I spent some time at Prawsfblawg this afternoon, where the discussion
is “should we scrap the third year of law school?” — in response to the current
Legal Affairs Debate Club topic, featuring Laura Appleman and Daniel Solove.
I’m bemused by Laura’s assertion that law schools have a financial interest in
keeping the three-year system, while law professors are interested in the
teaching and mentoring benefits of the longer matriculation period. I weighed
in on the (in)appropriateness of reducing the number of law students in response
to a supposed oversupply. (My contention: there’s plenty of unmet demand for
lawyers, but the profession prices itself out of the reach of most Americans.)
It’s disappointing that there seems to be no law professors who are haiku poets.
Lucky for us, though, professors in many other fields have turned their talents
to haiku. A prime example, psychologist George Swede:
Two willows —
each its own way
with the windBurial
mourners and bare trees
blend
storm lull
freshly crumpled paper
creaks twice
In one year
work life ends—drizzle
with the rainbow
George Swede from The Heron’s Nest
“storm lull” (June 2003); “burial” (June 2005)
“two willows” (March 2005); “in one year” (Sept. 2005)
- by dagosan
scraping and scraping
his shoe —
curses for a nameless cur
the rose garden past its peak —
bending to sniff,
his bald spot shows
[Sept. 19, 2005]
potluck
The NCAA News ran an article last Monday, explaining
how this year’s NIT would work, and noting that the purchase
of NIT by NCAA “ironically” meant that the core antitrust issue
would not be addressed — whether the NCAA could forbid teams
invited to the NCAA Tournament from going to any other tournament.
See our post antitrusters question NCAA purchase of NIT
At Blawg Review #24, Jay Williams tells you where to go
and seems to suggest our 2005 Harvest Moon post as an alternative
to falling asleep in class. (Hint to Jaybeas: the plural form of “haiku”
is “haiku”.)
Martin Grace of RiskProf has collected links related to the Good
Samaritan Paradox and public policy. Dare I ask: “What would Jesus do?”
Something tells me Jesus would not be an Austrian Economist.
Haiku is plural? Curses!
Oh well, the problem’s been fixed now.
Comment by Jay Williams — September 19, 2005 @ 9:06 pm
Haiku is plural? Curses!
Oh well, the problem’s been fixed now.
Comment by Jay Williams — September 19, 2005 @ 9:06 pm