Easements implied by prior use or by necessity
June 8th, 2012 by Joseph William SingerThe Massachusetts Land Court has reaffirmed that easements can be implied from prior use if they were used before severance of the two parcels and are “reasonably necessary” for use of the dominant estate while easements by necessity require the dominant estate to be inaccessible but for the easement. Black v. Klaetke, 20 LCR 120, 2012 Mass. LCR LEXIS 56 (Mass. Land Ct. 2012).
Posted in Easements, Real estate transactions | Comments Off on Easements implied by prior use or by necessity