You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

October 12, 2005

on Harriet, it’s “wait and see” / “schmait & see”

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 4:06 pm

If the rowdy citizens of the blogisphere were in charge of the

Nation, we’d have only lynch mobs and kangaroo courts.  For

proof, see Prof. Bainbridge‘s new Harriet Miers Poll.  So far,

almost no one is willing to “Wait and See.”

 

kangarooG  This plays into the hands of observers who believe

that many Conservatives who talk about “strict constructionism”

and “originalism” are mostly into “resultism”  Of course, it

could also be that webloggers and their public would rather

have an opinion than a considered judgment about the important

issues of the day. (see blawggers mug Old Gray Lady)  And, it

surely seems, that those Federalistales are very big on woe-is-we

martyrdom, mixed with a dash of narcissism. 

 

As for this poll, perhaps a better set of choices would have been:




Leaning For

 

Leaning Against

 

Wait-and-See

Then, we could at least have a semblance of open minds.




 

 

plungeGraphG

 

 

the baby
sucking her thumb
moongazes

 

 

 

 







as the spider

goes down the drain

a second thought

 


 


“as the spider” – Upstate Dim Sum (2003/I)

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                               kangarooN

 

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress