This is the weirdest fashion thing I ever saw…
March 31, 2007 at 1:09 am | In fashionable_life | 5 CommentsI think I must be getting old or something, or else maybe it’s Carneval…
Ok, I don’t know what to say. Must be the hair down my throat…
Click on the link:
The Hole – video powered by Metacafe
What is on his chest, though?
(via Diane, A Shaded View on Fashion, via Regine.)
5 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
- 2010_olympics (rss) (3)
- addiction (rss) (6)
- advertising (rss) (8)
- affordable_housing (rss) (11)
- architecture (rss) (66)
- arts (rss) (63)
- authenticity (rss) (34)
- berlin (rss) (1)
- black_press (rss) (3)
- brutalism (rss) (2)
- business (rss) (34)
- canada (rss) (31)
- cities (rss) (101)
- comments (rss) (25)
- community_associations (rss) (3)
- conference (rss) (4)
- copywrong (rss) (4)
- creativity (rss) (23)
- crime (rss) (6)
- danah_boyd (rss) (2)
- DemoCampVictoria (rss) (11)
- democampvictoria01 (rss) (6)
- democampvictoria02 (rss) (2)
- dying_downtown (rss) (4)
- education (rss) (17)
- facebook (rss) (10)
- fashionable_life (rss) (24)
- fastcompany (rss) (5)
- FOCUS_Magazine (rss) (27)
- free_press (rss) (13)
- futurismo (rss) (14)
- green (rss) (32)
- guerilla_politics (rss) (15)
- harvard (rss) (2)
- health (rss) (29)
- heritage (rss) (21)
- homelessness (rss) (12)
- housekeeping (rss) (34)
- housing (rss) (14)
- ideas (rss) (102)
- innovation (rss) (51)
- jane_jacobs (rss) (10)
- johnson street bridge (rss) (37)
- justice (rss) (12)
- just_so (rss) (134)
- land_use (rss) (43)
- leadership (rss) (27)
- links (rss) (329)
- literature (rss) (2)
- local_not_global (rss) (45)
- mark_zuckerberg (rss) (1)
- media (rss) (42)
- MySpace (rss) (2)
- nature (rss) (8)
- newspapers (rss) (20)
- NIMBYism (rss) (10)
- northernvoice (rss) (8)
- notes (rss) (10)
- nv08 (rss) (2)
- offspring (rss) (3)
- philanthropy (rss) (3)
- politics (rss) (59)
- Portland (rss) (5)
- power_grid (rss) (4)
- public_relations (rss) (3)
- real_estate (rss) (12)
- resources (rss) (10)
- scandal (rss) (12)
- scenes_victoria (rss) (32)
- seattle (rss) (1)
- silo_think (rss) (5)
- social_critique (rss) (70)
- social_networking (rss) (19)
- sprawl (rss) (7)
- Stalin_style (rss) (1)
- street_life (rss) (10)
- style (rss) (5)
- taxes (rss) (6)
- times_colonist (rss) (12)
- transportation (rss) (6)
- ubiquity (rss) (4)
- Uncategorized (rss) (11)
- urbanism (rss) (60)
- us_elections (rss) (1)
- vancouver (rss) (14)
- vancouver_island (rss) (8)
- victoria (rss) (184)
- virtually (rss) (7)
- web (rss) (43)
- wiki (rss) (1)
- wiki_victoria (rss) (8)
- women (rss) (7)
- writing (rss) (58)
- yulelogStories (rss) (673)
- November 2017 (1)
- April 2014 (1)
- February 2014 (5)
- January 2014 (3)
- December 2013 (6)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (1)
- September 2013 (1)
- March 2013 (2)
- February 2013 (4)
- January 2013 (5)
- December 2012 (4)
- November 2012 (7)
- October 2012 (3)
- August 2012 (4)
- July 2012 (4)
- June 2012 (4)
- May 2012 (5)
- April 2012 (7)
- March 2012 (4)
- February 2012 (4)
- January 2012 (9)
- December 2011 (10)
- November 2011 (6)
- October 2011 (9)
- September 2011 (8)
- August 2011 (10)
- July 2011 (7)
- June 2011 (7)
- May 2011 (12)
- April 2011 (5)
- March 2011 (14)
- February 2011 (7)
- January 2011 (11)
- December 2010 (15)
- November 2010 (13)
- October 2010 (19)
- September 2010 (26)
- August 2010 (30)
- July 2010 (32)
- June 2010 (30)
- May 2010 (31)
- April 2010 (30)
- March 2010 (31)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (5)
- December 2009 (7)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (4)
- September 2009 (3)
- August 2009 (10)
- July 2009 (12)
- June 2009 (14)
- May 2009 (12)
- April 2009 (14)
- March 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (15)
- January 2009 (16)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (19)
- September 2008 (7)
- August 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (23)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (34)
- April 2008 (20)
- March 2008 (19)
- February 2008 (28)
- January 2008 (26)
- December 2007 (21)
- November 2007 (17)
- October 2007 (15)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (10)
- July 2007 (10)
- June 2007 (8)
- May 2007 (6)
- April 2007 (10)
- March 2007 (4)
- February 2007 (10)
- January 2007 (6)
- December 2006 (8)
- November 2006 (3)
- October 2006 (3)
- September 2006 (5)
- August 2006 (5)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (2)
- February 2006 (12)
- January 2006 (14)
- December 2005 (11)
- November 2005 (12)
- October 2005 (13)
- September 2005 (20)
- July 2005 (29)
- June 2005 (16)
- May 2005 (12)
- April 2005 (9)
- March 2005 (14)
- February 2005 (14)
- January 2005 (20)
- December 2004 (12)
- November 2004 (17)
- October 2004 (12)
- September 2004 (15)
- August 2004 (6)
- July 2004 (8)
- June 2004 (1)
- May 2004 (15)
- April 2004 (18)
- March 2004 (19)
- February 2004 (20)
- January 2004 (20)
- December 2003 (24)
- November 2003 (30)
- October 2003 (33)
- September 2003 (32)
- August 2003 (39)
- July 2003 (36)
- June 2003 (27)
- May 2003 (38)
- April 2003 (39)
- March 2003 (2)
Categories:
Archives:
Blogroll
Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
You and me both…. feeling old that is! At first, I thought this was a skit from Saturday Night Live. Oh well.
Comment by maria — March 31, 2007 #
And how about the maestro’s bon mot, spoken without irony, that it’s not what’s on the inside that matters, but what’s on the outside?
The son came up with an interesting insight. He noticed that the guy considers himself an artist and that he treat his work as art. But his “canvas” is the models, so he is in fact objectifying people, and he thinks this is great. The stylist’s comments were therefore among the clearer expressions of how people are objectified by the fashion industry — even (or especially?) when it’s producing art.
Maybe that’s a yardstick for measuring the difference between fashion and art?
Comment by yulelog — March 31, 2007 #
That is an important distinction between fashion and art. I guess my definition would have been fuzzier and along the lines of an artist objectifying his/her ideas, while fashion, clearly, objectifying people for the sake of style. In other words, an artist would create an object to express the shape of an idea, while the fashion stylist would find the object (his or her material being people) to fit or contain the style, which is more important — or of a higher order in the hierarchy than the “material” capable of expressing it.
Oh well, I am not sure what I am talking about, but the video was worth watching. Good find!
Comment by maria — March 31, 2007 #
There are quite a number of avenues to explore here… It’s interesting.
For example, the basis in religious or superstitious thinking for both art & fashion. Body modification is the basis of culture in many ways — and therefore for religion, insofar as religion is a way of staking out a human arena amidst nature. Body modifications say, “I am not-nature, I am culture.” Piercings, scarifications, all that sort of stuff, along with the temporary ones of painting or masking — they all say, “I (we) am (are) distinguishing / separating / marking / identifying, even!…” And the thing that’s identified with or, by distinguished from, taken in favour, is usually something “superior,” better, dare I say it?, …more stylish.
But it has its beginnings in religiously inspired reveries.
Another avenue: If I “fashion” myself, am I objectifying myself? Possibly. But is that my “right”? Probably. If a hair stylist who decides that he’s an artist objectifies me by using me as his living canvas, is that objectification different, qualitatively speaking? At first blush, I’d argue yes. But then we have to start talking about how to measure objectification.
This is fun, innit? 😉
If a religion objectifies a whole community, by asking it to wear certain clothes according to gender, what kind of objectification is that? Is it any better or worse than having hair extension on your pubic hair, and styling it to look like peacock feathers, given that it’s not you doing this, but the “artist” (the stylist-visionary), whose “canvas” you have willingly become? Are you a peacock for Allah if you wear a burqah, or for Jesus if you wear a cross?
What’s objectification, anyway? And, while we’ve known about art’s role in religion on a superficial & on a deeper level, what’s the connection between fashion and religion?
Comment by yulelog — April 1, 2007 #
That is strange! well well these things sometimes show up at http://www.feedshion.com aswell, but it’s mostly normal stuff even we older ppl can like.
Comment by Angela — April 7, 2007 #