11 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Recent Posts
- New “About” on my blog
- My review of California Design, 1930-1965
- Did anyone notice that there was no Sunday Links Post?
- Blogging has changed for me. A lot. But maybe not enough.
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
- The Sunday Diigo Links Post (weekly)
Archives
- November 2017
- April 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
Topics
- 2010_olympics
- addiction
- advertising
- affordable_housing
- architecture
- arts
- authenticity
- berlin
- black_press
- brutalism
- business
- canada
- cities
- comments
- community_associations
- conference
- copywrong
- creativity
- crime
- danah_boyd
- DemoCampVictoria
- democampvictoria01
- democampvictoria02
- dying_downtown
- education
- fashionable_life
- fastcompany
- FOCUS_Magazine
- free_press
- futurismo
- green
- guerilla_politics
- harvard
- health
- heritage
- homelessness
- housekeeping
- housing
- ideas
- innovation
- jane_jacobs
- johnson street bridge
- justice
- just_so
- land_use
- leadership
- links
- literature
- local_not_global
- mark_zuckerberg
- media
- MySpace
- nature
- newspapers
- NIMBYism
- northernvoice
- notes
- nv08
- offspring
- philanthropy
- politics
- Portland
- power_grid
- public_relations
- real_estate
- resources
- scandal
- scenes_victoria
- seattle
- silo_think
- social_critique
- social_networking
- sprawl
- Stalin_style
- street_life
- style
- taxes
- times_colonist
- transportation
- ubiquity
- Uncategorized
- urbanism
- us_elections
- vancouver
- vancouver_island
- victoria
- virtually
- web
- wiki
- wiki_victoria
- women
- writing
- yulelogStories
I noticed this yesterday. Something wrong with Radio?
Comment by Shelley — January 21, 2004 #
Ah, excellent, comments are back. Doug and Shelley and Joel and Maria commented on “Got Daughters.” If you want, put your comment here or try again on “Got Daughters.” (I know they commented because this program has the nifty feature of sending me comments via email. So, even if you comment on something from months ago, I’ll be able to read your comment since it lands directly in my email inbox. I don’t know if it’s standard with all blog software, but it’s a very good feature.)
Anyway, back on track. Now it’s just me who has to get out of funkland and get moving!
Comment by Yule Heibel — January 21, 2004 #
Weird. It still does not let me post to Got Daughters.
Comment by Joel — January 21, 2004 #
My Got Daughters comment: I recently picked up a book about Ancient Greek athletries — female athletes — who competed in a separate games at the Olympics and elsewhere. Women could own horses and received credit for races run in the male games. They ran their own races, wearing loose-fitting robes that left one breast bare and probably didn’t have good coverage of the area around the hips.
There’s also the story of a woman who sneaked into the male-only games despite the death penalty for doing so. She revealed herself
when her son won. The spectators took it in good humor and the official judges decided to commute the sentence to a hearty laugh according to accounts.
Check out the link to the article about Bonnie L. Basler under The Klansman Gravity Problem on my blog. It’s strange to think of Scientific American as a magazine that sells women as bodies, but there you have it.
Comment by Joel — January 21, 2004 #
thanks, Joel. Today I heard another interesting interview, this one with Waneek Horn-Miller, the Canadian Olympic water polo champion who posed for Time Magazine wearing nothing but a feather and holding a water polo ball (the feather because she’s Mohawk and an activist for her community. Her explanation for what she did in showing off her naked (?, it was Time Magazine, so I don’t think it was baring all) body was so compelling, but it came from a different position. She was owning her body, showing off its power. Her mother (and she agreed) told her it was imperative not to smile, not to make it into cheesecake with the appealing smile. She said she weighed 160 lbs in the photo, much of it muscle and pure strength. The difference? Pride, but not titillation. Self-ownership, not merchandising.
It’s a complex issue, but even though Laura Robinson has gotten a lot of flack for her book, I see her points very clearly, and I don’t think they’re at all incompatible with what Horn-Miller did, and Horn-Miller’s pose is completely different from the Nordic team’s nude calendar, too. Interesting issue, at any rate.
Comment by Yule Heibel — January 22, 2004 #
My radio listening typically happens when I have doctors’ appointments to drive to. Haven’t been sick, but it seems everyone is due for checkups, and that means I actually get to listen to good stuff occasionally…
Comment by Yule Heibel — January 22, 2004 #
I’m still trying to figure out what Bonnie Basler was trying to convey in that Scientific American shot.
As for smiles, I think we can make a distinction between what is provoked by commercialism and what is sincere.
What do you make of Degas “Olympia”?
Comment by Joel — January 22, 2004 #
Manet’s Olympia is absolutely a touchstone. Some of the best stuff written about it is in T.J. Clark’s book, The Painting of Modern Life. But incidentally, I just referred to Olympia on Shelley’s blog.
Comment by Yule Heibel — January 22, 2004 #
My head hangs with shame. It’s the hour. I like the piece Manet did the following year using the same model but wearing a dress that covered all of her body except for the face and hands.
Comment by Joel — January 22, 2004 #
Incidentally, we have a book called Impressionist Cats, showing felines in various scenes made famous by the impressionists. “Olympia” is a beige Siamese accompanied, of course, by a black cat in full dress.
There’s something about the picture that makes me laugh but at the same time get at the real point of “Olympia”. Though my cats run around in the buff all the time, this cat looks distinctly naked.
Comment by Joel — January 22, 2004 #
Well I can read em here Yule at 13:41 CET on 22/1/4.
And the success of this attempt to write here too, we shall see.
Stu
Comment by Stu Savory — January 22, 2004 #