Recent HLS graduate Jim Freeman (’03), and the organization he works for, the Advancement Project, were included in a recent New York Times article about the debate occurring on the zero tolerance policies that have been implemented in many schools across the country. The idea is to punish swiftly and severely, which is often popular among parents, but questioned by administrators and other school officials.

This is being hotly debated, as the article explains, because a recent case of a girl getting suspended for the semester at her high school is being heard in the North Carolina Supreme Court. At issue is her suspension, but also whether lesser offenses (profanity, for example) should be met with the same harsh “zero tolerance” approaches that may be warranted in drug or violence cases in schools. Statistics show that the zero tolerance policy is proven to be effective but controversial as well. You can check out the full article here. To read more about Jim’s organization, you can visit the Advancement Project’s website.


3 Comments so far

  1. Pro Bono on September 1, 2011 9:33 pm

    There has to be a happy medium between Zero tolerance, and common sense. Kids are going to fight and react to situations without thinking.

    I agree with Zero Tolerance when it comes to weapons in school but with other infractions maybe a two or three strikes and your out policy is more appropriate.

  2. Lawyers Asheville on September 30, 2011 9:44 am

    North Carolina has always been this way

  3. Randy Turner on July 31, 2012 11:14 pm

Name (required)

Email (required)


Speak your mind