american jury, to ivygate

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Charles Nesson
Date: Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:36 AM
Subject: american jury
To: IvyGate

what if the net itself became a learning machine

we can identify where the differences are among us

we could engage in process that would moderate them

we the jury of the internet, the court of public opinion

we need questions soundly framed for us

we need established form which if worked to its ideal will provide structured process for us

feel this in the federal rules of civil procedure

what are the rules within civil procedure for processing a claim that an opponent is abusing process

is it a defense for them that they have the congress on their side when we can show the disproportion in lobbying strength between their side and our side

can we as a cyberone class organize effective use of the civil process the plaintiffs claims make available to us to give substance to our counterclaim

3 Responses to “american jury, to ivygate”


  • I just wanted to say that from a struggling musicians standpoint your tenacity to take upon the federal courts about music sharing is bold and courageous. I wish you the best of luck and hope that this ridiculous law is stricken.

    What is music if it can’t be shared? The ones making money out of this are not the artists, but rather lonely men that can’t play guitar.

  • An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people”

    What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language?

    An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution

    The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation

    Let’s direct the effort of programmers toward law instead of letting them waiste their talents solidifying the values of for profit corporations in the net

    Test on a small scale, in Cyberone.

  • An algorithm for the Constitution of the United States modified by “we the people”

    What would the rights guaranteed by the constitution look like in program language?

    An input-output machine that checks the language of any internet process with the algorithm of the Constitution

    The court of public opinion constantly changing this program’s language after disputes are resolved would lend necessary due process and law formation

    Test on a small scale, in Cyberone

Comments are currently closed.