• Home
  • About
  • Blog (ARCHIVE)
  • News (ARCHIVE)
  • Events
  • Media
  • Video
  • Glossary
  • Contact
  • Download
  • RSS

About: mollysauter

mollysauter
Profile:

Website

Contact:

Email mollysauter

Posts by mollysauter

Will the U.S. get an Internet “Kill Switch”?

Mar 4, 2011

In the past month we’ve seen two countries try to “turn off” the Internet. On January 27, in Egypt, which had previously known few restrictions on Internet access (though, to be sure, intimidation of bloggers and activists was common), nearly all ISPs stopped delivering bits to their subscribers, even though data transiting Egypt from the […]

Read | 5 Comments | Tags: cybersecurity · news

Wikileaks FAQ

Dec 7, 2010

I just finished recording a podcast with Larry Lessig and the Berkman fellows about Wikileaks.  It should be online within a day or two.  In the meantime, we’ve been trying to simply nail down some of the facts surrounding the situation.  We figured we’d share what we’ve gathered so far as a FAQ, and we’ll […]

Read | 49 Comments | Tags: Future of the Internet

Systems for managing book reseach chaos

Oct 18, 2010

JZ asked for suggestions of good note-managing systems, and here’s what y’all said: “Scrivener on Mac is awesome.” “Zotero add-on for Firefox. Free and syncs across computers.” “Try Devon Agent + Devon Note for research and Avenir for writing.” “Tiddlywiki is the way to go.It is simple, versatile, portable, platform independent and very effective.” “If […]

Read | 4 Comments | Tags: Future of the Internet

Blog Archives

 

@ruchowdh @BKCHarvard Welcome — delighted to be working together!

Last week from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@restoreorderusa @AlecMacGillis I mean, points 2 and 3 don’t even make any sense! How would anyone know if a cited article has been read, and by whom? Did they survey readers and ask them? And does it add up that 50% of all articles (whether cited or not) aren’t read, while *80%* of cited articles aren’t read? pic.twitter.com/876e4vfdJ0

About 3 weeks ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@restoreorderusa @AlecMacGillis I guess it’s fitting that the eye-opening statistics here are sourced to a news article that in turn cites to a non-peer-reviewed op-ed that in turn cites to … nothing, with no methodology for how these numbers are arrived at. Truly no real basis (so far) to believe them.

About 3 weeks ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@byrdinator @MattGlassman312 Fascinating. Would these amendments be entertained before or after any conferencing with the Senate to reconcile differences? If after, there’s danger of infinite amendment loops. If not, won’t the few members in conference get the last word before a final up-or-down vote?

Last month from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone

@bendreyfuss It does happen every so often. This incident was so brazen that Congress later reversed the provision. The staffer who quietly put the amendment in is now the CEO of the RIAA. salon.com/2000/08/28/wor… pic.twitter.com/mAW3InOECq

About a month ago from Jonathan Zittrain's Twitter via Twitter for iPhone



Creative Commons BY-NC-SA Jonathan Zittrain unless otherwise noted.
Powered by WordPress using Gridline Lite.
Protected by Akismet • Blog with WordPress