Clinical and Pro Bono Programs

Providing clinical and pro bono opportunities to Harvard Law School students

Author: ispaho (page 4 of 19)

Blake Strode leaves Harvard Law for Arch City Defenders

Blake Strode, J.D. '15

Blake Strode, J.D. ’15

Via the St. Louis American 

As a student at Harvard Law School, native St. Louisan and former tennis pro Blake Strode would often spend his weekends in Boston knocking on the doors of recently foreclosed homeowners.

Sometimes the families wouldn’t even know their houses were in foreclosure, said Strode, who graduated with honors in May.

“We’d ensure them that they have a lot of legal rights,” he said, speaking of his work of Project No One Leaves, a student practice organization, “and try to help them weather the storm of foreclosure.”

Before Ferguson exploded in the fall, Strode said he might have pursued a career in Washington, D.C., where he had worked the past two summers – including an internship with the Department of Justice in the civil rights division’s voting section. However, the police brutality cases in Ferguson, Cleveland and Baltimore became a “defining theme” for many of his classmates, he said, and they spent their last year in law school holding “die-ins” and questioning the legal system.

“For a lot of students, it changed our focus, and it changed the kind of work that was being done by students,” he said. “It changed our conception of justice so that people saw the legal imperfections in lot of ways – which is huge and the first step in creating change. That’s what’s happening in St. Louis.”

Strode has decided to return to St. Louis to work with the Arch City Defenders, the nonprofit that has pushed for systematic reform of municipal courts in Missouri. Strode said there’s a lot of energy focused on building a more equitable region in his hometown, and he wants to be part of “harnessing” that energy towards helping marginalized residents. That’s one of the things that drew him to Arch City Defenders, he said. The nonprofit provides legal aid to such residents, including homeless, battered spouses, veterans and low-income residents.

“Arch City is a good example of an organization that is giving people a means to have a voice in our legal system,” Strode said, “and working to protect and preserve the laws that currently exist while fighting to expand those rights.”

Continue reading the full story here.

CHLPI launches a campaign to promote federal law and policy reforms for type 2 diabetes

CHLPI PATHS Beating Type 2 Diabetes Recommendations reportVia HLS News

As a direct response to the looming health epidemic, the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (CHLPI) officially launched a campaign to promote federal law and policy reforms for type 2 diabetes prevention and management on May 19. This effort is part of CHLPI’s broader, multi-phase Providing Access to Healthy Solutions (PATHS) initiative that first worked to strengthen local and state policy to address diet-related health conditions and more specifically improve type 2 diabetes treatment and prevention. PATHS is now focusing on federal law and policy reform.

The Federal Report, written by CHLPI staff and the clinic students, offers specific recommendations to decrease the incidence of type 2 diabetes and to promote effective management of the disease in those who have already been diagnosed. Beating Type 2 Diabetes: Recommendations for Federal Policy Reform builds off of the best-practices identified through years of work at the state and local level and the guidance of people living with and at-risk-for diabetes, health and social service professionals, food providers and producers, government officials and other stakeholders,” says Robert Greenwald, Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Director of its Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation (CHLPI).

Continue reading the full story here.

Emily Broad Leib named Assistant Clinical Professor of Law

Emily Broad Leib, Food Law and Policy Clinic

Emily Broad Leib
Food Law and Policy Clinic

Via HLS News

Emily Broad Leib ’08, cofounder and director of Harvard Law School’s Food Law and Policy Clinic, has been named Assistant Clinical Professor of Law at HLS.

Broad Leib has worked at the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, of which the Food Law and Policy Clinic is a part, since 2010. She founded the Food Law and Policy Clinic in 2011, and in 2013 was appointed Deputy Director of the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation.

“In a few short years, she has helped build the Food Law and Policy Clinic into the nation’s most innovative and influential clinic addressing complex problems surrounding the production, distribution, and safety of food and related issues of health and equity,” said Martha Minow, Dean of Harvard Law School.  “Emily’s passion, imagination, and strategic analysis have inspired students and faculty around the country.  We are so delighted she is joining Harvard Law School’s clinical faculty.”

Broad Leib is recognized as a national leader in Food Law and Policy. She teaches courses on the topic and focuses her scholarship and practice on finding solutions to today’s biggest food system issues, aiming to increase access to healthy foods, prevent diet-related disease, and reduce barriers to market entry for small-scale and sustainable food producers. She has published scholarly articles in the Wisconsin Law Review, the Harvard Law & Policy Review, and the Journal of Food Law & Policy, as well as in the Routledge International Handbook of Food Studies.

Continue reading the full story here.

Legal Services Center Launches Veterans Justice Pro Bono Partnership

Via the Legal Services Center 

On Tuesday, June 2, the Veterans Legal Clinic of the Legal Services Center launched the Veterans Justice Pro Bono Partnership. Through the program, the clinic will refer cases, offer trainings, and provide ongoing support to local attorneys who agree to provide pro bono representation to veterans discharged less-than-honorably in petitions to upgrade their discharge statuses. Having a less-than-honorable discharge can prevent a former servicemember from accessing care and treatment from the Department of Veterans Affairs and impede efforts toward stable employment, education, and housing.

The Partnership kicked off with a half-day training at the Boston Bar Association, where attorneys learned about military law and culture, the review boards, and service-related medical diagnoses and treatment, among other topics. In addition to Veterans Legal Clinic attorneys Daniel Nagin, Betsy Gwin, and Dana Montalto, presenters included Susan Lynch, an attorney and Major in the Judge Advocate General Corps of the U.S. Army Reserves, and Dr. Sandra Dixon, a core faculty member of William James College who teaches about trauma and meeting the needs of returning veterans. In attendance were more than two dozen attorneys, including solo practitioners, public-interest lawyers, and members of some of Boston’s leading law firms.

Hundreds of thousands of servicemembers were separated with less-than-fully-Honorable discharges in the past decades, including more than 200,000 in the Post-9/11 Era. Despite the availability of a legal remedy and a demand for legal assistance, very few attorneys offer representation to former servicemembers before the records correction boards and even fewer provide pro bono representation to low-income veterans. The mission of the Veterans Justice Pro Bono Partnership is to close that gap by providing attorneys interested in assisting those who have worn the uniform with the skills and resources necessary to represent them.

Attorneys who are interested in joining the Veterans Justice Pro Bono Partnership should contact Dana Montalto at dmontalto [at] law.harvard.edu.

Clinic Submits Comments on Proposed Regulations for Offshore Drilling in the Arctic

Via Emmett Environmental Law and Policy Clinic 

The Emmett Environmental Law & Policy Clinic submitted comments today on the Department of the Interior’s (“DOI”) proposed regulations for offshore exploratory oil drilling in the Arctic.  The Emmett Clinic supported the agency’s proposals to require that operators maintain a secondary drill rig in the Arctic to respond to potential losses of well control and that operators have prompt access to, and immediately deploy, source control and containment equipment in the event of an oil spill.

The Clinic also identified areas in which the proposal could be improved.  In particular, the Clinic criticized DOI’s reliance on a performance-based standard for the secondary drill rig requirement.  The Clinic proposed that the regulations should instead mandate that a relief rig always be available within a minimum distance from the drill site, while still including a performance-based standard as a backstop.  In addition, the Clinic suggested several ways that the regulations could be changed to improve public access to information and provide better opportunities for public participation in the regulatory process.

The comments were part of the Emmett Clinic’s on-going focus on the impacts of offshore drilling, especially in the Arctic.  Previous Emmett Clinic offshore drilling work is available here.

Clinic student James Zhu, JD ’16, took the leading role in drafting the comments.  Abhishek Banerjee-Shukla, JD ’15, and Pradeep Singh, LLM ’15 also contributed to them.  The students worked under the supervision of Clinic Director Wendy Jacobs and Senior Clinical Instructor Shaun Goho.

DOJ Releases Patriot Act Report following Clinic FOIA Request

CaptureVia the Cyberlaw Clinic 

The Cyberlaw Clinic is pleased to report that earlier today the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General released its internal audit of the FBI’s use of Section 215 of the Patriot Act from 2007–2009. Release of the Inspector General report comes soon after the Clinic prepared a FOIA request seeking a copy of the report, on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Security Project.

Section 215 of the Patriot Act allows the government to obtain orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain “tangible things” as part of investigations into foreign intelligence or terrorism. This section has come under intense scrutiny after the revelation by Edward Snowden that the government was using Section 215 to gather records related to every call made on networks operated by Verizon Business Network Services, as well as those of other phone companies. Section 215 is set to expire on June 1, and is currently the subject of vigorous national debate as Congress contemplates whether to reauthorize this surveillance authority.

The report released today is the third addressing the FBI’s use of Section 215, after Congress mandated the DOJ to such periodic reviews under the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005. Earlier reports reviewed the FBI’s use from 2002 through 2005 and for 2006. As the FOIA request prepared by the Clinic notes, this report “will no doubt be one of the most important public documents used in this debate; it is vitally needed to inform the ongoing public debate about whether the provision should be reenacted, and with what amendments.”

Clinic students Naomi Gilens (’16) and Gabrielle Hodgson (’15) worked on this request, along with Clinical Fellow Andy Sellars, Clinical Instructor Vivek Krishnamurthy, and Patrick Toomey, a staff attorney at the ACLU’s National Security Project.

Chad Baker ’15 wins Kaufman Pro Bono Award

Chad Baker, J.D. '15

Credit: Lorin Granger

Chad Baker ’15 received the Andrew L. Kaufman Pro Bono Service Award for exemplifying the pro bono public spirit and demonstrating an extraordinary commitment to improving and delivering high quality volunteer legal services to disadvantaged communities. The award is granted each year in honor of Professor Andrew Kaufman, who has been instrumental in creating and supporting the Pro Bono Program at Harvard Law School.

During his time at HLS, Chad has been an inspiring leader. He has contributed thousands of pro bono hours by working with the Tenant Advocacy Project, Prison Legal Assistance Project, and the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau (HLAB).

Chad was an excellent Executive Director of HLAB, “not only because he ran the office with strength and compassion, but because he continued taking hard cases while doing it,” said Clinical Professor of Law Esme Caramello who supervised him. “He also played a crucial role in setting the tone in the community, keeping us all focused on HLAB’s anti-poverty mission and ensuring that everyone here was constantly looking critically at their work and asking whether they were serving the right goals in the right way. Chad was much more than a functionary; he was a leader whose dedication and vision inspired everyone here to do more work, better and more thoughtfully.”

Chad’s client work has also been extraordinary. His Clinical Instructor, Patricia Whiting said “Chad demonstrated research and writing skills that I can honestly categorize as exemplary. During his two years at the Bureau, Chad researched and drafted a wide variety of documents: from pleadings and correspondence to an opposition to the landlord’s motion for summary judgment on behalf of a disabled client being evicted from public housing.” Chad’s work made a significant impact in his client’s life and is only one example of his commitment to helping people.

“[He] has been the heart and soul of the Harvard Legal Aid Bureau,” said Whiting. “He has done extraordinary work as a student attorney in all of our practice areas, and has quietly made the Bureau a better legal services organization as well as a richer community.”

As an example, Chad helped revitalize HLAB’s Social Security disability practice by recruiting students to take disability cases, creating and running a streamlined investigation and intake system, and developing an enormous and resource-rich internal wiki containing all of the materials a Bureau student could need to handle a first disability law case.

“I’m so honored to receive the Kaufman award,” said Chad. “I’ve been tremendously grateful for the ample student practice opportunities at HLS. Student practice organizations and HLAB gave me the chance to learn real lawyering skills from talented colleagues and supervisors while serving marginalized communities.”

Next year Chad is going to Chicago to work with Bureau alum and 2008 winner of Kaufman Pro Bono Award Lam Ho, in his new community lawyering startup, Community Activism Law Alliance.

Two Win 2015 Exemplary Clinical Student Award

Harvard Law School’s Office of Clinical and Pro Bono Programs recognizes two graduating students who exemplify putting theory into practice through clinical work. The honorees are Seth Hoedl ’15 and Seth Packrone ’15. They have demonstrated excellence in representing individual clients and undertaking advocacy or policy reform projects. In addition, both students are recognized for demonstrating thoughtfulness and compassion in their practice and for contributing to the clinical community at HLS in a meaningful way.

Seth Hoedl, J.D. ’15

Seth Hoedl (Clinical Award)

Credit: Lorin Granger

As a student in the Emmett Environmental Law and Policy Clinic, Seth Hoedl demonstrated exceptional skills and experience in tackling significant environmental problems. During his four semesters in the clinic, he examined whether a European nation was in violation of the Espoo Convention, developed a legal strategy to help the City of Boston provide energy resilience to its residents through microgrids, and identified new ways that universities and others can decrease and offset their greenhouse gas emissions.

“In each project, Seth demonstrated a level of commitment, initiative, and ability far beyond a typical law student,” said Clinical Professor of Law Wendy Jacobs. “Seth has also contributed to the clinic through his self-reflection and team spirit. In particular, his self-assessments have always been thoughtful and considered. Both through these and through other conversations, Seth has suggested concrete ways that we can improve the clinic and the learning experience for all students.”

“I am originally trained as a physicist and I came to law school to bridge divides between scientists, engineers, lawyers and policymakers with regards to energy and climate change,” said Seth. The clinic enabled me to start building these bridges and help both engineers and lawyers overcome real world challenges before I even graduated. It far exceeded my expectations.”

Seth Packrone, J.D. ’15 

Seth Packrone (Clinical Award)

Credit: Lorin Granger

Seth Packrone spent several semesters in the Clinical and Pro Bono Programs working with the Child Advocacy Clinic, Criminal Justice Institute (CJI), Education Law Clinic, and Mississippi Delta Project. “Seth is the rare combination of hard work, integrity and compassion,” said Clinical Professor of Law Dehlia Umunna who supervised him in the Criminal Justice Institute.

Seth joined CJI in the fall of 2014 and worked on a variety of cases in juvenile and adult court. He represented several clients, including a 55 year old man with mental health and substance abuse issues. Seth visited this client at the jail, arranged for social services to aid with his transition back into the community, and successfully resolved all of his cases.

“Seth has received glowing compliments from judges, prosecutors, other defense counsel and his colleagues,” said Dehlia. “In addition to the brilliant job he did on his cases, he is a kind, helpful member of the clinical community. He is always eager to assist his colleagues with investigating, brainstorming, trial preparation and research. Although he had one of the highest case loads, he never murmured or complained. Seth represents the very best of what a clinical student should be.”

“My clinical work has been the most meaningful part of my time at HLS. I will always be thankful for my experiences working with such incredible clients, students, faculty, and staff and everything they taught me about the important work that public interest lawyers do,” said Seth. “I am truly honored by this award.”

Christopher Melendez ’15 Wins CLEA’s Outstanding Clinical Student Award

Dean Martha Minow (center left) and students who are part of Harvard Law School’s Veterans Legal Clinic spoke with judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Christopher Melendez, J.D. ’15 (third from the right) with Dean Martha Minow (center left), judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, and students who were part of Harvard Law School’s Veterans Legal Clinic.

Congratulations to Christopher Melendez J.D. ’15, on winning the Outstanding Clinical Student Award from the Clinical Legal Education Association (CLEA). The award is presented annually to one student from each law school for his/her outstanding clinical coursework and contributions to the clinical community.

Chris was nominated by Clinical Professor of Law Daniel Nagin for his work with the Veterans Legal Clinic. Over the course of his three years at Harvard Law, Chris has logged hundreds of pro bono hours in service to the community and excelled as a clinical law student.

“I have had a fantastic experience working with the Veterans Legal Clinic,” said Chris. “Not only did I receive an immensely practical education, but I was also able to work with engaging clients and novel issues of law. Having left the Marine Corps to attend law school, the Veterans Legal Clinic also gave me the personal satisfaction of connecting with a broad community of Massachusetts veterans.”

Chris first joined the Clinic as a summer intern during his 1L year. He worked long hours crafting appellate briefs, representing clients, and interviewing new clients who contacted the Clinic. He then enrolled in the Veterans Legal Clinic as a 2L clinical student. During his first semester in the Clinic, along with student co-counsel, Chris briefed and argued a significant case before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. The case involved a question of first impression regarding whether the Court’s own filing deadline for commencing an appeal from an adverse VA decision could be extended because of a veteran’s difficulties readjusting to civilian life following a combat deployment.

“Chris spent day after day preparing for the argument and worked seamlessly with his fellow students on the team to consider the case from every angle,” said Nagin. In a precedential decision, Ausmer v. Shinseki, 26 Vet.App. 392 (2013), the Court ruled in favor of the veteran and for the first time applied the federal Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to the Court’s own filing deadline.  The decision not only allowed this individual veteran’s disability appeal to be heard on the merits, but protects the appellate rights of other veterans who have service-connected disabilities and experienced multiple deployments.

“Together with his fellow students on the team, it was Chris’ determination, creativity, smarts, and grit that helped bring justice to this veteran and many other veterans who will benefit from the Court’s decision,” said Dan Nagin.

“Arguing Ausmer v. Shinseki  was the highlight of my experience at HLS,” said Chris. “I met esteemed judges, set precedent and was able to see the case through to a successful remand to the VA. Because of this experience, I can head into professional life fully prepared to conduct veterans advocacy throughout the VA appeals process.”

“I am also leaving HLS with a deep sense of the problems—and achievements—of the VA as well as the place that intelligently directed advocacy can play in its reform.”

Chris’s contributions to the Clinic were not confined to a single case.  He returned to the Clinic as a continuing student and worked on countless veterans’ cases involving a range of legal issues. Among other things, he represented disabled veterans in estate planning matters, including drafting a sophisticated trust instrument to help protect the limited assets of one client facing serious health issues. Chris also helped mentor new clinic students. Even after completing his clinic semester, his dedication found new outlets. He helped the Clinic staff the legal assistance tent at Massachusetts Stand Down, a day-long summer event to link homeless and at-risk veterans to services. After graduation, Chris will join the Boston office of the international law firm Morgan Lewis.

Reflections from the Child Advocacy Clinic

Students in the Child Advocacy Clinic learn about a variety of substantive areas impacting the lives of children, particularly by focusing on child welfare (abuse and neglect, foster care, and adoption), education, and juvenile justice. Through a wide range of field placements with government agencies and organizations throughout the U.S. and other countries, students work on different types of projects such as drafting memoranda and briefs for litigation; developing legislative reform proposals; analyzing social science and psychological research; and providing strategic advice to start-ups. We asked students to share their thoughts about working with the Child Advocacy Clinic. Please read their reflections below.

Lydia Halpern, 3L
“The Child Advocacy Clinic was the perfect capstone to my law school career. Interning at the Middlesex Juvenile Court I was able to put three years of doctrinal knowledge in a wide variety of legal fields to use. Aside from the obvious—Civil Procedure, Evidence—I wrote memos and worked on cases involving Immigration Law, First Amendment Law, Constitutional Law, and Family Law. More so than any other job or clinical placement I’ve had during my time at Harvard Law, this clinic allowed me to put what I was learning in the classroom directly into practice. Spending 8 to 10 hours of every week in court gave me great insight into how the juvenile justice system actually works, and allowed me to connect with a wide variety of people who came from all over spectrum of the juvenile justice legal field.”

Faye Maison, 2L
“As a student in the Child Advocacy Clinic, I enjoyed the opportunity to have in depth discussions about everyone’s placements. Students in the CAP clinic worked at a variety of placements, but the placements were strikingly similar. It was amazing to see how interconnected the presentations were. We were constantly referring back to a comment or scenario someone brought up earlier in the semester that was still relevant to the current discussion. It showed how we can take on a variety of roles to combat and assist people in the same issue-area.”

Mark Hamlin, 2L
“Heading into my Child Advocacy Clinic placement site, a primary goal of mine was to find a way to continue to be involved in child advocacy after law school, even though I would almost certainly be heading into practice at a large law firm. The clinic more than met this goal. It not only showed me the diversity of backgrounds involved in the field of child advocacy, but the diversity of approaches and opportunities through which to become involved. I may not know specifically what my role will be in children’s advocacy post-law school, but I no longer am worried that by working at a large law firm I will be cutting myself off from this incredible community of advocates.

Beyond the realm of child advocacy, the clinic also offered me the most practical experience I have received in law school. My placement exposed me to brief and motion writing, witness interviewing and declaration preparation, client interaction, the dynamics of team collaboration and delegation, and the difficulty of actually getting your day in court. It was very refreshing to move away from the theory of law and towards practical application.”

Clinic student finds a meaningful experience in representing veterans

Kathleen Borschow, J.D. '15

Kathleen Borschow, J.D. ’15

By Kathleen Borschow, J.D. ’15

I wanted to be involved in clinical work as early into law school as possible, so I joined Harvard Law Student Advocates for Human Rights my 1L fall year. I was assigned to the International Human Rights Clinic’s Right to Heal Project, which sought to bring attention to and seek justice for veterans suffering from the “invisible wounds of war.” It was my first experience working on veterans’ issues, and I was deeply troubled. When it was time to enroll in a clinic my 2L year, the Veterans Legal Clinic was an easy choice.

Under the supervision of Clinical Professor of Law Daniel Nagin and Clinical Fellow Betsy Gwin, students in the clinic get to work on various types of cases. I helped veterans seeking a discharge upgrade, which can be crucial for eligibility to receive medical and educational benefits as well as basic employment. I guided them through the challenges in navigating the vast VA bureaucracy: requesting and waiting for records from various entities, submitting claims to remote decision makers, understanding the sometimes complex procedural posture of their claims, and waiting months—or years—for a decision. I also assisted an unemployed veteran appealing termination of Massachusetts’ public assistance program for indigent and disabled veterans. Although we were unable to represent him, I advised him on how better to advocate for himself in a system that seems unsympathetic and unfair to unrepresented claimants.

I spent half of my semester working on an appeal brief to the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims challenging a denial of VA disability benefits for post-traumatic stress as a result of military sexual trauma. One in three military women is sexually assaulted, and one in five women veterans will develop post-traumatic stress (PTS) as a result of military sexual trauma and other traumatic experiences while in service. Few of these women can successfully access the VA healthcare system, disability benefits, or educational loans to receive the assistance they so desperately need to rebuild their lives post-service. This leads tens of thousands of women veterans into poverty and homelessness—many are single mothers, and suicide rates are staggering.

As is all too common in cases of military sexual trauma, our client had not sought treatment or applied for benefits until decades after her separation from the military during the Vietnam Era. Working with Dan, Betsy, and two other clinical students, we appealed the Board of Veterans Appeals’ decision denying her claim. Our brief was wholly successful: opposing counsel did not file an opposition brief and instead made our client an excellent settlement offer. After decades of neglect by an unfair system, with our help, our client finally attained a measure of justice—and an opportunity for income assistance—she so needs and deserves. It was unquestionably my most meaningful experience in law school.

Harvard Mediation Program Presents at the ABA Section of Dispute Resolution Conference in Seattle

Front Row (L-R): Rachel Viscomi ‘01, Assistant Director of the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program; Prill Ellis, HMP Clinical Supervisor; Maureen (Mo) Griffin, HMP Program Manager Back Row (L-R): Sam Cortina ’15; Michael Moffit ‘94, Dean, University of Oregon School of Law; Nancy Welsh ’82, Professor of Law, Dickinson School of Law at Penn State; Erin Archerd ’08, Langdon Fellow in Dispute Resolution, Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University; Rishi Batra HLS ‘08, Assistant Professor of Law, Texas Tech University School of Law; John Miller, ‘15.

Front Row (L-R): Rachel Viscomi ‘01, Assistant Director of the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program; Prill Ellis, HMP Clinical Supervisor; Maureen (Mo) Griffin, HMP Program Manager. Back Row (L-R): Sam Cortina ’15; Michael Moffit ‘94, Dean, University of Oregon School of Law; Nancy Welsh ’82, Professor of Law, Dickinson School of Law at Penn State; Erin Archerd ’08, Langdon Fellow in Dispute Resolution, Moritz College of Law at The Ohio State University; Rishi Batra HLS ‘08, Assistant Professor of Law, Texas Tech University School of Law; John Miller, ‘15.

By Sam Cortina, J.D. ‘15

As a student in the Harvard Mediation Program (HMP), this spring semester I participated in the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution Spring Conference in Seattle. It was one of the most enriching academic and professional experiences of my life.

John Miller, J.D. ’15 and I moved from our roles as students to teachers when we discussed our rich experiences with high-conflict mediations on the HMP panel: Beyond Small Claims; New Venues for Mediation Programs. We shared with the audience HMP’s success in recently developing a mediation program for Harassment Prevention Orders in and around greater Boston, and also discussed the incredible work that HMP students, staff, and professors have done over the past 34 years!

It was exceptional to meet so many HMP alumni and learn how the program changed their lives. I feel we made a genuine contribution to the alternative dispute resolution community, and I know our efforts will assimilate into different programs throughout the country in a way that makes people’s lives better. For that, I am incredibly proud to call myself a lifelong member of HMP, and to have attended and contributed to the ABA’s Spring Conference.

A clinic student confronts the challenges of family and domestic violence law

KBoulton_pic

Kathryn Boulton, J.D. ’15

By Kathryn Boulton, J.D. ’15

Prior to joining the Family and Domestic Violence Law Clinic, I had virtually no direct services experience to speak of. Much of my work in other courses and clinics had focused on broad, policy-based questions of an international character, e.g., how to promote legal abortion reform in Burma or the status of sexual and gender minorities under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Women’s rights and health have always been at the forefront of my interests, and indeed what led me to pursue a law degree.

The clinic provided an incredibly valuable contact and also challenged my expectations and skills. My cases primarily concerned divorce and all of the difficult questions that it poses: custody, child support, division of marital debts and assets, etc. In practice, these questions are not simply about the interpretation of a legal standard or figuring out the most logical way to divide up a particular asset. Rather, at an individual level, addressing these questions means gaining a truly intimate picture of a client’s life and goals: medical records, tax returns, outstanding loans owed to a family member, the reason for selecting a particular child daycare. At the same time that you are building this highly textured portrait of her life, you remain attentive to the bigger-picture questions: What does she envision moving forward? Where can she accept compromise? Where is her position non-negotiable? Her goals and the way she approaches litigation will be informed by the history of a complex (and often abusive) relationship. As her student attorney, it was my job to truly understand these experiences and priorities, and to represent them as zealously and ably as I could.

Although I intend to return to policy advocacy post-graduation, the Family and Domestic Violence Law Clinic has been an invaluable experience. It exposed me to new ways of thinking about the connection between the law and individual women’s experiences, and I will always be grateful for the way my clients opened their lives to me.

Clinic students contribute almost 800 hours of legal research to Massachusetts Courts

By Hon. John C. Cratsley 

This spring semester, students in the Judicial Process in Community Courts Clinic and class provided almost 800 hours of volunteer legal research and writing time for their assigned judges. The 22 students in this year’s clinic and class exceed the contribution of last year’s students by almost 300 hours.

Students were placed with judges in six different trial courts – the Boston Municipal Court, District Court, Juvenile and Superior Court departments of the Massachusetts Trial Court and the U.S. District and Immigration Courts in the federal system. In addition, their weekly classes included discussions of highly relevant topics like mandatory sentences for drug crimes, alternative approaches to traditional sentencing, including treatment courts and restorative justice, as well as the unmet need for civil legal assistance in court proceedings and the work of the Center for Court Innovation in promoting model community courts.

The variety of student research and drafting for their judges is extensive ranging from motions to suppress in criminal cases to motions seeking judicial review of final decisions of state administrative agencies. Specific student work included memos on the application of a forum selection clause, the right of a criminal defendant to a new trial, and the role of the confrontation clause in deposition practice. This was also the first year our clinic was able to place a student in the Immigration Court, where her responsibilities included work on both asylum and citizenship issues.

Additionally, students assisted their state court judges with the implementation of two important changes, the first, a new statute authorizing for the first time in Massachusetts the use in jury selection of attorney conducted voire dire, and the second, a new rule from the Supreme Judicial Court regarding plea bargaining practices including judicial participation.

The students’ day to day work for their judges often finds its way into their final papers for their class. For example, several students chose to write about the new SJC Rule 12 and its likely impact of increased judicial involvement in plea bargaining.

Jonathan Hiles, J.D. '15

Jonathan Hiles, J.D. ’15

“As a practical matter, Massachusetts judges retain significant discretion in plea negotiations,” said Jonathan Hiles, J.D. ’15, who examined the ways in which judges can exercise this power, both generally and in the context of likely sentencing guidelines. “The new constraints highlight how much flexibility remains, in spite of the publicized split within the Supreme Judicial Court. The revised Rule 12 explicitly licenses judicial management of plea negotiations and increases confidence in them by setting basic rules of the road.”

Another student is analyzing the early results of attorney run voire dire as the law changes to permit it. With an emphasis in the class on writing papers relevant to those courts seeking to be responsive to community needs, three students are writing about the expansion of mental health courts; two evaluating a one year old mental health court and one writing a very practical paper to help her judge start a mental health court.

Kristen Molloy, J.D. '15

Kristen Molloy, J.D. ’15

Clinic student Kristen Molloy, J.D. ’15 commented that the “clinic was one of the most valuable and practical experiences” of her time at Harvard Law School. “The clinic offered a wonderful opportunity to observe the typically private juvenile court proceedings and get a better understanding of the types of cases that juvenile judges handle,” she said. “I enjoyed learning more about the juvenile court’s history and current reform initiatives.”

Susan Farbstein appointed Clinical Professor

Farbstein_Susan

Assistant Clinical Professor
Susan H. Farbstein ’04

Via HLS News

Susan Farbstein ’04 has been appointed Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Co-director of the International Human Rights Clinic, Farbstein has been an assistant clinical professor at HLS since 2012.

Farbstein’s current work focuses on Southern Africa, transitional justice, Alien Tort Statute litigation, community lawyering, and economic, social, and cultural rights. She is an expert on South Africa, having worked on a variety of human rights and transitional justice issues in that country for nearly 15 years. Her writing has been published in scholarly journals, including the Harvard Law Review and the Harvard International Law Journal, as well as The New York Times and SCOTUSBlog.

“Susan is a true leader in human rights and transitional justice, and she is also an amazing teacher,” said Martha Minow, Harvard Law School Dean. “Her innovative work spans social and economic rights in South Africa, transitional justice issues in Africa and Asia, and Alien Tort litigation in the United States. Susan’s devotion to students and tireless, imaginative work makes her an outstanding member of this community and the entire human rights community.”

Continue reading the full story here.

Hon. John C. Cratsley visits his former students in Korea

photo

Back Row (left to right) Tai Heon Ha, LL.M. ’12; Kim Chang Mo LL.M. ’11; Kim Min Soo, LL.M. ’14; Sung Jun Park, LL.M. ’11; and Sang-Jin Oh, LL.M. ’09, and in front row (left to right), Sung Chul Min LL.M. ’08; Hon. John C. Cratsley; and Hyun Nak Hee LL.M. ’13. Also present but missed the photo was Inyoung Cho LL.M. ’09.

Hon. John C. Cratsley, Lecturer on Law and Director of the Judicial Process in Community Courts Clinic is pictured above with Harvard Law School LL.M. alumns, all of whom have been his students in the clinic and related course. All of them are now judges in Korea.

Taking Prisoners’ Rights to Court

Tucker DeVoe

Tucker DeVoe, J.D. ’15

By Tucker DeVoe, J.D. ’15 

This March, I argued in front of the Honorable Raffi Nerses Yessayan of the Massachusetts Superior Court on behalf of my client.

He is an inmate in a Massachusetts state prison who had been denied parole. At his hearing, I argued that his denial of parole discriminated against him on account of his disabilities. The argument, along with my experience writing all the briefing for his case throughout the year, was a great opportunity to practice law outside of a classroom setting. At Harvard Prison Legal Assistance Project (PLAP), we believe that, through cases like his, we can advance the cause of prisoners’ rights and hold the state accountable to its own laws and policies.

PLAP  has helped prisoners with their legal issues for over forty years. My case is part of impact litigation, a small part of the overall program. The majority of PLAP cases come from disciplinary tickets. In Massachusetts, prisoner discipline requires formal written charges within an internal disciplinary system. Through PLAP, Harvard student attorneys represent prisoners at hearings and dispute the charges, ensuring that the prison system actually has the evidence necessary to institute discipline. In recent years, students have also taken on a number of parole hearings, representing prisoners asking for freedom in front of the entire parole board. My client was represented at his parole hearing by another PLAP student.

Getting into the mindset of an advocate was the most challenging part of my work on this case. Typical law school classes successfully prepare you to analyze cases and apply the law to the facts of your particular case. However, in class, you usually debate the relative pros and cons of both sides. As you move to advocacy, you have to switch gears and take on, own, and believe in the arguments for your client. In my case, I got into the advocacy mindset by repeatedly mooting and discussing the argument with my instructor, John Fitzpatrick, and the Hon. Judge John C. Cratsley, who teaches the Judicial Process in Trial Courts Clinic.

Through my experience in PLAP, I have developed skills in oral advocacy, client relationships, legal research and writing, and time management. I have also grown to better appreciate what it means  to help our nation’s prisoners, having visited six prisons (and counting!) throughout my time in the program.

HLS-CTS Independent Clinical opportunity, 2015-16

Are you interested in counterterrorism policy and prosecution and related national security matters? This is to inform you of an opportunity for HLS students to perform research and analytical work with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS), the Counterespionage Section, and the Office of Law and Policy (L&P), of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice as an independent clinical project, with Professor Rosenberg acting as faculty sponsor. The program has been offered for the past eleven years, and will continue for the 2015-2016 academic year.

As in the past, next year’s program will require students to perform clinical work during the Fall and Spring semesters. In addition, in the unlikely event an emergency project arises, students may be called upon to work during the Winter term (but only if such work does not conflict with the students’ normal Winter Term course obligations). Admission into the program is selective; to maximize the education value of challenging work and close supervision, enrollment will be limited to no more than four students. Selection will be based on a student’s academic performance, relevant experience, professional recommendations, and interest in the subject matter. All admitted students must also satisfy the background check requirements for the Department of Justice Volunteer Internship Program, sign a confidentiality agreement, and attend a mandatory orientation session in Cambridge at the beginning of the Fall semester.

Clinical credits are awarded through the independent clinical work program. Grading is Credit/Fail. Two clinical credits may be awarded (1 Fall credit + 1 Spring credit) and will be recorded on students’ transcripts at the end of the Spring semester. Due to the highly confidential nature of this program, students have the following independent clinical requirements waived: final paper and weekly emails. Standard clinical conditions preclude enrollees in the program from taking any other clinical course during the period of enrollment.

You may obtain further information about the HLS-CTS Independent Clinical offering by reading the 2013 Memorandum of Understanding . To apply, simply submit your most recent grade sheet (with Spring 2015 grades) and resume to Kim Peterson ( kpeterso at law.harvard.edu), Assistant to David Rosenberg, on or before June 26th.

This clinical program offers an extraordinary opportunity for both public service (including satisfying the pro bono requirement) and professional training.

Clinic Student Wins Social Security Disability Hearing

By Zoë Brennan-Krohn, J.D. ’15 

I joined the Disability Litigation and Benefits Advocacy Clinic in the fall of my 3L year in order to build on my pre-HLS experience with disability advocacy. I’ve long been interested in disability issues: I have an aunt with cerebral palsy and I worked for two years between high school and college doing direct services work with children with physical and intellectual disabilities. It felt natural to apply my legal training to this field that already felt very important to me.

Zoë Brennan-Krohn, J.D. '15

Zoë Brennan-Krohn, J.D. ’15

In my two semesters working in the clinic, I’ve had the privilege to engage in disability advocacy and social security representation in a number of contexts, including representing two clients in hearings before Administrative Law Judges, writing a district court brief, and creating and implementing general training on the social security disability application process.

My first client was a man who had struggled for years with severe, intractable depression and anxiety, as well as physical impairments. After many years of drug abuse, he had finally gotten sober more than a year ago, but was living in a homeless shelter and struggling profoundly with depression. He had applied for social security disability more than a year ago, and had been denied twice. He had an upcoming hearing before an Administrative Law Judge to challenge Social Security’s determination that he was ineligible for benefits.

Over my first two months working in the clinic, my client and I met several times, talking about his medical conditions, but also his life and struggles and goals. I gathered medical records and spoke to his doctors, and researched the standards for social security based on the client’s impairments.

One of the most rewarding parts of working on this case was having the opportunity to get to know my client in the weeks leading up to his administrative hearing. My primary role was that of legal advocate, and my job was to prepare him for his hearing, and research and articulate his legal claims. But disability issues are often intensely personal and emotional, and the way that his disability affected him was deeply intertwined with his biography and life experience. The process, then, of preparing for his hearing involved not only “pure” legal issues – doing legal research and writing, and mooting him in preparation for his testimony – but also developing a personal connection and sense of trust with him. Navigating and developing this combination of roles has been one of the most challenging and valuable parts of my clinical experience. This is a skill that cannot be developed in the classroom, and I felt very lucky to have supervision and mentorship from Julie McCormack and the patience of my client as I worked on understanding and fulfilling this role.

By his hearing late last fall, my client and I had spoken about the very personal issues of his depression and his life story on many occasions, and he was able to testify compellingly and openly about very personal and sensitive issues in his life. His poise and dignity in explaining these difficult matters was primarily a testament to his own strength and courage, but our preparation and extensive interaction leading up to the hearing played a part, too.

His hearing was successful. He was approved for disability benefits and received a retroactive check for the months that he was wrongfully denied benefits. Soon after our hearing, he also found an apartment, and moved out of the homeless shelter and into his own place for the first time in years.

Clinical work has been an invaluable complement to the classroom curriculum of my law school career: the complexities of direct legal representation are so much more nuanced and fluid than can be described in a classroom, and the rewards of working with clients and sharing in their success, are so very great.

An interview with a graduating clinic student

Daniel Ain Photo

Daniel Ain, J.D. ’15

During his last semester at Harvard Law, Daniel Ain ’15 participated in the Judicial Process in Community Courts Clinic. Our office reached out and asked him to share his thoughts about this experience. Please read his comments below.

OCP: What interested you in working with the Judicial Process in Community Courts Clinic?
DA: I enrolled in the clinic as a 3L because after two and a half years at law school I had yet to spend any significant time in a courtroom. My summer positions and other clinical work at Harvard Law School had been focused exclusively on transactional and corporate law. I reasoned that a placement at the court would give me a more balanced law-school experience.

OCP: What were your responsibilities?
DA: My placement was with the Hon. Mary K. Ames of the Massachusetts Superior Court, who presided over civil sessions during my time in the clinic. Two days each week I observed trials and motion hearing sessions, and assisted Judge Ames with legal research and drafting. In addition, I spent a significant amount of time each day speaking with Judge Ames in chambers about ongoing matters. My admiration for her only grew as I listened to her insights, always astute, conscientious and thoughtful.

OCP: How did your experience help you expand your knowledge horizon?
DA: I found the observational and research oriented components of the clinical placement beneficial. In observing trials, some multi-week in length, I learned a vast amount about procedure and, more importantly, about what makes a good trial attorney. From opening statements to examination of witnesses to closing statements, skilled advocates used their time effectively, always respectful of the court, and moved cases by narrowing in on the right topics and asking the right questions. The hearings reminded me of sitting in law school classes, with respect to the often creative (sometimes adventurous) and thoughtful legal arguments attorneys made to win (or attempt to win) a particular motion. As to my research and drafting assignments, these were challenging and useful exercises.

OCP: What memories will you take away from your clinical experience?
DA: More than the work, it is the people at the Superior Court I will remember most. The assistant clerk of the court, the court officer, and the law clerks I met, each loved working at the court and went out of their way to be helpful anytime I had a question or needed guidance. I consider Judge Ames a mentor and will always be thankful for the opportunity to work in her court. I know that I will carry the memories of my time working for Judge Ames with me throughout my legal career.

Student finds motivation in her clinical work

Ashley Lewis, J.D. '15

Ashley Lewis, J.D. ’15

By Ashley Lewis, J.D. ’15 

The most memorable moments of law school have been walking out of a courtroom with my client after a favorable decision. In that moment I am smiling, my client is smiling, and we both are ecstatic to have obtained a victory. After weeks or months of preparation the issue is resolved. My client can put the issue behind them and move on.

These are my most memorable moments, because it’s a privilege to be able to help someone successfully navigate the legal system. Fortunately I have had the opportunity to do such work since the first semester of my 1L year.

The moments I described above have all come from victories in criminal proceedings. Since fall of my 1L year I have been a member of Harvard Defenders, advocating for individuals accused of committing a criminal offense in show cause hearings. At this stage of the criminal process an offense is not on the client’s record and the clerk-magistrate is only determining whether probable cause exists. The hearing provides the unique opportunity to help clients avoid a criminal charge and collateral consequences completely.

This year, I had the opportunity to represent clients who have been officially charged with a crime through the Criminal Justice Institute (CJI). To have the opportunity to stand in court beside an individual, to make sure their voice is heard, that their rights are protected, and ensure that they aren’t lost in the criminal justice system is an experience beyond rewarding.

However, all of my cherished moments in law school haven’t come in a courtroom. Through the Veterans Law and Disability Benefits Clinic, I was able to help veterans obtain the benefits owed to them from Massachusetts and the federal government. In the Crimmigraiton Clinic, I answered letters of immigration detainees seeking legal assistance. In both clinics, I had the opportunity to help individuals that didn’t have a right to counsel navigate a complicated system.

These experiences, in conjunction with my experiences in CJI and Defenders, are the memories I will cherish the most after graduation. I came to law school to prepare for a career in public service. These experiences not only helped me prepare for a career, they were also a constant reminder of my goals and motivator for accomplishing them.

The International and Comparative Human Rights Practicum in India: A Hands-On Approach to Cross-Cultural Advocacy

fatma

Fatma Marouf received her J.D.
from Harvard Law School in 2002.

Via the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program 

Learning to work collaboratively across cultures, think creatively about relationships between law and organizing, and handle the myriad of challenges working with vulnerable, migrant populations are only some of the benefits that U.S. and Indian law students gain by participating in the International and Comparative Human Rights Practicum program. Born out of a relationship between U.S. and Indian law faculty through the Global Alliance for Justice Education (GAJE), Fatma Marouf (HLS ‘02) helped develop this unique Practicum, based in New Delhi, in order to bring together an interdisciplinary group of students to work in a hands-on environment on important human rights issues.

Marouf, a professor at William S. Boyd School of Law at University of Nevada, Las Vegas and Co-Director of the school’s Immigration Clinic, worked closely with Indian colleagues Anannya Bhattacharjee at the Society for Labour and Development (SLD), Dr. Moushumi Basu, a professor at Jawaharal Nehru University’s School of International Studies, and Khadijah Faruqui, a distinguished women’s rights lawyer, to build a program where students could take their classroom experience into a real world setting. Three other HLS ’02 graduates and alumni of the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic — Jennifer Rosenbaum, Sabi Ardalan, and Dustin Sharp– have co-taught the Practicum, contributing to its great success.

Continue reading the story here.

From Bosnia to Somalia: Classifying “Involvement” in Armed Conflict

Via the International Human Rights Clinic 

The laws governing armed conflict may seem simple on the surface. Soldiers can be targeted; civilians cannot. But the line between these groups is blurry and can have life-and-death implications.

Under international humanitarian law, or the laws of war, civilians can be intentionally killed if they “directly participate in hostilities.” But what does direct participation mean? What if a civilian feeds combatants, drives members of an armed group, provides equipment or intelligence, or takes up arms to protect family members? Does it matter if involvement was voluntary or forced? Do such actions mean the civilian can be lawfully targeted?

CIVICCoverA new 84-page report, to which the International Human Rights Clinic contributed a case study, takes a fresh look at this contentious issue. The People’s Perspectives: Civilian Involvement in Armed Conflict, released Tuesday by the Center for Civilians in Conflict (CIVIC), documents the experiences of people in four former or current conflict zones: Bosnia, Libya, Gaza, and Somalia. It does not seek to come up with a conclusive definition of direct participation in hostilities. Instead, it aims to inform the debate among military commanders, lawyers, academics, and other experts by adding the voices of those who have lived through war.

The report finds that civilians become involved in conflict in a number of ways, ranging from fighting to providing logistical support to membership in civil defense forces or political parties. While sometimes voluntary, their involvement is often motivated by threats from armed groups or the need to survive. The people CIVIC interviewed had varied understandings of who is a civilian and who is a combatant and found it difficult to delineate the difference. They agreed, however, that the legal status that derives from involvement can not only determine whether civilians are targeted but also affect their lives long after a conflict ends.

Continue reading the full story here.

Congratulations to Zoe, 2015 Law Student Ethics Award Winner!

Harvard Law School student Zoe Brennan-Krohn ’15 recently won the 2015 Law Student Ethics Award from the Association of Corporate Counsel, Northeast Chapter. One of ten students honored from participating local law schools, Zoe was recognized for demonstrating a commitment to ethics through her work in the Clinical and Pro Bono Program.

She has completed hundreds of pro bono work hours during her time at Harvard Law School. She has participated in the Disability Litigation and Benefits Advocacy Clinic, the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic, the Independent Clinical Program, and the Tenant Advocacy Project.

“I am delighted that Zoe’s exceptional legal abilities are being recognized with this award,” said Senior Clinical Instructor Julie McCormack, who has supervised Zoe in the Disability Litigation and Benefits Advocacy Clinic.

According to the Chapter, the award was created “to recognize and encourage the ethical practice of law at the earliest stages of a young lawyer’s professional career, and at the same time to shine a spotlight on ethics more generally, demonstrating that the legal community values lawyers who are guided by ethical principles. The award, which includes a $1,000 scholarship, is given to twelve students, one from each of the participating local law schools, who have demonstrated an early commitment to ethics through work in clinical programs representing their first real clients.”

Zoe

L-R: Paul Nightingale, President of Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC), Northeast Chapter; Zoe Brennan-Krohn J.D. ’15; Jim Peck, Co-Chair of ACC-Northeast Ethics Committee

“I am very honored to have received this award. Clinical and Student Practice Organization work has been a critical part of my experience here at HLS, in part because of the opportunities it creates to grapple with real-life ethical challenges under the guidance of experienced attorneys,” Zoe said. “I feel very lucky to have worked with such thoughtful clinical faculty who worked with me to develop tools to address the ethical challenges that arise in the context of serving low-income clients.”

The Northeast Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel held the eleventh annual Law Student Ethics Awards dinner on April 16, 2015 at the State Room in Boston. CNN Senior Political Analyst David Gregen gave the keynote address.

New Publication Examines Different Approaches to Assisting Victims of Armed Conflict and Armed Violence”

Via the International Human Rights Clinic

(Cambridge, MA, April 30, 2015) – Mitigating the human costs of armed conflict and armed violence has become a moral and legal imperative over the past two decades. Within the international community, several strategies for helping civilian victims have emerged. A publication, released this week by Harvard Law School’s Human Rights Program and Action on Armed Violence (AOAV), seeks to advance understanding and promote collaboration among leaders in the field.

AcknowledgeAmendAssist-compressedcover-212x300The 28-page report, Acknowledge, Amend, Assist: Addressing Civilian Harm Caused by Armed Conflict and Armed Violence, examines a range of current approaches: casualty recording, civilian harm tracking, making amends, transitional justice, and victim assistance. In so doing, the report illuminates their commonalities and differences and analyzes the difficulties they face individually and collectively.

“These programs all provide valuable assistance to civilian victims, but they have yet to be viewed holistically,” said Bonnie Docherty, editor of the volume and lecturer on law in the Human Rights Program. “A comparative look at the approaches could help reduce overlapping efforts and identify gaps that should be closed.”

Continue reading the full story here.

Mandatory pro bono requirement for students increases to 50 hours

Via HLS News

The Harvard Law School faculty has voted to increase the school’s mandatory pro bono service requirement for students from 40 hours to 50 hours of service during the students’ three years of law school. The change goes into effect beginning with the class entering in the fall of 2015.

While the vast majority of HLS students complete many more hours of pro bono service than the mandatory minimum (averaging more than 500 hours per student), the new minimum aligns HLS with recent recommendations by the American Bar Association asking law schools to encourage students to complete 50 hours of service. It also reflects the ABA recommendation that practicing lawyers devote 50 hours of pro bono legal services per year.

“The legal profession at its core offers service in pursuit of justice, and our School has long and proudly cultivated public service opportunities for our students who in turn embrace the mission,” said Dean Martha Minow. “Most students far exceed the 40 hours of pro bono service  we have required — the average number of hours per student in recent years has been close to 600! As the challenges for those who cannot afford to pay for legal help grow, and eager new students seek to tackle issues of housing, veterans’ needs, criminal justice, environmental protection, immigration, and more, we join the American Bar Association’s recommendation in setting 50 hours as the level of pro bono work for students expecting to enter the bar.  Our own students show us how the rising generation of young lawyers will lead the way to close the terrible distance between those who need legal help and those who can obtain it.”

Harvard Law School students satisfy the pro bono requirement in a variety of ways, including through the school’s public interest clinics and student practice organizations, public interest summer positions, and term-time pro bono opportunities.

Since 2011, 99 percent of each graduating class has performed more than 40 pro bono hours during the law school years. The average number of hours per student has consistently been more than 500 hours, and the median has been more than 400 hours.

Spring double-header for the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program

JiayunHo_Seanan-Fong-768x1024

Jiayun Ho LL.M. ’15 and Seanan Fong HDS ’16, spent two months conducting “The Sudbury Listening Project.” A tense political climate in the Town of Sudbury, Mass., led the Sudbury Clergy Association to contract with the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program to assist with increasingly hostile exchanges between and among stakeholders in a variety of settings.

Via HLS News

The Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program (HNMCP) at Harvard Law School is making news for work it has done to promote civil discourse in town government and to help police mediate civilian complaints.

A tense political climate in the Town of Sudbury, Mass., led the Sudbury Clergy Association to contract with the Harvard Negotiation & Mediation Clinical Program to assist with increasingly hostile exchanges between and among stakeholders in a variety of settings and to make recommendations for a kinder, gentler protocol for doing business at town meetings, in town government, and in the schools.

Jiayun Ho LL.M. ’15 and Seanan Fong HDS ’16, spent two months conducting The Sudbury Listening Project —which included interviews, focus groups, and a town survey — to evaluate sources of tension and make recommendations on ways the town might move forwards in reconciliation and collaboration.

Read more about this project here and here, and see excerpt below.

Through the Harvard Mediation Program, HNMCP is also working with the Boston Police Department to set up a better system for resolving many of the civilian complaints lodged against officers.

Continue reading the full story here.

First Line of Defense

Via Harvard Bulletin 

Students represent the indigent in courts where judges ask,
‘Is Harvard in the building?’

Credit: Mark Ostow Training ethical, zealous advocates CJI Deputy Director Dehlia Umunna (right) with Amanda Savage ’15, Asmara Carbado ’15 and Cass Luskin ’15 at the Roxbury District Court. The students represented clients through the CJI Criminal defense clinic, handling all aspects of their cases.

Credit: Mark Ostow
Training ethical, zealous advocates CJI Deputy Director Dehlia Umunna (right) with Amanda Savage ’15, Asmara Carbado ’15 and Cass Luskin ’15 at the Roxbury District Court. The students represented clients through the CJI Criminal defense clinic, handling all aspects of their cases.

On a frigid, snow-packed morning in mid-February, the galleries in the Roxbury division of Boston Municipal Court were jammed with people waiting for their cases to be heard, and half a dozen Harvard Law School students, part of the Criminal Justice Institute’s Criminal Defense Clinic, were waiting to defend their clients.

Cass Luskin ’15 was representing a man accused of assault and battery. “It’s been a month, and I have just as little in my file as I did at the arraignment,” he told the judge. He asked the court’s indulgence to speak with his supervisor, Dehlia Umunna, CJI deputy director. After a bit of whispered advice, he continued, asking for an out-of-court compliance date for his discovery request so that the prosecution would be required to give him a copy of the evidence they had against his client before the next court date. The judge agreed to his request. Outside another courtroom, Yorda Yenenh ’15 and one of her clients huddled with Umunna after the judge unexpectedly denied a motion to dismiss his case and instead set a trial date. “You know we believe in you,” Umunna told the client. “We are not giving up.” Yenenh and the client then headed into a room to confer about the next steps.

The students take on anywhere from three to seven cases at a time, a mix of misdemeanors and small felonies, representing both adults and juveniles who cannot pay for their own defense lawyers—mostly in Roxbury and Dorchester courts. As the clinic has expanded in response to increased demand by students (this year, enrollment was up by 58 percent), so has the court system’s familiarity with it; judges have been known to specifically request the HLS clinic.

Continue reading the full story here.

Cyberlaw Clinic Presents at WeRobot 2015

IMG_0277-300x300Via the Cyberlaw Clinic

Spring 2015 Cyberlaw Clinic students Jack Xu and Cecillia Xie joined the Clinic’s Managing Director Chris Bavitz on a trip to Seattle last month to participate in the WeRobot 2015 robotics law and policy conference at University of Washington School of Law in Seattle. Accompanied by Chelsea Barabas of the MIT Center for Civic Media, the Clinic’s representatives attended the conference to present their working draft paper entitled, “Legal and Ethical Issues in the Use of Telepresence Robots:  Best Practices and Toolkit.” J. Nathan Matias, also of the Center for Civic Media, contributed to the paper but was unable to attend the event.

Chris, Jack, Cecillia, and Chelsea joined discussant Laurel Riek of Notre Dame for a panel discussion about the paper and, more broadly, about privacy and related concerns that arise in connection with the use of telepresence robots. The draft paper and panel discussion helped to lay the groundwork for development a broader law and policy toolkit examining legal concerns that arise in connection with the use of telepresence robots. Professor Riek’s approach — grounding the project in the literature of AI and robotics research — helped to guide the discussion, which focused on the Clinic’s methodology and the scope and scale of its work.

Continue reading the story here.

Keeping the Fire Alive: Lawyering in the Public Interest

Akhila Kolisetty, J.D. '15

Akhila Kolisetty, J.D. ’15

Via Ms. JD 

As someone deeply passionate about social justice and public interest lawyering, I have found Bill Quigley’s “Letter to a Law Student,” particularly telling and poignant.  Quigley notes that “justice is a counter-cultural value in our legal profession,” and that a social justice student “cannot be afraid to be different than others in law school or the profession.”

Quigley’s words have rang true for me: becoming a social justice lawyer can at times be challenging and isolating, and yet fulfilling beyond words.  As a law student, my most memorable moments have been at the intersection of social justice and the law: being able to stand up in court and argue on behalf of a survivor of domestic violence in her family law case, working with a refugee on his immigration case, or conducting human rights research and advocacy from Sierra Leone to India.  My experiences in law school have only taught me to think more critically about social justice lawyering.  This work can be a challenge: it forces you to think on your feet, can be emotionally draining, exposes you to ethical questions and quandaries, and requires you to grapple with complexity.  You realize that nothing is quite simple; no problem is so easily solved. You lose some idealism, but you gain in critical insight and wisdom.

Continue reading the story here.

Older posts Newer posts