“The American Jury: We the People in Action” is the theme for Law Day 2005, which
falls on May 1st, but will be celebrated on May 2nd in many locations. There will be no more
cynical stuff from me on the topic of Law Day for this year (unless extremely provoked). As
Alexis de Tocqueville reminded us in his Democracy in America:
The jury, which is the most energetic means of making the people rule,
is also the most efficacious means of teaching it how to rule well… The jury …
may be regarded as a … public school, ever open, in which every juror learns
his rights.
If you haven’t celebrated Law Day yet with your kids (or your office mates), I suggest one of
the following activities:
taking the ABA’s Law Day true-false quiz on juries and discussing the
answers (advance preparation highly recommended);
printing out the Michigan Bar Association’s Law Day official Coloring Contest
picture — with jury, lawyer, judge and witness, plus a few questions — and sharing
a fun learning experience;
discussing one or more of the MBA’s Law Day “Should” Questions about juries,
each of which has a link to a related U.S. Supreme Court Case;
choose from the ABA’s Law Day 2005 Lessons and brainstorm:
- K-6: Choosing an Impartial Jury
- 7-9: What Juries Should Hear and See
- 10-12: Juries: Cornerstone of Democracy
- Extra: Jury Resources
experiencing the jury selection process, with the Voir Dire Simulation by
Julie Van Camp.
The ABA’s Law Day theme page got it right about juries:
“The jury is the embodiment of democracy. We entrust juries—small
bodies of ordinary men and women—with decisions that involve the
liberties and property of defendants. In doing so, we confirm our faith
in the ability of people to make just and wise decisions, and that is the
very definition of democracy. We also see the jury system as an opportunity
to educate Americans in law, legal processes, and decision-making in a
democracy.”
In First Democracy: The Challenge of an Ancient Idea (Oxford Press, 2005), Prof. Paul
Woodruff makes clear that no system of government is truly a democracy, if it does
not believe in the wisdom of its public to listen to and debate issues, and then make wise
decisions. He asks some hard questions about whether we’re educating the American
public in a way that will ensure a citizenry that is informed and capable of such civic
wisdom. That’s another good subject for Law Day.
spring breeze–
the clay doll
gets some color
hands clapping
mother teaches her child
the dance
for the painted faced
maiden too…
spring dusk
potluck
Ken Standard, the President of the New York State Bar Association, stressed
judicial independence in his Law Day remarks on April 29th:
“At every opportunity, our bar association has sought to educate,
pointing out how essential is judicial independence to the effective
functioning of not just our judicial system, but our society, too.
“Of our judges, we ask for consistent, evenhanded and impartial
application of the law to all cases that come before them… We ask
judges to maintain a delicate balance of decisional independence,
discretion, self-restraint and accountability.
“We ask the executive branch and lawmakers to refrain from and
reject proposals that would cut or freeze judiciary budgets or salaries.
We ask those who nominate, appoint or approve judges to select only
hard to believe that France used to be the source for terminology used around
the world (m’aidez!). If radiotelephone terminology were derived from current
American English, what would the distress call be? “Yo!” “Yo!” Expletive Included.
In his NYT column today (May 1, 2005), Nicholas Kristoff wonders if we Baby
Boomer swill go down in history as The Greediest Generation. Kristoff worries that self-
centered Boomers will use their political clout to demand more resources for themselves,
creating “fiscal child abuse” (a term borrowed from Laurence Kotlikoff, who, with Scott
Burns, wrote The Coming Generational Storm):
“In coming years, we’ll hear appeals for better nursing homes, for more
Alzheimer’s research and for more wheelchair-accessible office buildings,
and those are good causes. But remember that American children are almost
twice as likely as the elderly to live in poverty, and that you get much more
bang for the buck vaccinating a child than paying for open-heart surgery.
. . . Our top domestic priorities should be to ensure that all children get health
care and to get our fiscal house in order.”
tagging along
with an ice cream cone
the senior partner
Barry George, J.D.
I found it particularly ironic that our law school’s Law Day event can’t be attended by most of the students because we can’t afford to go. Ah…equality under the law.
Comment by Beanie — May 2, 2005 @ 9:33 am
I found it particularly ironic that our law school’s Law Day event can’t be attended by most of the students because we can’t afford to go. Ah…equality under the law.
Comment by Beanie — May 2, 2005 @ 9:33 am
Beanie, You haven’t given me enough facts to understand your complaint. I wouldn’t think that “equality under the law” has much to do with attending a Law Day event. Tell us more, please.
Comment by David Giacalone — May 2, 2005 @ 11:48 am
Beanie, You haven’t given me enough facts to understand your complaint. I wouldn’t think that “equality under the law” has much to do with attending a Law Day event. Tell us more, please.
Comment by David Giacalone — May 2, 2005 @ 11:48 am
I’ve always understood that Law Day honors those in the community who have done the most to promote pro bono work in the legal community. I find it particularly irksome that those who are supposed to emulate such activities aren’t able to attend due to the cost prohibitive nature of the event.
Comment by Beanie — May 2, 2005 @ 2:03 pm
I’ve always understood that Law Day honors those in the community who have done the most to promote pro bono work in the legal community. I find it particularly irksome that those who are supposed to emulate such activities aren’t able to attend due to the cost prohibitive nature of the event.
Comment by Beanie — May 2, 2005 @ 2:03 pm
I still can’t read your mind, Beanster. What is the event and what does it cost? If it’s a fund-raiser, perhaps being irked is not the best response. Who sponsors it, and aren’t there any local activities tied in with the Jury theme?
Comment by David Giacalone — May 2, 2005 @ 2:21 pm
I still can’t read your mind, Beanster. What is the event and what does it cost? If it’s a fund-raiser, perhaps being irked is not the best response. Who sponsors it, and aren’t there any local activities tied in with the Jury theme?
Comment by David Giacalone — May 2, 2005 @ 2:21 pm