You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.

Search

Conditional permits subject to relaxed standard of review rather than the rigorous proofs required for variances

October 2nd, 2013 by Joseph William Singer

New Jersey confusingly refers to conditional permits as “conditional use variances.” This language makes it easy to confuse conditional permits and variances. In TSI East Brunswick, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Tp. of East Brunswick, 71 A.3d 762 (N.J. 2013), the Supreme Court of New Jersey reaffirmed the traditional rule that variances should be granted only in cases of unusual hardship (or other statutory requirements) because they allow something to be done that violates the intent of the zoning ordinance. Conditional permits, on the other hand, allow an activity to occur on land as long as the conditions are met and thus are subject to a lower standard of proof; they are presumptively permitted (as long as the conditions are established) rather than presumptively prohibited.

Posted in Zoning | Comments Off on Conditional permits subject to relaxed standard of review rather than the rigorous proofs required for variances

Comments are closed.