.   The only possible reason to

    insist on the 5 – 7 – 5-syllable rule in haiku contests like

    that held by Em & Lo is that, without such a structural

    artifice, there would be absolutely no way to distinguish

    the so-call haiku from aphorisms, doggerel, bumper-stickers

    and t-shirt philosophy.

 

tiny check  So-called Publicity Stunt:  Speaking of Prof. B, I’m not quite as sure

as he about just which congressional action this week is purely a


 

tiny check  So-called Consumer Protection:  (1)  George and Steve have   pig black flip

rightly mocked the coming ban on wild mushrooms at California farmers’

markets and grocers.   (2)  Lawyer Thomas Daly, former partner in

the “Law Centers for Consumer Protection,” testified yesterday

in the federal fraud trial against his old boss, Andrew Capoccia,

(Bennington Banner article, March 18, 2005).  Daly testified that

“The law firm could not win a single lawsuit anywhere at any time.”

They moved to Vermont, when the law and ethics complaints made

New York too hot. .On Tuesday, another former employee testified

that she constantly used client escrow accounts to run the law firm. 

 


by dagosan:  






I hesitate —

the plumber’s

offered hand


 

                          

 

 







 

new leaves

soon!

savoring the winter view

 

 

 

 

 

 

St. Patrick’s Day —

drawing the

designated-driver straw





 

 

[March 18, 2005]

 

 

1 Comment

  1. Many Online Diplomas are Trash

    Although members of the media and some academicians have been saying that online instruction is the wave of the future, one simple fact remains: More than a few online schools provide a second-rate education and diplomas from online institutions are essentially trash.

    Until the summer of 2006, I was associated with a university that maintained a large online division in northern Virginia plus 43 satellite campuses in 10 southeastern states and the District of Columbia. For approximately five years I taught online business courses in both synchronous and asynchronous modes. To my chagrin, I discovered the following:

    • The school has no library to speak of. It maintains various “Learning Resource Centers” that collectively have 32,000 volumes or about one book for each of the estimated 27,000 students who study online or at satellite campuses. Indiana University’s library system, in contrast, has 8.2 million volumes.
    • Quizzes and exams are online, open-book and unproctored. Students routinely enlist others to help them at exam time.
    • There is pressure on instructors to give high grades and thereby maintain full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment numbers. Instructors who have the temerity to give grades of C or D are called in for counseling.
    • Students never meet or have direct contact with instructors.
    • The school has an open-enrollment policy which encourages unqualified or marginally qualified applicants. Nevertheless, approximately one-third of all students graduate with “honors.”

    Incredibly, this institution is accredited by the Middle States Commission on Higher Education.

    Gary Jacobsen, B.S., M.B.A
    Member, American Association of University Professors

    Comment by Gary Jacobsen — September 7, 2006 @ 4:19 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress