The Evolution of Privacy on the Net
Something that really struck me in the reading & our class discussion was the seemingly ever-present problem of privacy on the internet; even in the web’s literal origins, people had qualms about their privacy. As we discussed in class, it began with the “finger protocol.” Here’s an excerpt from Where Wizards Stay Up Late by Katie Hefner and Matthew Lyon that explains it well:
The FINGER controversy, a debate over privacy on the Net, occurred in early 1979 and involved some of the worst flaming in the MsgGroup’s experience. The fight was over the introduction, at Carnegie-Mellon, of an electronic widget that allowed users to peek into the on-line habits of other users on the Net. The FINGER command had been created in the early 1970s by a computer scientist named Les Earnest at Stanford’s Artificial Intelligence Lab. “People generally worked long hours there, often with unpredictable schedules,” Earnest said. “When you wanted to meet with some group, it was important to know who was there and when the others would likely reappear. It also was important to be able to locate potential volleyball players when you wanted to play, Chinese-food freaks when you wanted to eat, and antisocial computer users when it appeared that something strange was happening on the system.” FINGER didn’t allow you to read someone else’s messages, but you could tell the date and time of the person’s last log-on and when last he or she had read mail. Some people had a problem with that.
We discussed in class that possible reasons people would have a problem with this could include wanting to be able to ignore messages when busy without people knowing, not wanting people do know if they missed work on certain days, and more. This issue can be followed all the way to the modern internet; in May of 2012, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, had a very sensitive instant messenger leak. His messages over AIM from 2004 were released, and, in one, he calls users of Facebook “dumb f–ks.” He calls them (us, I guess) this because they gave him their “emails, pictures, addresses” and more. Nowadays, we openly give our location to “Snap Maps” 24 hours a day, we give Facebook far more than those three parameters, we don’t blink when Google Maps gives us directions home before we even look at our phones when we get in the car, and more. An important but perhaps obvious question is: have we begun to care less about our privacy on the internet? And the truly pressing question is: why?
I believe, of course, modern users of the internet are far more cavalier about privacy. However, the reasoning for that can be speculated about a lot; perhaps modern internet users simply know less of the dangers of sacrificing privacy than the internet pioneers did. Or, one could argue that the internet has simply become so integrated into our lives that it seems silly to try and be “separate” from it.
Greg Satell of Forbes Magazine released an article in 2014 entitled “Let’s Face It, We Don’t Really Care About Privacy.” In it, he argues that the “cost” of privacy has gone up. In order to have privacy, one would have to sacrifice their use of, say, their Facebook and LinkedIn. This would be sacrificing potential social and financial opportunities. This aligns well with the idea that the internet is just too important to hide from nowadays. What do you all think? Can we still preserve privacy in this day and age? Should we even try? Why aren’t we trying? Why did we seem ultimately unfazed by the idea that Google stores all voice commands online when discussed in class? Let me know your thoughts.