message to Mississippi Access Com’n: “think self-help”
The Supreme Court of Mississippi has issued an Order Establishing The Mississippi Access to Justice Commission (via HALT eJournal, Aug. 28, 2006). According to the Court’s press release (June 29, 2006), the Commission is “comprised of business and community leaders, clergy and representatives from all three branches of government,” and it will seek to “develop a unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
2. Develop viable and effective plans, to establish or increase public funding and support for civil legal services for individuals and families who have no meaningful access to the justice system; and
3. Expand the types of assistance available to self-represented litigants, including exploring the role of non-attorneys.
Although the Mississippi Order repeats the language of the first two goals of Resolution 23 within its list of Access Commission tasks and powers, the third goal of Resolution 23 — to “Expand the types of assistance available to self-represented litigants” — is nowhere mentioned in the much-longer Mississippi list. Moreover, a look at the Mississippi Bar Association website reveals no commitment of resources for self-help programs, although there are significant pro bono efforts to help the poor. [The page listing very basic Law You Can Use articles advises that “To know more about your own specific situations, consult your attorney for legal guidance.” Also, the Bar’s volunteer telephone Legal Line gives “free legal information” to the public, but “If legal representation is needed the caller is urged to contact a private attorney or, if the caller feels they cannot afford an attorney, they are referred to the appropriate governmental agency for assistance.”]
As Your Editor stated at ethicalEsq in 2004, there is no solution to the access gap for low- and middle-income consumers that does not embrace the significant use of self-help information, technology and facilitation, especially through court-related programs — both online and on site. (See, e.g., Richard Zorza‘s paper on Client Needs and Potential, 2000). We hope we’re reading the mandate and focus of the Mississippi Access Commission incorrectly — and that the “changing landscape” described by Paula Hannaford Agar in her report Helping the Pro Se Litigant: A Changing Landscape, will soon include Mississippi. Agar asserts:
“In recognition of the reality of litigants’ needs, the courts and the legal community have slowly shifted from insistence on full-representation for every litigant as a fundamental requirement of equal justice to a more pragmatic approach, offering information and limited counsel for those litigants who are capable of managing their own cases and reserving full-representation for those with more complex cases or fewer personal resources.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Mississippi’s Access Committee can bring about the needed shift in attitude heralded in “Changing Landscape,” if it embraces the concept of facilitated self-help, and makes it an integral part of its “unified strategy to improve access to justice for the poor.”
Stephen Francoeur
October 1, 2006 @ 2:05 pm
Your post included my name among a list of law librarians who blog. I think you may have me confused with Steven Cohen, who is a law librarian and who blogs at http://www.librarystuff.net/
I am, by the way, a librarian who blogs, but I work at a college library in New York City.