We have two iPhones in our family. Yesterday we traded in the older one — my wife’s first-generation model, bought in 2007 — at Radio Shack. They gave us $72.94 for the phone and charger, against $199 for a new 16Gb iPhone 4. We’ll probably trade our other iPhone, my second-generation 3g one, pretty soon too.
Apple doesn’t have the same offer. I’m not sure who else does. I wouldn’t have known about it if I hadn’t stopped in a Radio Shack to buy an ethernet cable a few days ago, when the kid behind the counter told me about it. Turns out Radio Shack will take a lot of stuff in trade. Since my iPhone 3g is brand new (I replaced it at an Apple store last month for $79, before I knew about this deal), I can get $116.13 for it, according to the online appraisal system at that last link.
Yes, it bothers me that we’re staying inside Apple and AT&T’s joint silo. It also bothers me that Fake Steve Jobs is right about Android fragmentation. I also see a serious risk that Real Steve Jobs might succeed at repositioning closed systems as “integrated”. Just because, well, he’s Steve. We’re all in his reality distortion field now.
Speaking of which, Apple is now bigger than Microsoft, and the iPhone is now bigger than Rim.
I still see this as a phase, and not a bad one. Apple and Google have together cracked open the unholy death grip that phone makers and carriers have long had on the mobile world. At some point those two halves will come completely apart.
Until they do, we won’t have ambient connectivity, or what I call the Frankston Threshold.
But we’ll get there. It’s inevitable.
[Later…] If you do trade in an old iPhone, be sure to erase it before handing it over. Do that under Settings/General/Reset/Erase all content and settings.
Tags: "Bob Frankston", Apple, Fake Steve Jobs, microsoft, RIM, Steve Jobs
-
You got ripped off.
Old iPhones are worth a lot more than $72.95
-
Hi Doc – interesting post. One line that stuck out a little for me:
“Apple and Google have together cracked open the unholy death grip that phone makers and carriers have long had on the mobile world.”
It seems to me that, by accident or design, Google have done precisely the opposite: Handing incumbent phone makers and carriers a tool that lets them stay in the game. Android has basically saved LG, Samsung, HTC et al from either years of development of their own OS or millions in fees to Microsoft to license Windows Phone. It’s also handed the carriers the ability to “tailor their customer experience” (read: “install a load of useless crapware and lock their the phones tightly”).
Not saying that this is bad, in the sense that Android’s existence increases consumer choice (which is always good). But I don’t think Google deserves any credit for breaking that “unholy death grip” – that wasn’t their intention, and it’s not really in their business interests.
-
Take a look at eBay.
The iPhone 3G still has an asking price in the hundreds there.
Comments are now closed.
6 comments