Thursday July 02nd 2009, 7:03 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized
Filed under: Uncategorized
Openly peer-reviewed journals would never be able to mislead the way Elsevier can. And there would be no slipspace for them to be tempted to misbehave.
Publicly authored works, with public drafts showing the stages of development (appropriate for anything but creative art, where the illusion is part of the package, don’t you think?), would never be able to imply original research and fact-checking the way Chris Anderson can.
0 Comments
No Comments so far
Leave a comment
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>