You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Search

Connecticut Supreme Court refuses to enforce unconscionable post-nuptial agreement

August 5th, 2011 by Joseph William Singer

The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in Bedrick v. Bedrick, 17 A.3d 17 (Conn. 2011) that post-nuptial agreements may be enforceable but that they are subject to stricter standards than premartial agreements. Moreover, in this case, the court found the contract unconscionable at the time of trial and thus void and unenforceable. Such agreements must be examined to ensure that they are fair and equitable at the time of divorce and whether enforcement would “work an injustice.”

Posted in Marital property | Comments Off on Connecticut Supreme Court refuses to enforce unconscionable post-nuptial agreement

Comments are closed.