You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Week 11: Cyber Identities

Our seminar this week was particularly interesting – I especially liked the discussion related to online identity.

 

I’d like to explore Sherry Turkle’s TED talk a bit more, as it didn’t explicitly get talked about in class (also bringing in a bit of extra reading and info from my sociology class.) While I hadn’t seen this exact TED talk video before, I had read some of Turkle’s articles and portions of her book Alone Together. We could consider Turkle a cyber-dystopian, one who is skeptical or cautious about technology’s role in our lives. (Interestingly, she says in the beginning of her talk that she was previously a cyber-utopian, praising the possibilities for transforming one’s identity using the medium of the internet.)

 

She’s definitely onto something in her wariness of technology ­– in both the video and in some of her more recent articles she describes our inability to no longer have meaningful face-to-face conversations because we choose to be engrossed on our screens (phones/iPads/etc.) instead of in the person standing before us.

 

While I can think of a few instances where conversations have been interrupted by a friend’s quick peek at a phone, this issue doesn’t seem to be nearly as widespread as Turkle thinks. She seems to suggest that this is an epidemic taking over the country, based purely on interviews and some observations she has made (for instance, mothers walking down the street pushing their children in strollers are now looking at their phones instead of talking with their kids – Turkle argues that these mothers must have been talking with their children before phones and portable technology came along, but this conclusion doesn’t seem particularly well-grounded in data.)

 

In fact, other researchers (and former colleagues of Turkle) have concluded that technology use actually brings us together and further connects us, far more than it drives us apart. Keith Hampton, a professor from Rutgers, studied homes in the late 90’s that received high-speed Internet. His finding suggested that this new technology seemed to further connect the houses’ inhabitants rather than isolate them. In a more recent study, he also video-taped four major public spaces in the Northeast (the steps of the Met Museum and Bryant Park in New York, Downtown Crossing in Boston, and Chestnut Street in Philadelphia) to observe whether members of groups in public used their phones, instead of talking and interacting with others. When reviewing his footage, he noted that the percentage of people using their phones was quite low (only three to ten percent, far less prevalent than Turkle suggests in her research) and that the people using phones were usually alone. People in groups tended not to be using their phones while spending time with each other, and he concludes that mobile phone usage does not negatively contribute to our social interactions to the extent many suspect.

 

I think it’s interesting to explore the back-and-forth of opinions on whether phones and other communicative technologies help to bring us together or act to drive us apart. We should be mindful of technology’s role in our daily interactions but perhaps not as skeptical as Turkle suggests.

2 Comments

  1. Mike Smith

    November 24, 2016 @ 6:31 pm

    1

    I tend to agree with you. There are valid things that Turkle raises, but I also think she often takes the concerns too far. In my experience, our devices definitely keep us connected to those with whom we are already close (e.g., our families and close friends). When I went to college (in the dark ages), I hardly ever spoke with my parents. Today I don’t talk to my older kids every day, but much more than I ever spoke with my parents when I was their ages.

    On the other hand, I’m amazed when I walk by the Starbucks near my house. I never see anyone in there talking to others. Everyone is glued to their little screens. So, I think that these devices make it harder for us to meet those we don’t know in places where we used to meet strangers (e.g., the coffee shop).

  2. Jim Waldo

    November 24, 2016 @ 8:32 pm

    2

    Some of this depends on what is meant by “connecting” or “communicating”. The people madly texting or emailing on their phones are connecting and communicating, but not with the people they seem to be (physically) with. I think a more interesting notion is how much of our attention is placed with those that we are with, rather than with those with whom we are only connected electronically.

    There are discussions among faculty about this– should the use of electronics be limited in class? I have seen students playing on-line games during class discussions, and they are certainly not attending to the class. But I don’t outlaw the use of electronic devices in my classes. If I can’t be more interesting than something on-line, well, I guess that is my problem.

    These changes are interesting to watch as they happen. But knowing where they are going is always difficult…

Leave a Comment

Log in