The Albany, NY, version of The Business Review-bizjournal tried today
to make sense of the New York State Bar Association’s crusade to
improve the image of lawyers by eliminating “sleazy,” inappropriate ads.
“Savvy or sleazy: Bar tackles tricky issue of attorney advertisements,”
by Eric Durr, Feb. 13, 2006. (treated at length in our prior post, Nov. 18,
2005)The article is worth a read, with quotes from: the crusading NYSBA pres-
ident, A. Vincent Buzard; a lawyer using “heavy hitter” ads; a couple of ad
agency heads (one of whom does not want p/i lawyer clients); and the (in)-
famous E. Stewart Jones (see porior posts here, here, and there). Jones,
one of the biggest lawyer advertisers in the NY Capital Region, is quoted
saying about advertising:
“I think it’s a plague on the profession,” and “I recommend its abolition.”
“There are no restrictions on what people can say about themselves. It
does more to misinform.“It has become a necessary evil because it is such a competitive business
that if you don’t advertise, you don’t get your name out. You have to fight fire
with fire.”Jones, who is on local tv being interviewed spouting and spinning defense lawyer clap-
trap more than any other attorney, adds: “Many of them are just absolutely tasteless.
It’s just a tawdry process. It cheapens the profession. If people see something is on
television, they think it’s great.”
For my money (and my viscera), entertainment and copyright lawyer Paul C. Rapp,
who teaches those subjects as an adjunct professor at Albany Law School, makes
the most sense (and, coincidentally, sounds a lot like the f/k/a gang) on the NYSBA
push to approve lawyer ads, in advance, for appropriateness and their effect on lawyer
image. Rapp says ” In some ways the whole notion of doing that seems dangerous
and misguided.” He adds:
“The whole idea of trying to maintain the dignity of an entire profession,
and especially the legal profession — which I don’t have to quote Shakespeare
to you to tell you [that] for centuries this has not been grea t– by trying to
control how attorneys represent themselves, seems almost silly.”
“buzardMug”
a. vincent buzard
Seeing Vince Buzard continue this battle — his top priority as bar President — against
the First Amendment and the forces of competition makes me wonder: Why would
any bar association choose him to lead their association? Why, indeed. (hint: see
our bar & guild essay)
I wonder what Kobayashi Issa would have to say
about all this, from his perspective in early 19th Century Japan?
they even sell
the swamp’s lotuses…
leaf and blossom
river boat–
on a night of fireworks
still selling fireworks
harvest moon–
the peddler selling
eight cent sake
they even sell tea
not worth a fart!
summer trees
selling morning-glories
wet with morning dew…
a tough character
translated by David G. Lanoue
February 13, 2006
perspectives on NYSBA’s war on lawyer ads
Comments Off on perspectives on NYSBA’s war on lawyer ads
No Comments
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.