License
May 22nd, 2009
All posts in The Occasional Pamphlet by Stuart M. Shieber are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
on scholarly communication
All posts in The Occasional Pamphlet by Stuart M. Shieber are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
If you'd like me to continue to follow you on Mastodon, make sure to put your Mastodon username in your own profile, so that tools like debirdify, twitodon, and fedifinder can do their work. 4/4
About 6 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
What happens in the longer term is up in the air. Further action by Twitter to stop Mastodon linking and other aggressions will speed up my transition. 3/4
About 6 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
My plan going forward, for the time being at least, is to continue to post identically at Twitter and Mastodon, but I will restrict my replies and other "engagement" to Mastodon. 2/4
About 6 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Having a serious allergy to drama, I'm trying out Mastodon as a Twitter alternative. For any followers who would like to follow me at the new location, I've put my Mastodon username in my Twitter display name. 1/4
About 6 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Since we first distributed our #goodOA guide 10 years ago today, over 70 institutions have enacted simpatico #openaccess policies. We'd love to know (harvard.goodoa@gmail.com) if it's helped you too! bit.ly/goodoa h/t @petersuber
About 8 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Moderating principles blogs.harvard.edu/pamphlet/20…
About 11 months ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
@srush_nlp @redpony @yoavgo …but they'd probably argue that matching up of words and corresponding letters is not a *syntactic* requirement, much as in their argument against "respectively" constructions in section 4 of <jstor.org/stable/25001071>. Rather, it's a semantic or even pragmatic phenomenon. 2/2
About a year ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
@srush_nlp @redpony @yoavgo I'm assuming @yoavgo is thinking of an argument that the full phrase and its acronym display a cross-serial dependency, as in the CSDDSG example? I'd defer to Pullum and Gazdar (GaP) on this, ... 1/2
About a year ago from Stuart Shieber (@pmphlt@mas.to)'s Twitter · reply · retweet · favorite
Leave a Reply