the guy by the door …

12:58P Give me a few minutes.

1:04P I’m thinking.

4:10P I had to go to a cosmology seminar to regain my composure – watching galaxy clusters collide. It’s peaceful in some ways. They mostly pass through each other, but the gas gets striped out of them. Black holes are very violent. They eat matter spiralling in to them and spit x-rays and radio waves out. Fortunately none of them are in our immediate neighborhood – the solar system. There’s a really big one at the center of the Milky Way, but it won’t eat us anytime soon. We have angular momentum. Nothing dissipates angular momentum in a serious way except gravitational radiation.¹

I don’t know if I can fully explain my title before the polls close. For now, let just indicate my choices for City Council:

1. Philip Fenstermacher

I will write myself in. No candidate has put forward a platform that seems to me truly progressive in terms of the cacophony of crises we face. I drew papers to get on the ballot, but got sick and had to go to the hospital. I was somewhat victimized by the false rumors about how a sticker campaign works, but if I had been serious I would have checked with the Election Commission. I have no campaign manager and no money. My platform most likely would have caused Glenn Koocher to brand me as unelectable – at best 🙂 I don’t think Cambridge has ever elected a homeless person. It would be an honor to be the first. It is unlikely. I will get at least one vote and surely less than 50 which, by the rules of proportional representation, means I personally will not pass to the second round as a candidate. If by some miracle, I make it into later rounds, I will be cut from the bottom. If you want a protest gesture that won’t cost you anything, sticker me in.

2. Lawrence Adkins

An eloquent plain speaking African-American man from Riverside. If elected, I think he would probably revive the spirit of Saundra Graham. But he won’t be. He got 15% of quota on the first round in ’97. He’ll survive into the second round. My vote will transfer to him. But he doesn’t have much money and his ’97 performance was far behind the incumbents. It’s doubtful he’ll be seated. So.

3. Minka van Beuzkom

A woman from Central Square who has been active in the area especially in the areas of public health and environment. I don’t know if she ever followed on her threat to bring some of the rats that are infesting parts of Cambridge into the Sullivan Chamber, but I like the spirit. She pulled of a Toomey with her nomination papers. She gathered a full 100 signatures over 4th of July weekend – the sign of an dedicated organized core of support. The bad news is that she has 1/3 the money of Davis and Decker. The good news is she has almost as much money as Seidel. She has a good chance – not a sure thing.

4. Marj Decker has been the most stridently antiwar counselor, but she hasn’t solved the problem that has plagued the peace movement for as long as there has been one. How do you answer these two questions at the same time.

I. Who really benefits from war?
II. What did my daughter die for?

Nobody else has. I have ideas, but …

Marj is good on the potpourri of progressive issues. I do wish though that she wouldn’t talk to me as if she didn’t put her pants on one leg at a time.

Anyway, despite the gaff with her election papers, she’s an incumbant with a strong base and more money than anybody else! The only real question mark is, will people not want to write her in? I’m not counting her out. Despite any rumors to the contrary, a sticker candidate is treated the same as any other. You can vote them at any preference. If you like Marj to any degree, sticker her in!

5:48P It’s getting late so I must get sketchy. Besides if my vote hasn’t stuck by this point, I can’t find someone to give it to who both needs it and has a chance of being elected. Anyway.

5. Silvia Glick

6. Tom Stohlman

7. Kathy Podgers

———

¹You may occasionally come across the phrase ‘gravity waves’. This is the name that physicists of the last century assigned to waves propagating on the surface of water. Gravity provides the restoring force.