rihlib - August 31, 2005 @ 2:35 pm
· Filed under News sources
In the Onion, the headline blares :”Google Announces Plan To Destroy All Information It Can’t Index”
rihlib - August 23, 2005 @ 11:40 am
· Filed under News sources
The Los Alamos National Laboratory Library Newsletter quotes some
interesting statistics about how teenagers navigate the online
world.
rihlib - August 15, 2005 @ 11:36 am
· Filed under News sources
According to the New York Times, Google said it would give publishers
the chance to opt out of having their works scanned in the massive
library project. Google intends to go ahead with scanning
material in the public domain.
rihlib - July 11, 2005 @ 12:42 pm
· Filed under News sources
A listing of things people could not find searching on Google.
Wonder if the people at Google Answers are reading this. (Source:
LISNews)
rihlib - June 14, 2005 @ 4:26 pm
· Filed under News sources
With Acronyma, you can decipher acronyms. You can also find
acronyms with certain words. A form for submitting acronyms is
also available. (Source: ResearchBuzz)
rihlib - June 1, 2005 @ 10:53 am
· Filed under News sources
Reports on a survey showing the average person spends at least an hour
a day on e-mail, with suggestions for lessening usage. (Source;
The Virtual Chase)
rihlib - May 23, 2005 @ 10:58 am
· Filed under News sources
rihlib - April 29, 2005 @ 3:40 pm
· Filed under News sources
Many reviews of the new Mac OS, including this extended piece by John
Siracusa that really gets into the guts of it…(Source; Daypop) For those who want just an overview, see David Pogue’s NYT overview. Also Hiawatha Bray speculates on the potential for PC-to-Mac converts.
rihlib - March 15, 2005 @ 9:24 am
· Filed under News sources
On speculation that the New York Times and other newspapers may start
charging users to read online content. (Source: beSpacific)
rihlib - March 7, 2005 @ 9:57 am
· Filed under News sources
An HBS Workling Knowledge column offers several examples of how to make
e-mail more efficient and ensure that people might actually read your
messages. (Source: beSpacific)