HIV/AIDS Monitor at the Center for Global Development
There is a new HIV/AIDS Monitor at the Center for Global Development. The aim of this resource is to assess how well the large amounts of money from UNAIDS, PEPFAR and other sources are being spent. Looks to be very interesting, particularly in light of the recent GAO study (link to WaPo article on the topic) which suggested that the abstinence-only provisions are putting a damper on the quality of programming for AIDS funding.
I am not sure if the GAO is the last word on this topic, but some of the elements from the study were disconcerting (and echo some of Helen Epstein’s concerns from the New York Review of Books from last year). Here are some of the choice sections from the Post piece on the issue:
The final paragraphs of the article suggest that the fears of undo restrictions on actual work on the ground may be overblown. I think this is something CGD and other monitoring efforts need to get a handle on.
The office also exempts some countries’ programs from meeting the abstinence-spending target as long as the entire overseas AIDS-prevention budget meets it. Ten of the 20 countries surveyed got exemptions.
Filed under: Politics and Policy