f/k/a archives . . . real opinions & real haiku

Over the past few days, I’ve been thinking about the remarkable change

 

in the role of women in the realm of diplomacy and international relations,

 

since I entered college in 1967, at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. 

 

Walsh School of Foreign Service. 

The Mighty and the Almighty

 

My musing was touched off by Madeleine Albright’s appearance on the 

 

Charlie Rose Show on May 3, 2006 (guest host Andrea Mitchell; $.99

 

video download from Google.com). Albright was touting her just-released

 

book, The Mighty and the Almighty: Reflections on America, God and World

 

Affairs. More musing was sparked yesterday, when I heard that British P.M.

 

Tony Blair had named Margaret Beckett Britain’s first woman Foreign Secretary

 

(BBC profile, May 5, 2006).

 

 

Albright, the first female U.S. Secretary of State, mentioned that gender did not

 

seem at all relevant when Condoleeza Rice was named as President Bush’s top 

 

security advisor, nor when she was elevated to Secretary of State in 2005.  She

 

then noted that the State Department now had so many women in important staff

 

and policy positions, who have been educated at Georgetown, that they are called

 

the “Georgetown Mafia” within the Department. [Albright used the phrase to close

 

a commencement speech at Georgetown in 1999: “the best of luck and come to

 

the Foreign Service and join the Georgetown Mafia.”]   

 

 

Read on for the tale of how a Georgetown Mafia came about.  Let’s look at

 

Albright’s path and my own:

 

 

 

 

In 1963, Madeleine Albright gave birth to twins girls (Anne and Alice) and, in 1967,

 

her third daughter (Katharine) was born.  For the next eight years, she was very

 

busy working on a doctorate from Columbia University (awarded in 1976), while

 

raising her children, serving on the board (and then as the first woman Chairman)

 

of the Beauvior School and working on the Muskie and Mondale presidential cam-

 

paigns.  From 1976 to 1978, she served as Chief Legislative Assistant to Senator

 

Edmund S. Muskie, and then left to take a staff position at the National Security

 

Council.

 

 

In 1982, Albright came to Georgetown to teach.  In Madam Secretary : A Memoir

 

(2003), she explains [at 99 – 100]:

 

“My charge at Georgetown was threefold: teach, create the Donner

women’s program [established “to encourage women to enter interna-

tional relations”], and serve as a role model for the young women there.

I believed that if women were to compete with men in the international

arena, they needed to receive an education that prepared them for every

challenge, including those no woman had faced before.”

 

In contrast, here’s my tale for the same time period:

 

1963 – 1967  newspaper carrier, high school student

1967 to 1971  student at GU School of Foreign Service

1973 – 1976  law student

thereafter — practiced law for 20 years, with no international

                relations subject matter;

currently — occasionally offer amateur punditry on international

                affairs issues; still wish there were more women around

 

Back to the issue of gender and international affairs:  When I headed off to

 

Washington, D.C., in early September, 1967, I had all the usual hopes and

 

worries of a college freshman.  One thing seemed strange about the SFS:

 

only 20 of the 220 freshman were female.  For a guy who was shy in the

 

dating depatment that was not a good sign.

 

          DAG71g

             dagosan 1971

 

Things moved rapidly at that time.  With the Vietnam War becoming a very

 

hotly disputed issue, many classmates found ourselves disillusioned with the

 

whole notion of — in the words of the SFS catalogue — “promoting and protecting

 

the nation’s international interests” through foreign service.  (see Washington Post,

 

“GU Foreign Service School Seeks Identity,” March 24, 1970, which noted a 21

 

percent drop in applications to SFS in the past year, and quoted an idealist 21-year–

 

old chap named David Giacalone, who decried the School “making us agents of Amer-

 

ican foreign and economic policy” and hoped SFS graduates could go out into the

 

international realm as “world citizens.”)

 

 

Several agitators (on a rather conservative and apathetic campus) started to 

 

seek more student input in course requirements and content.  My own inter-

 

est in broadening the notion of “international service” led me to run for the very

 

first elected student seat on the SFS Executive Committee, which was the School’s

 

policy-making board. [The first student on the Committee had been appointed the 

 

prior year.]  It was 1970. When I won (and I truly can’t remember if any one else

 

even wanted the position), I found myself in the lofty company of all the department

 

heads, the Dean, and a few other venerable faculty members.  It was a bit stressful,

 

especially since none of the other Executive Committee members looked like this. 

 

Luckily, my academic reputation was excellent, and my demeanor respectful, and

 

there were some friendly faces on the Committee, including the Dean. 

 

 

 

 

By that time, I had learned that the paucity of female SFS students was not due

 

to a lack of applicants, but was caused by a quota — only 10% of the student body

 

was allowed to be female.  (This was before federal laws banned such gender dis-

 

crimination.)   My first proposal to the Executive Committee, therefore, was that

 

acceptance to the School be gender-neutral.   The reaction from the “conservative”

 

and “traditionalist” members of the Committee (even a woman or two) was strong

 

and emphatic:

 

“There are no jobs for women in the diplomatic field.  (E.g.,

Many countries would not accept women in American diplo-

matic positions.)  Therefore, it would be extremely unfair to

young women to hold out the false hope of careers in inter-

national relations by accepting them in large numbers to

the School of Foreign Service.”

 

I literally cannot remember how the voting broke down (I never kept a diary and

 

there were no personal computers, much less weblogs).  Nor can I say what argu-

 

ments saved the day — although I’m betting the sharp dropoff in applications had 

 

swayed a few minds.  Nonetheless, my proposal was eventually adopted.  The

 

oldest and largest school of international relations in the nation would henceforth

 

have a gender-neutral admissions policy. 

 

                     “malesym”

 

The change was not quick enough to help my social life.  A decade later,

 

when Madeleine Albright came to the School of Foreign Service, and created

 

the Donner Foundation to encourage women to enter the field, there was a

 

student body at the SFS that had a significant female presence, and a sizeable

 

cadre of well-educated women were ready to enter into the foreign service, and to

 

take public, private, and nonprofit positions in the field of international relations.

 

 

Yes, the change in admissions policy and in gender equality at the State Depart-

 

were certainly inevitable.  Nonetheless, I’m proud to have played a part in helping

 

to lay the foundation for the Georgetown Mafia.  

 

 

If you educate them [and they take advantage of opportunities, work extremely hard, and 

 

have mentors]  they will thrive.  An important notion for many aspects of

 

our often unjust and unfair world.

 

 

 

 

afterthought (10 AM):  You’ll have to decide for yourselves whether the following

 

excerpts from Albright’s Madam Secretary : A Memoir [at 100 – 101] are — or should

 

be — analogously applicable to the legal profession in the 21st Century:

 

“I taught classes on international affairs to women and men, drawing

on what I had learned in the Carter White House. . . . I had female

students play roles they wouldn’t have had at that time in government

and had male students report to them.  I invited women professionals to

discuss their varied and jagged career patterns to illustrate that the shor-

test distance between two points might not be a straight line.” . . .

“I discussed the difficult choices women face and implored my students

not to let others see the chips that might have settled on their shoulders —

especially during job interviews.  I spoke with passion about how women

must make sure not to push the ladder of success away from the building

after they have climbed to the top but must help each other succeed.”

[Ed. Note:  Is Albright being too hard on herself when she adds:]  

“I was confident about the logic of all this, but my shift in marital status

[with her divorce finalized] had in my own mind made me lose credibility.

When my students asked how I had managed to be married and have

children and work at the same time, I felt like a phony because I hadn’t

succeeded.”

 

p.s.  If anyone reading this post has further details (or any corrections) on the topic

 

of SFS’s admission quotas or goals concerning women, please let me know.

 

 

 

 

fund drive

the ivy covered building

has a new name

new dean

all blackboards

turn white

windowless classroom

the blank look

same as last term

around and around

learning the names

of one way streets

winfow box —

between flowering pansies

my daughter’s face

Yu Chang – Upstate Dim Sum