Two days ago Jake McKee gave an amazing talk at There’s a New Conversation in New York. He came all the way from Dallas to share some of the great work he and his cohorts had done at the Lego Company, inspired in part by The Cluetrain Manifesto.
I didn’t get the whole backstory on the trip until I read this in his blog today.
The short of it is that American Airlines not only decided not to waive the opportunity to soak Jake an extra $359 for moving his departure from New York one day ahead to make his grandma’s funeral, but gave him this peevish, passive-aggressive policy-über-alles response: “American reviewed the policy a few years back and decided that since funeral homes, doctors, and clothiers don’t discount their rates, we shouldn’t either.”
Wow. What a shitty thing to say to a bereaved customer. Not to mention dumb and irrelevant.
Jake concludes,
| When I told Irving, the supervisor, that I’d been a loyal customer for years and that I felt that the “fare difference” (i.e. we charge more for certain times of the day for the exact same overhead) should be waived if for nothing else than because it was the best way American could return the loyalty I’d shown them over the years he said: |
| “I’m not here to argue with you, sir.” |
| And I’m not here to argue with you either, American. In fact, I’m not here to fly with you, defend you, or support you. Not only have I lost interested in maintaining our quasi-relationship, I’ll now actively work to find alternatives to using you. (Hard to do when you live in Dallas, but absolutely not impossible). I’ll encourage others to think twice about using you. All because you were more interested in potentially getting an extra $359. |
| Bravo. |
| You stuck to your principles, now it’s my turn. |
And a sincere Bravo to Jake as well.
-
In VRM project, I understand that companies should focus on their job (that is to manufacture a product or to deliver a service), and that the energy to put offer and demand in contact should be shared between vendor and buyer. Then the price of the product/service shall be as close as possible to the production cost + margin.
Considering this, everything that costs someting has to be charged. Does this make sens? -
Doc, Thanks for the mention. Actually, “academics” (urban and architectural history and field work, history of national identities, and quite a bit of architectural and ethnographic photography) was the less than the half of it. The bulk of it indeed was “marketing communications” and “strategic sales support” much of it ala Boorman, and later strategic and change consultancy and opening companies to the perceptions and wishes of the individuals and groups comprising the outside world (not unlike VRM) (through communications). This propoelled me though a hundred or so clients in a score of industries. Now, I am glad that we are back in touch and collaborating on projects that contribute to ensuring that the internet (except in its humor and irony) never turns into Boorman’s Journal. Steve
-
[…] Doc Searls Weblog · UnAmerican Airline This is so typical of American — I’d rather walk than fly with them. Did I mention the time we spent 12 hours at Newark with two kids? Or the time my connecting AA flight didn’t wait for my first AA flight and I had to spend the night, on my own dime? (tags: aa airlines service) […]
-
Doc, it was great to see you again! Thanks for the compliment about the presentation, even if it’s quite unnerving to have the guy who literally wrote the book sitting in the audience 🙂
And thanks or promoting the American Airlines story. I know common logic is to just ignore these issues and chalk it up as nothing more than “how things work”. A blogger told me recently that he was dropping his discussion of the airlines to focus on things that will actually get some traction.
How sad is that? Airlines suck so bad, it’s just simply not worth the time because nothing’s going to change. Blech.
Comments are now closed.

10 comments