In the popular conception, open-access journals generate revenue by charging publication fees. The popular conception turns out to be false. Various studies have explored the extent to which OA journals charge publication fees. The results have been counterintuitive to many, indicating that far fewer OA journals charge publication fees than one might have thought. You can verify this yourself using some software I provide in this post.
- The occasional pamphlet from the virtual writing-desk of Stuart Shieber, on scholarly communication and other topics.
Pages
Subscribe by email
@pmphlt says…
If you'd like me to continue to follow you on Mastodon, make sure to put your Mastodon username in your own profile, so that tools like debirdify, twitodon, and fedifinder can do their work. 4/4
About 4 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
What happens in the longer term is up in the air. Further action by Twitter to stop Mastodon linking and other aggressions will speed up my transition. 3/4
About 4 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
My plan going forward, for the time being at least, is to continue to post identically at Twitter and Mastodon, but I will restrict my replies and other "engagement" to Mastodon. 2/4
About 4 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Having a serious allergy to drama, I'm trying out Mastodon as a Twitter alternative. For any followers who would like to follow me at the new location, I've put my Mastodon username in my Twitter display name. 1/4
About 4 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Since we first distributed our #goodOA guide 10 years ago today, over 70 institutions have enacted simpatico #openaccess policies. We'd love to know (harvard.goodoa@gmail.com) if it's helped you too! bit.ly/goodoa h/t @petersuber
About 6 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Moderating principles blogs.harvard.edu/pamphlet/20…
About 9 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
@srush_nlp @redpony @yoavgo …but they'd probably argue that matching up of words and corresponding letters is not a *syntactic* requirement, much as in their argument against "respectively" constructions in section 4 of <jstor.org/stable/25001071>. Rather, it's a semantic or even pragmatic phenomenon. 2/2
Last year from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
@srush_nlp @redpony @yoavgo I'm assuming @yoavgo is thinking of an argument that the full phrase and its acronym display a cross-serial dependency, as in the CSDDSG example? I'd defer to Pullum and Gazdar (GaP) on this, ... 1/2
Last year from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Elsewhere
Video/Audio
- 2004.11.30: Johns Hopkins University
- 2007.04.05: Harvard MBB Seminar
- 2008.06.28: SPARC-ACRL Forum
- 2008.10.8: Columbia
- 2008.11.12: CRCS, Harvard
- 2009.03.26: CalTech
- 2010.06.28: Communia Conference, Torino, Italy
- 2010.10.29: Why Books? Radcliffe Institute
- 2011.01.12: APE 2011, Berlin
- 2011.01.13: SOAP 2011, Berlin
- 2011.10.07: Congresso Internacional SIBiUSP 30 Anos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- 2011.11.08: Berlin 9
- 2012.10.22: Berkman, OA Week (w/ Peter Suber)
- 2012.10.27: In Re Books, New York Law School
- 2013.09.11: CBC Radio interview
- 2014.01.26: Festival delle Scienze, Rome, Italy
- 2014.04.04: Berkman Center Directors panel for CopyrightX
- 2014.10.10: Office Hours: Gary King and Stuart Shieber on Open Access and Dissertations
- 2015.04.13: CNI Spring Conference
- 2015.12.01: Munin Conference, Tromsø, Norway
Archives
Search
Categories
Meta
Theme: Jentri by Phu.