You are viewing a read-only archive of the Blogs.Harvard network. Learn more.
6 March 2004

More student concerns

A friend asked this recently, and I thought I’d put it out the blogosphere as to what you all would do.

A female minority student told me that she was intimidated in my
class because of (a) all the white males in it, (b) all the white
students in general in the class, and (c) the lack of respect the
former groups, particularly the white males, are expressing in their
comments and behavior toward others in the class and that she wanted me
to do something about it. What exactly I am not sure — maybe express
that we need to elevate the level of respect toward each other and try
to keep the side jokes to a minimum. I’m not really sure what to do
with this one because I want to take her seriously and respond in a way
that communicates I heard her concern, but I’m not sure what to do.

Any ideas?

Posted in IvoryTower on 6 March 2004 at 12:53 pm by Nate

Voting in the US

I was at a party last night where a couple of the good people there
were advocating that the US needs mandatory voting, like Australia, to
boost the number of voters.  (What’s funny is that no one seemed
to question why it was better
to have more voters.  Any good answers out there [by which I mean,
do you have any supportable reasons based on logic, rather than the
typical “It’s just better when more people vote”]?)(

So I asked a friend who’s much better with American politics than I am
why we perceive that the voters in the US are so low.  Here’s his
response:

When people talk about “low turnout” what they really are talking about is
declining turnout. I argue that most of the causes of low turnout have to do
with the denominator. When we hear reports about voter turnout, we hear about
turnout in the voting age population — many of which are excluded from voting
for a variety of reasons, including felony convictions and non-citizenship. If
we look instead at the voting eligible population (those that could vote if they
wanted to), turnout is much higher and has actually remained pretty stable since
the 1950s. There have still been declines since the turn of the century, but
that has to do more with expansions in the voting eligible population (i.e.,
extending the franchise to women and 18 – 21 year olds) than anything
else.

If you look comparatively, however, the US does indeed have lower turnout
than most other democracies. No one is really sure about why this is the case.
One argument is that unlike voters in most democracies because of federalism
voters in the US have the opportunity to vote on a very large number of
electoral questions. We vote for local government officials and issues. We vote
for state government officials and issues. We vote for national government
officials. Voters in many other democracies only vote for the national
government, which then appoints the local and regional government officials.
Other possible explanations include: (a) weak partisanship as opposed to weak
parties  — we just don’t get excited about political issues let alone political
parties (although that appears to be changing in this election); (b) no
requirement to vote — voting in the US is a choice, but in many other
democracies there are penalties for not voting in an election; and (c)
restrictions (e.g., residency requirements and registration requirements) that
limit the pool of who is eligible to vote in a given election in the US.
Posted in Politicks on 6 March 2004 at 12:45 pm by Nate