Filed under: metrics
Everyone seems to think that developing tools around people’s daily
lives, on cleverly-designed platforms, is the Answer to lots of things
– the next iPod/computer/phone, new PCs for people in China’s urban
households, etc.
It doesn’t sound terribly innovative to me; am I just a stick in the
mud? How can anyone get excited about a PC-like platform when
there’s some real innovation being done for $100 PCs that torally
rethinks many layers in the development and distribution of
computing? Not that I think the $100 PC is the be-all or end-all
of what target consumers really need… I’m foolish enough to
think that most things that end-users really need doesn’t get developed
at all. A completely silly suggestion, I know.