You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

February 7, 2006

bummr: where did all those e’s go?

Filed under: pre-06-2006 — David Giacalone @ 1:35 pm

We’ve been so busy fighting the “blawg” scourge that threatens

our profession and language, that we almost missed the brave

cultural/linguisitc battle launched by Microsoft’s Robert Scoble

on February 5, 2006:


deleteKey n “I’ve seen several geek projects lately use the

‘r’ naming that Flickr made popular and I don’t like it.”

Valleywag joined the fray in defense of the English Language,

explaining Scoble’s cause and then offering a kinder, and

perhaps more effective response:


Robrt Scoble says he’s sick of Flickr-style *r names

like Grabbr and retrievr and gtalkr (and talkr and flagr

and Bloggr and gabbr and Frappr). But should the

Microsoft bloggr be kindr in his dismissal?”

 

Valleywag readrs are urged to donate “e”s to needy

trendoids. By cutting “e”s and passing on the credits

to these Web 2.0 victims, you too can be a hro.”

 

                                                                           eKeyS 

                                                                                eKeyS

That’s right, Scoble wants the “e” put back in the “agent”

-er suffix. Valleywag is right that we should try to help the

culturally impoverished, who are so indifferent or ignorant of

their language legacy.   To help those who are particularly im-

pervious to subtle gestures, we suggest that you dig out any

old, unused Scrabble games and remove the 12  “e” tiles.

Then, send one each to the dozen trendoids you know who

most need a reminder of how our language operates (perhaps

with instructions).

 

We want to go further, however, and try to understand this

hypo-e disorder — especially after having such informative

discussions recently with two linguists at Language Log.

You can help by commenting on some of the possible

theories and suggesting your own:

 

blackboard abcN


tiny check Virtually Out of E’s:  Did our troubled trendoids

simply run out of e’s over the last decade, after

sticking one in front of every pre-existing concept

that found its way into computers or onto the internet?

 

tiny check Spawn of Blog: Having so casually maimed the

word “weblog” by chopping off its “we-,” did they

grow up without any sense of conscience over

abandonment of e’s and other forms of language

abuse and neglect?


eKeyS Note, though:  Creating that ugly,

little word to denominate weblogs

should have created a surplus by now of

trillions of extra e’s. (The w’s, however,

were surely used up in all those URLs,

because compu-nerds took the only letter that

is not mono-syllabic and used it three times

— forcing speakers to say 9 syllables when-

ever giving out a website address.  Sorry,

wrong vent.)

tiny check IM-Blackberry Dis-e’s:  Have constant use of

instant messaging and tiny handheld devices burned

out the crucial “e” synapses in trendoid brains,

while also rapidly aging their thumbs?

 

tiny check  Vanity Plate Syndrome:  Have the trendoids done

most of their real-word reading in traffic, at red lights 

— thus mistaking license plate lingo for literature?

One thing for sure: haiku writers did not cause the shrinkage

of the agent-e-suffix.  We don’t care about letter count, and

Flickr, Grabbr and the rest still have two syllables each.

 

We need your input and your e’s.  You’ve (almost) never let

us down before.  Don’t start now.  No Quittrs allowed.


tiny check  Special thanks to TechLaw Advisr Kevin Hellr

for the great pointr.  (makes my skincrawl just

looking at those pathetic e-less non-words.)

                                                                                      ScrabbleE

 

update (Feb. 6, 6 PM): I don’t know whether UPenn linguist   

Benjamin Zimmer talks fast, but he surely does read and type

quickly.  He’s already posted at Language Log in reaction to

this post, reminding us of prior campaigns seeking the

donation of letters.

 

update (Feb. 7, 2005): A Comment from Pat M. pointed me

to Georges Perec‘s 2005 novel A Void (translated from the

French by Gilbert Adair):  The book was written (and trans-

lated) without using the letter “e.”  This tour de force deserves

its own post, and it got one today — sought: haiku-sans-e, in

which haiku poets are asked to submit a haiku that is e-less.

 

NoER A Void, by Georges Perec

 

 


here are examples of some real English and real haiku

from teacher Tom Painting and accountant paul m:


 

midday blues

a row of icicles

taking shape

 

 

 

 


nursing home

my father

the way I left him

 

 

 


“midday blues” – mariposa 13

“nursing home” – Haiku Poets of No. Calif,

         senryu contest, hon mention 2004

 





daffodil shoots–

all these years

as an accountant

 

 

dandelionClock





 

 

orderly fields

of an Amish farm

the things I can’t tell her

 

 

 

 



drifting seed fluff . . .

the rented horse

knows an hour’s worth

 

 

“orderly fields” – Acorn 14

daffodil shoots” – The Heron’s Nest (Sept. 2005)

drifting seed fluff” – The Heron’s Nest (June 2005)



 

                                                                ScrabbleEn

 

6 Comments

  1. Your “e” rant reminded me of one of my favorite e-songs, “Silent E,” by Tom Lehrer. Here are the lyrics:

    Who can turn a can into a cane?
    Who can turn a pan into a pane?
    It’s not too hard to see
    It’s silent e

    Who can turn a cub into a cube?
    Who can turn a tub into a tube?
    It’s elementary
    For silent e

    He took a pin and turned it into pine
    He took a twin and turned him into twine

    Who can turn a cap into a cape?
    Who can turn a tap into a tape?
    A little glob becomes a globe instantly
    If you just add silent e

    He turned a dam – alikazam! – into a dame
    But my friend sam stayed just the same

    Who can turn a man into a mane?
    Who can turn a van into a vane?
    A little hug becomes huge instantly
    Don’t add w, don’t add x, and don’t add y or z,
    Just add silent e

    Perhaps the “offendrs” are just afraid of the power of silent e.

    Also, as I fellow Scrabble fan, I highly recommend “Word Freak” by Stefan Fatsis. It’s all about the world of competitive Scrabble.

    Comment by Lisa Solomon — February 7, 2006 @ 9:34 pm

  2. Your “e” rant reminded me of one of my favorite e-songs, “Silent E,” by Tom Lehrer. Here are the lyrics:

    Who can turn a can into a cane?
    Who can turn a pan into a pane?
    It’s not too hard to see
    It’s silent e

    Who can turn a cub into a cube?
    Who can turn a tub into a tube?
    It’s elementary
    For silent e

    He took a pin and turned it into pine
    He took a twin and turned him into twine

    Who can turn a cap into a cape?
    Who can turn a tap into a tape?
    A little glob becomes a globe instantly
    If you just add silent e

    He turned a dam – alikazam! – into a dame
    But my friend sam stayed just the same

    Who can turn a man into a mane?
    Who can turn a van into a vane?
    A little hug becomes huge instantly
    Don’t add w, don’t add x, and don’t add y or z,
    Just add silent e

    Perhaps the “offendrs” are just afraid of the power of silent e.

    Also, as I fellow Scrabble fan, I highly recommend “Word Freak” by Stefan Fatsis. It’s all about the world of competitive Scrabble.

    Comment by Lisa Solomon — February 7, 2006 @ 9:34 pm

  3. Thank you for sharing, Lisa.  Good lyrics.  Of course, you’ve reminded me of one of my biggest language-abuse complaints:  In the past two decades — thanks largely to people in the music industry and the names they’ve given themselves — our younger folk have no concept of the Silent E Rule.  Not only can “can” be pronounced like “cain”, but “cane” can be pronounced like “canny.” 
    We have let them take the language whose pronunciation rules and customs are probably the most difficult in human history and make them many times harder.  It is much more difficult to look at any word [especially names] and know how it is pronounced, or to hear a word and know how it is spelled. 
    As for “Word Freak,” I’ve seen it and found it interesting and enjoyable, but could not relate very well to all the memorization and stress [and geekiness].  Of course, I say this as someone who once knew all the two-letter words in the Scrabble dictionary — but, who has forgotten many of them and won’t let myself look up the latest list.

    Comment by David Giacalone — February 7, 2006 @ 10:38 pm

  4. Thank you for sharing, Lisa.  Good lyrics.  Of course, you’ve reminded me of one of my biggest language-abuse complaints:  In the past two decades — thanks largely to people in the music industry and the names they’ve given themselves — our younger folk have no concept of the Silent E Rule.  Not only can “can” be pronounced like “cain”, but “cane” can be pronounced like “canny.” 
    We have let them take the language whose pronunciation rules and customs are probably the most difficult in human history and make them many times harder.  It is much more difficult to look at any word [especially names] and know how it is pronounced, or to hear a word and know how it is spelled. 
    As for “Word Freak,” I’ve seen it and found it interesting and enjoyable, but could not relate very well to all the memorization and stress [and geekiness].  Of course, I say this as someone who once knew all the two-letter words in the Scrabble dictionary — but, who has forgotten many of them and won’t let myself look up the latest list.

    Comment by David Giacalone — February 7, 2006 @ 10:38 pm

  5. Just another absent e curiosity: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1567922961/qid=1139417207/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-3198114-1938431?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

    Comment by Pat M. — February 8, 2006 @ 11:51 am

  6. Just another absent e curiosity: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1567922961/qid=1139417207/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-3198114-1938431?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

    Comment by Pat M. — February 8, 2006 @ 11:51 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress